This is an exploratory study designed to investigate the effects of aerobic dual belt treadmill walking versus traditional treadmill exercise on gait performance and functional capacity in older adults at risk for mobility disability. Identifying the relationship between aerobic treadmill exercise (dual belt or traditional) and the recovery of walking abilities will serve to optimize current rehabilitation approaches.
Participants will be forty-eight older adults with pre-clinical mobility disability who will be randomized into one of three intervention groups: dual-belt treadmill exercise, traditional treadmill exercise, or non-contact control. Prior to and following 16 weeks of therapy, we will observe the participants' performing several functional movements (walking, standing from sitting, sitting from standing, walking up and down stairs) and measure their muscular activity. These performance-based measures will be obtained to determine whether their movement function improves as a result of therapeutic intervention. The participants' absolute performance on any of these tasks does not matter as much as that they make the very best effort on each of the tests. They are welcome to take a break at any point in the testing or training.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
58
The dual-belted exercise treadmill can control the speeds of the right and left legs individually. When asymmetric, the dual-belt treadmill imposes mechanical and sensory perturbations independently to each leg such that the central nervous system (CNS) must solve and adapt to the challenge to maintain walking.
The treadmill exercise will maintain the speed of the right and left leg together while walking.
This group will not be assigned to a treadmill but is as a non-exercising control group.
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Change in Gait Speed
Gait speed will be determined from kinematic and kinetic measurement methods. A low value would indicate a slower walking speed compared to a higher value (faster walking speed).
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in temporal variability
Temporal will be determined from kinematic and kinetic measurement methods. Lower values correspond to better walking performance.
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in spatial variability
Spatial will be determined from kinematic and kinetic measurement methods. Lower values correspond to better walking performance.
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in physical performance
Using the Short Physical Performance Battery. A score is generated from 0 (worst performance)-12 (best performance).
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in cognitive impairment
Using the Mini Mental State Exam. Each item has 5 possible points. Scores greater than or equal to 27 (out of 30) indicates normal cognition. Severe = \<9, moderate = 10-18, and mild = 19-24 cognitive impairment.
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in Cognitive impairment of executive function
Using the Montreal Cognitive assessment. 30 items. A score of less than 26 on this assessment will indicate cognitive executive function.
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Change in Disability
The Pepper Assessment Tool for Disability will be used. Includes 5 subscales: mobility, transferring, upper extremity, instrumental and basic activities of daily living. Low scores indicate higher functioning and high independence. The Late-life function and Disability instrument will also be used. This has a 16-item disability component and a 32-item function component. Items are scored for 1-5 for function and 1-5 for frequency and extent of disability. Where high scores in frequency would represent more activity, and low scores in disability would represent less disabled.
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in likelihood of falling
Using the Dynamic Gait Index. This is an observational task that is scored on an ordinal scale. Total score per item is summed to a total score from 0(low level of function, high likelihood of falling)-24(high level of function, low likelihood of falling).
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in knee extensor strength
Using an isokinetic dynamometer, we will test Knee extensor strength. Peak torque will be calculated. A high value indicates more strength. Low values indicate less strength.
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in ankle plantarflexor strength
Using an isokinetic dynamometer, we will test ankle plantarflexor strength. Peak torque will be calculated. A high value indicates more strength. Low values indicate less strength.
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in Timed up and Go
Participants will be timed in seconds. More time to complete the task indicates low function, while less time indicates high function.
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in timed chair rise
Participants will be timed in seconds. More time to complete the task indicates low function, while less time indicates high function.
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in timed stair climb
Participants will be timed in seconds. More time to complete the task indicates low function, while less time indicates high function.
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in energetic cost of walking
This will be measured by: electrocardiogram, blood pressure, spirometry tests, and ratings of perceived exertion. The participant's maximal aerobic fitness, or oxygen consumption (VO2max) will be determined using a walking symptom-limited graded exercise test (GXT; modified walking incremental treadmill Naughton). All tests will follow the guidelines of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) with electrocardiogram (ECG) heart monitoring and periodic blood pressure measures. Open-circuit spirometry will be used to determine VO2max and carbon dioxide production. Walking time until voluntary exhaustion or pain limitation will be recorded. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) values will be collected at rest, at each exercise stage and during recovery. The treadmill tests will be performed at baseline and following the interventions.
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in Ambulatory activity
7 day assessment using an activity monitor. The device will count the number of steps taken.
Time frame: baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention