Targeted Indoor Residual Spraying Against Malaria

Overview

Since 2000, annual numbers of malaria cases in South Africa have sharply declined to about 5,000, with case numbers fairly stable since 2007. The principal malaria prevention strategy has consisted of generalised Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) of all houses in malaria endemic districts. As recent case data indicate that the levels of transmission in many districts have been reduced to very low levels, the continuation of untargeted IRS in areas where there is little or no evidence of recent transmission may be unwarranted. Efforts to eliminate malaria will only be sustainable if mass prevention efforts can be scaled down in an evidence-based manner, whilst maintaining or enhancing high sensitivity of the surveillance system of the disease. This trial will provide scientific evidence for targeted malaria prevention responding to localised transmission in pre-elimination settings, compared to continuation of generalised IRS of all houses. Two methods of IRS delivery for community malaria prevention will be compared through an open-label cluster-randomised trial consisting of two study arms with 30 clusters per arm of approximately 8,000 inhabitants per cluster. Comparison is on the basis of non-inferiority by showing that malaria incidence in the targeted IRS arm is no higher than malaria incidence in the generalised IRS arm within a specified margin of difference, and on the basis of superiority showing that the proportion of houses targeted for spraying is higher in the intervention than the reference arm. Neighbourhood investigation in response to each locally acquired case in the intervention arm, and comparison neighbourhoods in the reference arm, will include testing for antibody sero-conversion to malarial antigens to assess whether cases arise in communities with long term exposure to malaria parasites. The trial will be carried out in the South African provinces of Limpopo and Mpumalanga, in localities which have average reported incidence of malaria of \<5 cases per 1000 per annum over the past five years.

Two methods of IRS delivery for malaria prevention, targeted spraying versus annual generalised spraying, will be compared through an open-label cluster randomised trial consisting of two trial arms with 30 clusters per arm. Clusters will be artificial constructs made up of groups of spray localities or complete wards to comprise populations of about 5,000 to 10,000 persons. The unit of randomisation will be the cluster. The intervention arm of the trial will receive IRS delivery through targeted reactive spraying in the neighbourhood of recent local cases only; the reference (control) arm of the trial will receive IRS through generalised annual spraying of all structures as per standard current practice. Comparison will be on the basis of non-inferiority by showing that malaria incidence in the targeted IRS arm is no higher than malaria incidence in the generalised IRS arm within a specified margin of difference, and on the basis of superiority showing that the proportion of houses sprayed, of those targeted for spraying, is higher in the intervention than the reference arm. Neighbourhood investigation in response to each locally acquired case in the intervention arm, and comparison neighbourhoods in the reference arm will include testing for antibody sero-conversion to malarial antigens to assess whether cases arise in communities with long term exposure to malarial parasites.