Interpositional arthroplasty is by many considered to be the current gold standard for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. The results are generally good, but the rehabilitation time can be long and failures are difficult to treat. Total joint replacements now exist with modern uncemented designs that can be an alternative treatment. Short term studies show that thumb function often is better and rehabilitation time shorter, however there is uncertainty with regards to the longevity of the implants. Currently no prospective randomized trials have compared these two treatment options. Our hypothesis is that the total joint replacement will give the same results or better when compared to the interpositional arthroplasty.
Eligible: patients \>18 years with pain and dysfunction from the first cmc joint. Clinical and radiological arthritis. Exclusion: degenerative changes in the STT joint (all patients are assessed by CT), other injuries in the hand/thumb, pregnancy Outcome measures: quick-Dash, Nelson hospital score, range of motion, grip strength Complications are registered. The patients are observed for two years and the investigators aim to include a total of 40 patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
40
Burton-Pellegrini procedure
Total joint replacement
Elektra prosthesis
Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet
Oslo, Norway
quick-DASH
two-page questionnaire with VAS-scale for pain and function.
Time frame: Baseline (preoperatively), and change from baseline postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Nelson hospital score
one page thumb-specific questionnaire first published In Journal of Hand Surgery (Eur) 2007, 32E: 5: 524-528
Time frame: Baseline (preoperatively) and change from base line postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.