Background : Recently, delivery of local anaesthetics via Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus (PIEB) has been shown to improve labour epidural analgesia compared to delivery via Continuous Epidural Infusion (CEI). Purpose : However, the superiority of PIEB compared to CEI has not been investigated for third trimester voluntary termination of pregnancy. We hypothesized that PIEB administration would result in a better degree of satisfaction of the patients compared with CEI for third trimester legally induced abortion analgesia.
Abstract : The recent technical advances in antenatal diagnosis have led to an increase number of legally induced abortion at the third trimester of pregnancy. Psychological pain is frequently associated to physical pain in these kinds of interventions. So anaesthetists are more and more involved in voluntary termination of pregnancy analgesia. In France, Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) with CEI mode is usually used for voluntary termination of pregnancy analgesia. But recent studies have shown that PIEB mode as compared to CEI mode increases maternal satisfaction during labour. This may be attributed to a more extensive spread of epidural solution when delivered as a bolus rather than continuous infusion. Few trials have been interested in investigating the best mode of PCEA for legally induced abortion analgesia. This study includes women who undergo voluntary third semester termination of pregnancy. Patients are randomized to PIEB or CEI for pain analgesia. In this randomized, double-blind study, the investigators assess the degree of satisfaction of the patients (primary outcome), the incidence of motor block, total drug consumption and adverse events (secondary outcomes) between the two study groups. The different values are collected during the intervention on a specific paper for each patient and the degree of satisfaction is reported on this paper just before the patient leaves the birth room (approximatively 2 hours after the expulsion).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
37
Universiy hospital
Limoges, France
satisfaction visual analog scale (SVAS) measurment
The degree of satisfaction is assessed using a satisfaction visual analog scale (SVAS) where 0 corresponded to " completely unsatisfied " and 100 to " completely satisfied ".
Time frame: procedure
Number and intensity of motor block
Incidence of motor block determined by number and intensity
Time frame: procedure
Number of call of the aneshetist for insufficient analgesia
Number of call of the aneshetist for insufficient analgesia
Time frame: procedure
Number of doses of complementary manual bolus
Number of doses of complementary manual bolus administered
Time frame: procedure
Obstetrical informations
time of the intervention, doses of oxytocin and prostin used, instrumental delivery
Time frame: procedure
Numbers of Adverse events
Numbers of Adverse events (Pruritus, nausea / vomitings, episodes of arterial low blood pressure)
Time frame: procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.