Study Comparing Pursestring Wound Closure vs Conventional Closure to Reverse Stoma of Colorectal Cancer Patients

N/ANo Longer AvailableNCT02564224

Zhejiang University

Overview

Temporary stomas has been performed to reduce complications after colorectal cancer surgery, especially in high-risk anastomosis. Different closure technics showed different outcome. The aim of this study is to compare the scar length , surgical site infection and pain score of purse-string wound closure vs conventional closure.

Study Type

EXPANDED_ACCESS

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer Stoma Closure Technic

Interventions

Pursestring Wound ClosurePROCEDURE

Procedure: Pursestring Wound Closure

Conventional Wound ClosurePROCEDURE

Procedure: Conventional Wound Closure

proleneDEVICE

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 80 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Receiving temporary ostomy because of colorectal cancer at least 3 months ago; * Age of≥18 and ≤80 Exclusion Criteria: * Not willing or incapable to comply with all study visits and assessments * Evidence of any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding or laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that puts the patient at high risk for treatment-related complications

Locations (1)

Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University College of Medicine

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.