Aim : To assess the ability of healthy subjects and patients with a severe motor disability to voluntary control their attention Material and Methods: Population: healthy subjects, patients with brain injury Electroencephalographic study to research attentional modulation during different kind of stimulation (visual, auditory, tactile) Sudy 1: passive recording. Study 2: active recording (instruction of attentional control given to the subject). Study 3: active recording with a feedback obtained after a processing of the brain activity.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
214
electrophysiological assessment (experience 1 : passive ; experience 2 : active versus passive ; experience 3 : active, with feedback) Experience 1, 2, 3 : one session maximum by experience
electrophysiological assessment (experience 1 : passive ; experience 2 : active versus passive ; experience 3 : active, with feedback) Experience 1 : maximum one session by sensory modality of stimulation (auditory, tactile, or visual) Experience 2 : maximum one session by sensory modality of stimulation (auditory, tactile, or visual) Experience 3 : Stimulation = auditory or visual ; possibility of several sessions if the patient is tired.
Centre Médical de L'argentière
Aveize, France
Centre Hospitalier Georges Claudinon
Le Chambon-Feugerolles, France
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, France
Research of statistical differences between sensory evoked potentials in attentional oriented condition and distracted condition
stastical analysis allowing to compare evoked responses during different stimulation condition (attentionnaly oriented versus attentionnally distracted versus passive condition = no instruction to the subject). These comparisons are made either for one single subject and at the group level. Analysis mainly concerns the differences in amplitude variation between the differents evoked potentials on several electrods of interest. These can vary between patients because of the different topographies of lesions and because of the different adaptative strategies. The statiscal difference will be assessed by a randomization test (also called "permutation test") wich allow to assess how high is the risk that the observed difference between the evoked potential (amplitude, variance) is due to chance or not
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 years
Online and offline accuracy
percentage of correct answers with the brain-computer interface (BCI). A "correct answer" is recorded each time the feedback of the BCI match the command sended by the subject controlling the BCI. This analysis can be done online and offline. Online accuracy is recorded in real-time during the session with the subject. offline accuracy is obtained a posteriori of the experiment, to test the impact on accuracy of the changes in different parameters (stimuli duration, numbers of spatial filtering, change of classifiers, etc.).
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 years.
Clinical scale score ("Evaluation de la Communication des patients en Eveil de Coma" (ECEC) scale)
this clinical scale allow to obtain an outcome measure of the investissment, the communication themes and the communication modes of the patient. The final global value range between 0 and 44.
Time frame: an average of 3 years (At the group level)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon
Lyon, France
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, France
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, France
APHP - Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière
Paris, France
APHP - Hôpital Raymond Poincaré
Paris, France
Hôpital Nord CHU Saint Etienne
Saint-Etienne, France
Hospices civils de Lyon, Hôpital Henry Gabrielle,
Saint-Genis-Laval, France
...and 1 more locations