The aim of this randomized, controlled, multi-center study is to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of using a Straumann® Bone Level Tapered implant for immediate implantation following extraction of a tooth in the pre-molar and anterior region of the maxilla and mandible (test) compared to the outcomes of placing this implant in healed sites (control).
The primary objective is to demonstrate that the change in mean peri-implant marginal bone level changes (mesial and distal) from loading to 12 months post-loading of the test treatment will not be worse than the control treatments. The secondary objectives of the study are to assess differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes between the test and control treatments at 12 months post-loading by looking at implant success and survival, buccal bone dimensional changes, implant stability, soft tissue changes, subject satisfaction, and adverse events. An additional objective is to assess long-term differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes, as measured in the primary and secondary objectives, over the span of two, three, four, and five years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
53
Immediate placement of a Straumann Bone Level Tapered Dental Implant for replacement of a singe tooth.
Delayed placement of a Straumann Bone Level Tapered Dental Implant for replacement of a singe tooth.
UCLA School of Dentistry
Los Angeles, California, United States
Center for Implant Dentistry, University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Mean Crestal Bone Level Change
mean crestal bone level at 12 months - mean crestal bone level at implant loading (baseline) = Change in crestal bone level
Time frame: Measured at implant loading (10-12 weeks after implant surgery) and 12 months post-loading
Implant Success and Survival
Control group N-25 Test group N=24 Survival and success was assessed by the dimensions below as noted by Buser. * Absence of persistent subjective complaints, such as pain, foreign body sensation, and/ or dysesthesia * Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration * Absence of mobility * Absence of a continuous radiolucency around the implant
Time frame: 12 months post-loading
Buccal Bone Dimensional Changes
Buccal bone dimensional changes were measured on images recorded on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The average of the following measurement locations is reported as outcome variable: 1\) mesial to distal; 2) distal-buccal; 3) mid-buccal; 4) mesial-buccal; 5) distal-lingual; 6) mid-lingual; 7) mesial-lingual.
Time frame: Measured at Implant loading and at screening and 12 months post-loading
Implant Measure as Measured by ISQ at Implant Surgery
Implant stability as measured by ISQ held facial-lingual and held mesial-lingual. An Osstell device that uses the Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) method to determine implant stability and osseointegration was used in the study. The results were presented as an Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) value of 1 - 100. The higher the ISQ, the more stable the implant. Additional information about the Osstell device can be found at www.osstell.com. Instructions on taking the measurements for this protocol will be provided in the Operation Manual. Two measurements were taken from two different angles at implant placement, implant loading, and final restoration.
Time frame: Implant surgery: Immediate Placement for Test Group = implant is placed at the time of tooth extraction. Delayed Placement is Control Group= implant is placed after 16-18 weeks of healing
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Implant Stability as Measured by ISQ at Implant Loading
Implant stability was measured by ISQ and probe held facial-lingual and held mesial-lingual. An Osstell device is an instrument that uses the Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) method to determine implant stability and osseointegration. The result is presented as an Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) value of 1 - 100. The higher the ISQ, the more stable the implant. Additional information about the Osstell device can be found at www.osstell.com. Instructions on taking the measurements for this protocol will be provided in the Operation Manual. Two measurements will be taken from two different angles at implant placement, implant loading, and final restoration.
Time frame: Implant Loading=implant surgery + 10 weeks (+/-3 weeks)
Implant Stability as Measured by ISQ at Final Restoration
Implant stability was measured by ISQ and probe held facial-lingual and held mesial-lingual. An Osstell device is an instrument that uses the Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) method to determine implant stability and osseointegration. The result is presented as an Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) value of 1 - 100. The higher the ISQ, the more stable the implant. Additional information about the Osstell device can be found at www.osstell.com. Instructions on taking the measurements for this protocol will be provided in the Operation Manual. Two measurements will be taken from two different angles at implant placement, implant loading, and final restoration.
Time frame: Final Restoration: 10 weeks post-loading (± 2 weeks)
Change in Soft Tissue Measurements
The following table illustrates a comparison between Soft Tissue Mean Changes Around the Implant for delayed and immediate placements, measured at final restoration (10 weeks post loading) and the 12-month mark post implant loading. The parameters assessed included: CLTm (length of crown from highest point of soft tissue to incisal edge of the adjacent mesial tooth), CLTd (length of crown from highest point of soft tissue to incisal edge of the adjacent distal tooth), CLI (length of the implant crown from highest point of the soft tissue margin to the incisal edge), IPm (distance from the top of the papilla to the incisal edge mesial of the implant crown), IPd (distance from the top of the papilla to the incisal edge distal of the implant crown)
Time frame: Soft tissue measurements were taken and compared between the test and the control group at final restoration (10 weeks post loading) and 12 months (± 1 month) post implant loading (implant loading=implant surgery + 10 weeks (+/-3 weeks)).
Subject Satisfaction
Subject satisfaction related to pain, crown's esthetic, and crown's function was assessed at 12 months post-loading using Visual Analog Scales (VAS). Satisfaction range between 0 to 100 with Excruciating and Not satisfied at all at zero point and Nonexistent and Extremely satisfied at the 100 point. The table summarizes pain, satisfaction with function and satisfaction with esthetics at 12-months post loading.
Time frame: 12 months post-loading
Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Adverse Device Effects Over 12 Months
The frequency of adverse events and adverse device effects will be determined at 12 months post-loading and compared between the test and control arms. There were 38 total Adverse Events in 18 subjects out of 53 subjects. There were no SAEs related to procedure or device.
Time frame: Measured at each study visit and throughout 12 months