The research project "SEAL-DK" is focusing on advantages and disadvantages of two treatment strategies: non-invasive fissure sealing and invasive restorative treatment of manifest occlusal caries lesions in permanent teeth in children and adolescents. The purpose of the project is to promote the understanding of the possibilities of non-invasive treatment of occlusal caries lesions in the permanent dentition, and to increase the present knowledge about the optimal threshold for sealing or restoration, respectively, when treating such lesions. The project is carried out as a randomized study of the two treatment strategies: non-invasive versus invasive treatment of occlusal caries. When organizing the study, it is emphasized that no treatment shall be carried out, if conflicting the participating dentists' perception of clinically proper caries treatment, and that the results shall have a high reliability and consistency. The hypothesis is that caries progression can be stopped by non-invasive fissure sealing changing the threshold and postponing the time for invasive restoration.
Background: The first restoration is fatal for the prognosis of the tooth. Studies have shown that caries progression can be stopped with a tight sealing which may even lead to re-mineralization of lesions. Aim: To investigate the possibility of treating manifest occlusal caries with non-invasive sealing instead of conventional resin restoration. Study design: the study is carried out as a prospective, randomized clinical study (RCT). Primary, occlusal caries lesions in 521 patients, aged 6-17 years old were treated by non-invasive resin based sealing (n= 368) or resin based restoration (n=153). The dentists or patients were not free to choose the treatment type. Randomization between sealing and restoration (2:1) was made by computer for each practitioner at the University of Copenhagen and kept at the clinics in sealed envelopes. The treatments are examined clinically and radiographically after 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years. The treatments are performed and controlled by 68 general practitioners from Public Dental Health Care Service in 9 Danish municipalities. Sealing: The dentists use material of own choice, and follow their usual clinical procedures based on the instructions from the manufacturer and the guidelines from The Department of Cariology and Endodontics, University of Copenhagen. Restoration: The dentists use preparation design and material of own choice, and follow their usual clinical procedures based on the instructions from the manufacturer and the guidelines from The Department of Cariology and Endodontics, University of Copenhagen. The prevalence of regression, arrest and progression of sealed and restored caries lesions, are computed and related to the clinical and radiological registrations of patient, dentist or treatment related factors for assessing of statistically significant correlations. The influence of each factor on the quality, longevity and need for retreatment of occlusal sealants and restorations, will be assessed using non-parametric tests and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses for statistical treatment of data, supplemented with summarizing multivariate survival analyses such as the Cox regression model and discriminatory analyses.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
521
The dentists use resin based fissure sealants of own choice, and follow their usual clinical procedures based on the instructions from the manufacturer and the guidelines from The Department of Cariology and Endodontics, University of Copenhagen, DK
The dentists use preparation design and resin composites of own choice, and follow their usual clinical procedures based on the instructions from the manufacturer and the guidelines from The Department of Cariology and Endodontics, University of Copenhagen, DK
Effectiveness of fissure sealants
Radiographical scoring system: 1\) Regression in depth of lesion (success) 2: Unchanged depth of lesion (success) 3: Progression in depth of lesion (failure)
Time frame: 10 years
Longevity of fissure sealants
Clinical scoring system: 1\) Intact sealing without caries progression (success) 2: Loss of sealant with or without caries progression (failure)
Time frame: 10 years
Effectiveness of resin based restoration
Radiographical scoring system: 1\) Unchanged depth of lesion (success) 2: Progression in depth of lesion (failure)
Time frame: 10 years
Longevity of resin based restoration
Clinical scoring system: 1\) Intact restoration without caries progression (success) 2: Defect restoration with or without caries progression (failure)
Time frame: 10
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.