CPC REGISTRY is a multi-center, international, prospective, open-label, observational study on the use of injectable calcium phosphate cements for the treatment of bone defects in adults. All patients will be treated with any of the two injectable calcium phosphate bone substitutes (GRAFTYS®HBS/GRAFTYS®Quickset or their private labels) according to standard clinical practice and according to the information provided by GRAFTYS manufacturer in respective device Instructions For Use (IFU).
The objective of this observational prospective study is to collect safety and performance data relating to the use of injectable Calcium Phosphate Cements "GRAFTYS®HBS/GRAFTYS®Quickset (or their private labels)" in routine clinical practice from various international hospitals. Therefore this observational study will allow to support data about risk management (established at the end of the product development); and to enhance the current clinical evaluation of products with new clinical data (for longer follow-up). The collected data of this observational study will be "non-identifying data". The patient must have signed a Written Consent Form (for data collection) prior to any data being entered into the electronic Case Report Form. Patients will be followed as per local standard medical practices of the center for two years. Five follow-up visits/phone calls will be collected (at 3 months (+/-14 days), 6 months (+/- 14 days), 9 months (+/-21 days), 12 months (+/- 30 days) and 24 months (+/-60 days)). Each visit/phone call includes the collection of Adverse Events, the measurement of health status (quality of life and functional scores) and the X-ray scoring (if X-ray imaging is available). No additional exams (other than the routine clinical practice) are requested. The surgeons have to follow their usual practices (e.g. X-Rays have to be performed only if they are scheduled in the routine clinical practice). All Adverse Events will be collected and monitored at each follow-up visit or follow-up phone call. All Serious Adverse Events must be described via a Serious Adverse Event form in e-CRF and all Adverse Device Effects must be described via a "Product Complaint Form" in e-CRF. Descriptive analyses will be performed in order to describe: nature of adverse events, their distribution and frequency. Moreover, all factors which may appear predictive for the rate of adverse events will be analyzed (age, sex, amount of CPC injected, delivery system used, diabetes history, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, concomitant treatments/diseases…). For all time-dependent events, life-tables will be able to calculate using the Kaplan Meier estimate method, for a period starting on the date of the procedure up to and including the 24-months follow-up visit.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
500
Hôpital La Timone
Marseille, France
RECRUITINGUnnamed facility
Marseille, France
RECRUITINGUnnamed facility
Paris, France
Adverse Device Effect rate
Rate of Adverse Events related to bone substitutes (registry devices) for the follow-up period of patients.
Time frame: For 24 months
Technical Success rate
Technical Success rate defined as successful delivery of the bone substitute in the target defect bone without evidence of delivery device or bone substitute malfunction. (NOTE: Malfunction is definied as a failure of the medical device to perform in accordance with its intended purpose when used in accordance with the Instructions For Uses (IFU)).
Time frame: At surgical procedure
Device Deficiencies rate
Device deficiency is defined as an inadequacy of a medical device with respect to its identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety or performance. NOTE: Device deficiencies include malfunctions, use errors, and inadequate labelling.
Time frame: At surgical procedure
Serious Adverse Events rate in the peroperative period
Serious Adverse Event is defined as any adverse event that: 1. Led to a death, 2. Led to serious deterioration in health of the subject that either resulted in: 1. a life-threatening illness or injury, or 2. a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or 3. in-patient or prolonged hospitalization, or 4. medical or surgical intervention to prevent life-threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. 3. Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect.
Time frame: At surgical procedure
Serious Adverse Events rate during the follow-up period
Serious Adverse Event is defined as any adverse event that: 1. Led to a death, 2. Led to serious deterioration in health of the subject that either resulted in: 1. a life-threatening illness or injury, or 2. a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or 3. in-patient or prolonged hospitalization, or 4. medical or surgical intervention to prevent life-threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. 3. Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Unnamed facility
Saint-Louis, France
RECRUITINGUnnamed facility
Kiel, Germany
RECRUITINGUnnamed facility
Ratzeburg, Germany
RECRUITINGUnnamed facility
Würzburg, Germany
RECRUITINGUnnamed facility
Palermo, Italy
RECRUITINGUnnamed facility
Piacenza, Italy
RECRUITINGUnnamed facility
Fort-de-France, Martinique
RECRUITING...and 1 more locations
Time frame: 3 months post index procedure
Serious Adverse Events rate during the follow-up period
Serious Adverse Event is defined as any adverse event that: 1. Led to a death, 2. Led to serious deterioration in health of the subject that either resulted in: 1. a life-threatening illness or injury, or 2. a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or 3. in-patient or prolonged hospitalization, or 4. medical or surgical intervention to prevent life-threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. 3. Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect.
Time frame: 6 months post index procedure
Serious Adverse Events rate during the follow-up period
Serious Adverse Event is defined as any adverse event that: 1. Led to a death, 2. Led to serious deterioration in health of the subject that either resulted in: 1. a life-threatening illness or injury, or 2. a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or 3. in-patient or prolonged hospitalization, or 4. medical or surgical intervention to prevent life-threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. 3. Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect.
Time frame: 9 months post index procedure
Serious Adverse Events rate during the follow-up period
Serious Adverse Event is defined as any adverse event that: 1. Led to a death, 2. Led to serious deterioration in health of the subject that either resulted in: 1. a life-threatening illness or injury, or 2. a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or 3. in-patient or prolonged hospitalization, or 4. medical or surgical intervention to prevent life-threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. 3. Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect.
Time frame: 12 months post index procedure
Serious Adverse Events rate during the follow-up period
Serious Adverse Event is defined as any adverse event that: 1. Led to a death, 2. Led to serious deterioration in health of the subject that either resulted in: 1. a life-threatening illness or injury, or 2. a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or 3. in-patient or prolonged hospitalization, or 4. medical or surgical intervention to prevent life-threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. 3. Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect.
Time frame: 24 months post index procedure
Bone reconstruction evolution after surgery (if X-rays are available)
X-ray scoring systems have been implemented according to the medical literature criteria. For trauma defects/arthrodesis, the results are scored using the criteria proposed by Lane and Sandhu (bone formation, union and remodeling) and also including a bone substitute resorption (radiolucency) criteria. As for prosthesis revision/cavity defects, the scoring system includes bone substitute resorption, bone formation, remodeling and presence or absence of a radiolucent line between the bone and the cement/implant. The maximum score for both groups (trauma/arthrodesis \& cavity filling/arthroplasty) is 10/10 (excellent consolidation/excellent secondary stabilization) and the minimum score is 0/10 (no consolidation/no secondary stabilization).
Time frame: 3 months post index procedure
Bone reconstruction evolution after surgery (if X-rays are available)
X-ray scoring systems have been implemented according to the medical literature criteria. For trauma defects/arthrodesis, the results are scored using the criteria proposed by Lane and Sandhu (bone formation, union and remodeling) and also including a bone substitute resorption (radiolucency) criteria. As for prosthesis revision/cavity defects, the scoring system includes bone substitute resorption, bone formation, remodeling and presence or absence of a radiolucent line between the bone and the cement/implant. The maximum score for both groups (trauma/arthrodesis \& cavity filling/arthroplasty) is 10/10 (excellent consolidation/excellent secondary stabilization) and the minimum score is 0/10 (no consolidation/no secondary stabilization).
Time frame: 6 months post index procedure
Bone reconstruction evolution after surgery (if X-rays are available)
X-ray scoring systems have been implemented according to the medical literature criteria. For trauma defects/arthrodesis, the results are scored using the criteria proposed by Lane and Sandhu (bone formation, union and remodeling) and also including a bone substitute resorption (radiolucency) criteria. As for prosthesis revision/cavity defects, the scoring system includes bone substitute resorption, bone formation, remodeling and presence or absence of a radiolucent line between the bone and the cement/implant. The maximum score for both groups (trauma/arthrodesis \& cavity filling/arthroplasty) is 10/10 (excellent consolidation/excellent secondary stabilization) and the minimum score is 0/10 (no consolidation/no secondary stabilization).
Time frame: 9 months post index procedure
Bone reconstruction evolution after surgery (if X-rays are available)
X-ray scoring systems have been implemented according to the medical literature criteria. For trauma defects/arthrodesis, the results are scored using the criteria proposed by Lane and Sandhu (bone formation, union and remodeling) and also including a bone substitute resorption (radiolucency) criteria. As for prosthesis revision/cavity defects, the scoring system includes bone substitute resorption, bone formation, remodeling and presence or absence of a radiolucent line between the bone and the cement/implant. The maximum score for both groups (trauma/arthrodesis \& cavity filling/arthroplasty) is 10/10 (excellent consolidation/excellent secondary stabilization) and the minimum score is 0/10 (no consolidation/no secondary stabilization).
Time frame: 12 months post index procedure
Bone reconstruction evolution after surgery (if X-rays are available)
X-ray scoring systems have been implemented according to the medical literature criteria. For trauma defects/arthrodesis, the results are scored using the criteria proposed by Lane and Sandhu (bone formation, union and remodeling) and also including a bone substitute resorption (radiolucency) criteria. As for prosthesis revision/cavity defects, the scoring system includes bone substitute resorption, bone formation, remodeling and presence or absence of a radiolucent line between the bone and the cement/implant. The maximum score for both groups (trauma/arthrodesis \& cavity filling/arthroplasty) is 10/10 (excellent consolidation/excellent secondary stabilization) and the minimum score is 0/10 (no consolidation/no secondary stabilization).
Time frame: 24 months post index procedure
Quality of life score at baseline (EQ-5D-3L)
This health status information is collected before and after a procedure and provides an indication of the clinical outcomes or quality of care delivered to patients. EQ-5D-3L paper questionnaire will be self-administered or it will be administered to patient via a telephone interview. The EQ-5D-5L still consists of 2 parts - the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ VAS. The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. EQ VAS is a scale on which the "best imaginable health state" is marked 100 and the "worst imaginable state" is marked 0.
Time frame: At baseline (pre-operative)
Quality of life score evolution after surgery (EQ-5D-3L)
This health status information is collected before and after a procedure and provides an indication of the clinical outcomes or quality of care delivered to patients. EQ-5D-3L paper questionnaire will be self-administered or it will be administered to patient via a telephone interview. The EQ-5D-5L still consists of 2 parts - the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ VAS. The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. EQ VAS is a scale on which the "best imaginable health state" is marked 100 and the "worst imaginable state" is marked 0.
Time frame: 3 months post index procedure
Quality of life score evolution after surgery (EQ-5D-3L)
This health status information is collected before and after a procedure and provides an indication of the clinical outcomes or quality of care delivered to patients. EQ-5D-3L paper questionnaire will be self-administered or it will be administered to patient via a telephone interview. The EQ-5D-5L still consists of 2 parts - the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ VAS. The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. EQ VAS is a scale on which the "best imaginable health state" is marked 100 and the "worst imaginable state" is marked 0.
Time frame: 6 months post index procedure
Quality of life score evolution after surgery (EQ-5D-3L)
This health status information is collected before and after a procedure and provides an indication of the clinical outcomes or quality of care delivered to patients. EQ-5D-3L paper questionnaire will be self-administered or it will be administered to patient via a telephone interview. The EQ-5D-5L still consists of 2 parts - the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ VAS. The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. EQ VAS is a scale on which the "best imaginable health state" is marked 100 and the "worst imaginable state" is marked 0.
Time frame: 9 months post index procedure
Quality of life score evolution after surgery (EQ-5D-3L)
This health status information is collected before and after a procedure and provides an indication of the clinical outcomes or quality of care delivered to patients. EQ-5D-3L paper questionnaire will be self-administered or it will be administered to patient via a telephone interview. The EQ-5D-5L still consists of 2 parts - the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ VAS. The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. EQ VAS is a scale on which the "best imaginable health state" is marked 100 and the "worst imaginable state" is marked 0.
Time frame: 12 months post index procedure
Quality of life score evolution after surgery (EQ-5D-3L)
This health status information is collected before and after a procedure and provides an indication of the clinical outcomes or quality of care delivered to patients. EQ-5D-3L paper questionnaire will be self-administered or it will be administered to patient via a telephone interview. The EQ-5D-5L still consists of 2 parts - the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ VAS. The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. EQ VAS is a scale on which the "best imaginable health state" is marked 100 and the "worst imaginable state" is marked 0.
Time frame: 24 months post index procedure
Functional score at baseline (if applicable according to the type of bone defect/medical indication).
Functional scores are used to monitor the patient progress. The questionnaires concern the degree of difficulty (level of function) that the patient experienced in performing usual daily activities and higher level activities due to his bone defect. Therefore, the type of functional score depends on the skeletal region impacted by the bone defect: * Hand/wrist/ elbow/shoulder: Quick-DASH score (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder \& Hand). * Knee: KOOS-PS (Knee Injury \& Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- Physical function Short form) * Hip: HOOS-PS (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- Physical function Short form) * Foot/Ankle: Kitaoka \& al's criteria, AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale; Forefoot Scale; Midfoot scale.
Time frame: At baseline (pre-operative)
Functional score evolution after surgery (if applicable according to the type of bone defect/medical indication).
Functional scores are used to monitor the patient progress. The questionnaires concern the degree of difficulty (level of function) that the patient experienced in performing usual daily activities and higher level activities due to his bone defect. Therefore, the type of functional score depends on the skeletal region impacted by the bone defect: * Hand/wrist/ elbow/shoulder: Quick-DASH score (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder \& Hand). * Knee: KOOS-PS (Knee Injury \& Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- Physical function Short form) * Hip: HOOS-PS (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- Physical function Short form) * Foot/Ankle: Kitaoka \& al's criteria, AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale; Forefoot Scale; Midfoot scale.
Time frame: 3 months post index procedure
Functional score evolution after surgery (if applicable according to the type of bone defect/medical indication).
Functional scores are used to monitor the patient progress. The questionnaires concern the degree of difficulty (level of function) that the patient experienced in performing usual daily activities and higher level activities due to his bone defect. Therefore, the type of functional score depends on the skeletal region impacted by the bone defect: * Hand/wrist/ elbow/shoulder: Quick-DASH score (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder \& Hand). * Knee: KOOS-PS (Knee Injury \& Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- Physical function Short form) * Hip: HOOS-PS (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- Physical function Short form) * Foot/Ankle: Kitaoka \& al's criteria, AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale; Forefoot Scale; Midfoot scale.
Time frame: 6 months post index procedure
Functional score evolution after surgery (if applicable according to the type of bone defect/medical indication).
Functional scores are used to monitor the patient progress. The questionnaires concern the degree of difficulty (level of function) that the patient experienced in performing usual daily activities and higher level activities due to his bone defect. Therefore, the type of functional score depends on the skeletal region impacted by the bone defect: * Hand/wrist/ elbow/shoulder: Quick-DASH score (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder \& Hand). * Knee: KOOS-PS (Knee Injury \& Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- Physical function Short form) * Hip: HOOS-PS (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- Physical function Short form) * Foot/Ankle: Kitaoka \& al's criteria, AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale; Forefoot Scale; Midfoot scale.
Time frame: 9 months post index procedure
Functional score evolution after surgery (if applicable according to the type of bone defect/medical indication).
Functional scores are used to monitor the patient progress. The questionnaires concern the degree of difficulty (level of function) that the patient experienced in performing usual daily activities and higher level activities due to his bone defect. Therefore, the type of functional score depends on the skeletal region impacted by the bone defect: * Hand/wrist/ elbow/shoulder: Quick-DASH score (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder \& Hand). * Knee: KOOS-PS (Knee Injury \& Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- Physical function Short form) * Hip: HOOS-PS (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- Physical function Short form) * Foot/Ankle: Kitaoka \& al's criteria, AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale; Forefoot Scale; Midfoot scale.
Time frame: 12 months post index procedure
Functional score evolution after surgery (if applicable according to the type of bone defect/medical indication).
Functional scores are used to monitor the patient progress. The questionnaires concern the degree of difficulty (level of function) that the patient experienced in performing usual daily activities and higher level activities due to his bone defect. Therefore, the type of functional score depends on the skeletal region impacted by the bone defect: * Hand/wrist/ elbow/shoulder: Quick-DASH score (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder \& Hand). * Knee: KOOS-PS (Knee Injury \& Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- Physical function Short form) * Hip: HOOS-PS (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- Physical function Short form) * Foot/Ankle: Kitaoka \& al's criteria, AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale; Forefoot Scale; Midfoot scale.
Time frame: 24 months post index procedure
Surgeon's Satisfaction survey with registry device
Surgeon's Satisfaction survey with registry device (about mixing ability, injecting ability and moldability) thanks to a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score of zero indicated absolutely inacceptable, while a score of 100 indicated very satisfying.
Time frame: At surgical procedure