A Phase 3 global study comparing avelumab alone to avelumab plus PLD and to PLD alone to demonstrate that avelumab given alone or in combination with PLD is superior to PLD alone in prolonging Overall Survival in patients with platinum resistant/platinum refractory ovarian cancer.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
566
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. OS time was summarized by treatment arm using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of deaths from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 30 months (based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018).
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
PFS is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of progression of disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS time was summarized by treatment arm using the Kaplan-Meier method. PFS based on BICR assessment was evaluated for this endpoint.
Time frame: From randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause whichever was first (up to 30 months); based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on BICR Assessment
Percentage of participants achieved objective response (OR) based on BICR assessment is presented for this endpoint. OR is defined as a complete response (CR, disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR, \>=30% decrease under the baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions) according to the RECIST (version 1.1) recorded from randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause. Both CR and PR must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response are first met and before the first documentation of disease progression. Only tumor assessments performed on or before the start date of any further anti-cancer therapies are considered in the assessment of best overall response.
Time frame: Tumor assessments as assessed by BICR were conducted at every 8 weeks from screening until documented disease progression (approximately up to 30 months); based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC - HAL
Chandler, Arizona, United States
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC - HAL
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC - HAL
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC - HAL
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC-HAL
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC - HOPE
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC - HOPE
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Highlands Oncology Group
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
Highlands Oncology Group
Rogers, Arkansas, United States
University of California, Irvine/UC Irvine Health
Orange, California, United States
...and 285 more locations
ORR Based on Investigator Assessment
Percentage of participants achieved OR based on investigator assessment is presented for this endpoint. OR is defined as a CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (\>=30% decrease under the baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions) according to the RECIST (version 1.1) recorded from randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause. The ORR on each randomized treatment arm were estimated by dividing the number of participants with OR (CR or PR) by number of participants randomized to the respective treatment arm.
Time frame: Tumor assessments as assessed by investigator were conducted at every 8 weeks from screening until documented disease progression, up to 30 months; based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
PFS Based on Investigator Assessment According to RECIST Version 1.1
PFS is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS time was summarized by treatment arm using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause whichever was first (up to 30 months); based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
Duration of Response (DR) Based on BICR Assessment
DR is defined, for participants with an OR per RECIST version 1.1, as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR \[disappearance of all target lesions\] or PR \[\>=30% decrease under the baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions\]) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: Tumor assessments as assessed by investigator were conducted at every 8 weeks from screening until documented disease progression, up to 30 months; based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
DR Based on Investigator Assessment
DR is defined, for participants with an OR per RECIST version 1.1, as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR \[disappearance of all target lesions\] or PR \[\>=30% decrease under the baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions\]) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: Tumor assessments as assessed by investigator were conducted at every 8 weeks from screening until documented disease progression, up to 30 months; based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
Disease Control (DC) Rate Based on BICR Assessment
Percentage of participants achieving DC based on BICR assessment is presented in this endpoint. DC is a best overall response of CR (disappearance of all target lesions), PR (\>=30% decrease under the baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions), non-complete response/non-progressive disease or stable disease (SD) according to the RECIST version 1.1.
Time frame: Tumor assessments as assessed by investigator were conducted at every 8 weeks from screening until documented disease progression, up to 30 months; based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
DC Rate Based on Investigator Assessment
Percentage of participants achieving DC based on investigator assessment is presented in this endpoint. DC is a best overall response of CR (disappearance of all target lesions), PR (\>=30% decrease under the baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions), non-complete response/non-progressive disease or SD according to the RECIST version 1.1.
Time frame: Tumor assessments as assessed by investigator were conducted at every 8 weeks from screening until documented disease progression, up to 30 months; based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation patient administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life-threatening; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; progression of the malignancy under study. Treatment emergent AEs are those events with onset dates occurring during the on-treatment period for the first time, or if the worsening of an event is during the on-treatment period.
Time frame: From the time of the first dose of study treatment through a minimum of 30 days + last dose of study treatment, start day of new anti-cancer therapy -1 day (up to 70 months); based on cutoff date: 13 July 2022.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
The number of participants with following laboratory abnormalities meeting any of the Grades 1 to 4 classified according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) toxicity grading version 4.03 were summarized: hematology (anemia, lymphocyte count decreased, neutrophil count decreased; and platelet count decreased) and chemistry laboratory tests (creatinine increased; serum amylase increased and lipase increased).
Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment/withdrawal visit, up to 2.7 years, based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs - Blood Pressure
Vital signs included blood pressure and pulse rate. Changes from baseline in sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were summarized.
Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment/withdrawal visit, up to 2.7 years, based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs - Pulse Rate
Vital signs included blood pressure and pulse rate. Changes from baseline in sitting pulse rate were summarized.
Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment/withdrawal visit, up to 2.7 years, based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Categorical summarization ECG criteria were as follows: 1) QT interval, QTcB, QTcF and QTcP: increase from baseline \>30 ms or 60 ms; absolute value \> 450 ms, \>480 ms and \> 500 ms; 2) heart rate (HR): change from baseline \>=20 bpm and absolute value \<=50 bpm or \>=120 bpm; 3) PR interval: absolute value \>=220 ms and increase from baseline \>=20 ms; 4) QRS: \>= 120 ms.
Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment/withdrawal visit, up to 2.7 years, based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
Number of Participants With % Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decrease From Baseline
LVEF decrease was summarized by multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA)/ echocardiogram (ECHO) parameter. Participants with a LVEF% \>=10 points and \>= 15 points decrease from baseline during the on-treatment period were summarized.
Time frame: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1 (repeated every 2 cycles) to the end of treatment/withdrawal visit, based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
Number of Participants With PD-L1 Expression for PFS (Based on BICR Assessment) and for OS
PD-L1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Participants were considered positive for PD-L1 if their baseline tissue sample demonstrated PD-L1 expression on \>=1% of tumor cells or \>=5% of immune cells.
Time frame: Biomarkers are measured only at screening.
Number of Participants With CD8 Expression for PFS (Based on BICR Assessment) and for OS
Tumor infiltrating CD8 positive (CD8+) T lymphocytes was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Participants were considered positive for CD8 T cells if their baseline tissue sample demonstrated presence of \>=1% CD8+ cells across the area of the tumor.
Time frame: Biomarkers are measured only at screening.
Number of Participants With Improved, Stable and Deterioration Based on 10-Point Change for EORTC QLQ-C30 Global QoL
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30 question survey and includes 5 functional domain subscales, global health status/quality of life, disease/treatment related symptoms, and the perceived financial impact of disease. Higher scores are reflective of a greater presence of symptoms.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of each subsequent cycle, end of treatment/withdrawal visit and the 30, 60 and 90 days safety follow up visits, based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
Time to Deterioration in Abdominal/GI Symptom Subscale of EORTC QLQ-OV28
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Ovarian Cancer 28 (EORTC QLQ-OV28) is a 28 item instrument with 7 functional domain subscales. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomization to the first time the participant's score showed a 15-point or higher increase in the score of the abdominal/GI symptom subscale of the EORTC QLQ-OV28.
Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 to prior to end of treatment/withdrawal visit, based on cutoff date: 19 September 2018.
Change From Baseline in EQ-VAS Score at End of Treatment
The EuroQol- 5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire consists of the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (the EuroQol-visual analogue scale \[EQ-VAS\]). The respondent's self-rated health is assessed on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state) by the EQ-VAS.
Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment/withdrawal visit
Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) For Avelumab Following Cycle 2 Day 1 Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) Dose
Ctrough was defined as predose concentration during multiple dosing, and can be observed directly from data.
Time frame: At predose (0 H) on Cycle 2 Day 1
Serum Maximum Concentration (Cmax) For Avelumab Following Cycle 2 Day 1 PLD Dose
Cmax was defined as maximum observed serum concentration, and can be observed directly from data.
Time frame: At postdose (end of infusion, 1H) on Cycle 2 Day 1
Cmax For Doxorubicin Following Cycle 2 Day 1 PLD Dose
Cmax was defined as maximum observed serum concentration, and can be observed directly from data.
Time frame: From predose (0 H) of Cycle 2 Day 1 through 336 hours postdose
Area Under The Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC24) For Doxorubicin Following Cycle 2 Day 1 PLD Dose
AUC24 was defined as area under the concentration time profile from time zero to 24 hours.
Time frame: From 0 through 24 hours postdose
Area Under The Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero to 336 Hours (AUC336) For Doxorubicin Following Cycle 2 Day 1 PLD Dose
AUC336 was defined as area under the concentration time profile from time zero to 336 hours.
Time frame: From predose (0 H) of Cycle 2 Day 1 through 336 hours postdose
Area Under The Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero to The Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) For Doxorubicin Following Cycle 2 Day 1 PLD Dose
AUClast was defined as area under the concentration time profile from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (Clast).
Time frame: From predose (0 H) of Cycle 2 Day 1 through 336 hours postdose
Number of Participants With Treatment-Boosted Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA)
Treatment-boosted ADA was defined as a positive ADA result at baseline and the titer ≥ 8×baseline titer at least once after treatment with avelumab.
Time frame: At predose (0 H) of select cycles starting from Cycle 1 through Cycle 24, at end of treatment and 30 days after the last dose of avelumab
Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced ADA
Treatment-induced ADA was defined as participant who was ADA-negative at baseline and has at least one positive post-baseline ADA result; or if participant did not have a baseline sample, the participant had at least one positive past-baseline ADA result.
Time frame: At predose (0 H) of select cycles starting from Cycle 1 through Cycle 24, at end of treatment and 30 days after the last dose of avelumab
Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced Neutralizing Antibody (nAb)
Treatment-induced nAb was defined as participant who was not nAb positive at baseline and had at least one positive post-baseline nAb result; or if participant did not have a baseline sample, the participant had at least one positive past-baseline ADA result.
Time frame: At predose (0 H) of select cycles starting from Cycle 1 through Cycle 24, at end of treatment and 30 days after the last dose of avelumab