This study was done to see if the combination of two anti-HIV medicines, dolutegravir (DTG, Tivicay) and lamivudine (3TC, Epivir) taken once a day, provide a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment for HIV. DTG is a type of HIV medicine called an integrase inhibitor; 3TC is a type of HIV medicine called a reverse transcriptase inhibitor. DTG works by blocking integrase and 3TC works by blocking reverse transcriptase, two HIV proteins (enzymes). This prevents HIV from multiplying and lowers the viral load (amount of HIV in the blood). Both DTG and 3TC are currently part of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended regimens along with a third active drug. Since some HIV medicines have side effects and are costly, there is interest in whether HIV can be successfully controlled with fewer than three HIV drugs.
This study was a phase II, single-arm, open-label pilot study designed to estimate the efficacy of dolutegravir (DTG) plus lamivudine (3TC) as initial combination ART (antiretroviral therapy) in HIV-1 infected treatment naive participants. The target enrollment was 120 participants with a cap of N=90 participants with screening HIV-1 RNA \<= 100,000 copies/mL. The study aimed to enroll \>= 20% women. The expected follow-up for each participant was 52 weeks. Visits occurred at screening, entry, and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52 from study entry. All signs/symptoms within 30 days prior to entry were recorded. Subsequently, grade 2 or higher rash and all other grade 3 or higher signs and symptoms were recorded. All participants underwent routine monitoring including plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, CD4+ cell count, hematology, chemistry, urinalysis, and pregnancy testing (for women of reproductive potential). Population-based protease (PR), reverse transcriptase (RT) and integrase genotyping were done at the time of confirmed virologic failure. Plasma samples were stored for potential future studies to assess the impact of adherence, drug-resistant minority viral variants, and DTG exposure on virologic and CD4+ cell count responses to DTG plus 3TC. All participants also underwent UGT1A1 genotyping.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
122
Participants were prescribed 50 mg of DTG orally daily
Participants were prescribed 300 mg of 3TC orally daily.
University of Southern California CRS (1201)
Los Angeles, California, United States
UCLA CARE Center CRS (601)
Los Angeles, California, United States
Ucsd, Avrc Crs (701)
San Diego, California, United States
Harbor-UCLA Med. Ctr. CRS (603)
Torrance, California, United States
University of Colorado Hospital CRS (6101)
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Virologic Status at Week 24
Numbers of Participants With Virologic Success, Virologic Non-Success, and no Virologic Data at Week 24 Window are provided below. Virologic success is defined as HIV-1 RNA \<50 copies/mL and on study treatment (FDA Snapshot definition).
Time frame: At 24 weeks after study entry
Virologic Status at Week 12
Numbers of Participants With Virologic Success, Virologic Non-Success, and no Virologic Data at Week 12 Window are provided below. Virologic success is defined as HIV-1 RNA \<50 copies/mL and on study treatment (FDA Snapshot definition).
Time frame: At 12 weeks after study entry
Virologic Status at Week 48
Numbers of Participants With Virologic Success, Virologic Non-Success, and no Virologic Data at Week 48 Window are provided below. Virologic success is defined as HIV-1 RNA \<50 copies/mL and on study treatment (FDA Snapshot definition).
Time frame: At 48 weeks after study entry
Virologic Failure
Virologic failure is defined as follows: * Weeks 16 or 20: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \> 400 copies/mL * Week 24 or later: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \> 200 copies/mL 1. Participants were evaluated for virologic failure regardless of whether on study treatment. 2. Confirmation was determined based on any two consecutive evaluations meeting the virologic failure definition regardless of the time between them. 3. Participants discontinuing the study (for any reason, including death and lost to follow-up) were considered virologic failures if their last measurement met the definition of virologic failure but no confirmatory measurement was obtained. All other participants' follow-up was censored immediately after the last available plasma HIV-1 RNA measurement.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL - Missing = Failure
Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL by week, ITT (Intention To Treat; missing/off study/off treatment = failure) population.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 200 Copies/mL - Missing = Failure
Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 200 copies/mL by week, ITT (missing/off study/off treatment = failure) population.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/mL - Missing = Ignored
Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL by week, ITT (missing = ignored) population.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <200 Copies/mL- ITT Missing = Ignored
Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 200 copies/mL by week, ITT (missing = ignored) population.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/mL- As Treated
Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL by week, as treated population.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <200 Copies/mL- As Treated
Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 200 copies/mL by week, as treated population.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40 and 48
CD4+ Cell Count
CD4+ cell counts by study week.
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48
Change in CD4+ Cell Count
Change in CD4+ cell counts by study week. Change was calculated as value at the later visit minus the value at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48
Number of HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutation Occurrences in Participants
Number of HIV-1 drug resistance mutation occurrences participants with virologic failure and FDA snapshot non-successes. Participants that had one drug class resistance mutation may have one or more mutations.
Time frame: at the time of virologic failure
Fasting Lipids and Glucose
Fasting lipids include: total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and glucose. Fasting was set to be 8 hours prior to the sample collection.
Time frame: Baseline and week 48
Creatinine Clearance
Creatinine clearance was estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation.
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 4, 12, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Number of Participants With Grade 3 of Higher Adverse Events
Number of participants who experienced an AE (sign/symptom or laboratory abnormality) of Grade 3 or higher. The AEs were graded by the clinicians according to the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table (see reference in the Protocol Section) as follows: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Potentially Life-Threatening.
Time frame: from study treatment dispensation through up to week 52 or until study discontinuation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Univ. of Miami AIDS CRS (901)
Miami, Florida, United States
The Ponce de Leon Center CRS (5802)
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern University CRS (2701)
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Rush Univ. Med. Ctr. ACTG CRS (2702)
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital ACTG CRS (101)
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
...and 16 more locations