This is a two part study. The purpose of Part A is to determine if BMS-986020 is effective in treatment of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis using one dose of BMS-986020. The purpose of Part B is to determine if BMS-986020 is effective in treatment of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis using two different doses of BMS-986020.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Local Institution
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Part A - Change in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS)
Time frame: Week 24
Part B - Change in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS)
Time frame: Week 48
Part A: Change in physical function based on health assessment questionnaire-disability index from baseline at specified timepoints (HAQ-DI)
Time frame: Week 4, 12 and 24
Part A: Change in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) from baseline at specified time points
Time frame: Week 4, 12 and 24
Part A: Proportion of subjects with ≥ 20%, 40%, or 60% change in mRSS from baseline at specified time points
Time frame: Week 4, 12 and 24
Part A: Change in subject's global assessment on a visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline at specified time points
Time frame: Week 4, 12 and 24
Part A: Change in physician's global assessment on a visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline at specified time points
Time frame: Week 4, 12 and 24
Part A: Safety as measured by the frequency of deaths, SAEs, drug related AEs, AEs leading to discontinuation as well as marked abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests, vital sign measurements, ECGs, physical examinations
Serious adverse event (SAE), Adverse event (AE)
Time frame: up to Month 3 of the Follow-Up
Part A: Tolerability as measured by the frequency of deaths, SAEs, drug related AEs, AEs leading to discontinuation as well as marked abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests, vital sign measurements, ECGs, physical examinations
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Local Institution
Los Angeles, California, United States
Local Institution
Stanford, California, United States
Local Institution
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Local Institution
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Local Institution
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Local Institution
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Local Institution
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Local Institution
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Local Institution
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
...and 17 more locations
Time frame: up to Month 3 of the Follow-Up
Part B: Change in physical function based on health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI)
Time frame: Week 48
Part B: Change in percent predicted forced vital capacity
Time frame: Week 48
Part B:Proportion of subjects with ≥ 20%, 40%, or 60% change in mRSS from baseline at specified time points
Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48
Part B: Proportion of subjects with > 10% absolute decline in % FVC
Time frame: Week 48
Part B:Proportion of subjects with % FVC change > 0
Time frame: Week 48
Part B: Change in quantitative lung fibrosis (QLF) score on High resolution CT (HRCT) from baseline at specified time points
Time frame: Week 48
Part B: Change in subject's global assessment on a visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline at specified time points
Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48
Part B: Change in physician's global assessment on a visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline at specified time points
Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48
Part B: Change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 score from baseline at specified time points
Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48
Part B: Safety as measured by the frequency of deaths, SAEs, drug related AEs, AEs leading to discontinuation as well as marked abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests, vital sign measurements, ECGs, physical examinations
Time frame: up to Month 3 of the Follow-Up
Part B: Tolerability as measured by the frequency of deaths, SAEs, drug related AEs, AEs leading to discontinuation as well as marked abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests, vital sign measurements, ECGs, physical examinations
Time frame: up to Month 3 of the Follow-Up