This proposed pilot study will test methods and feasibility for a large pragmatic clinical trial comparing two inexpensive, first-line drugs for treating high blood pressure to determine if one is superior in preventing serious cardiovascular events and death. It will develop and test novel approaches to conducting trials that will be faster, less expensive, and more realistic by being embedded in a typical practice setting and using advanced health information technology.
For several decades, U.S. hypertension treatment guidelines have recommended a low-dose diuretic such as hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or chlorthalidone (CTD) as initial monotherapy in a stepped-care approach or as part of an initial two-drug combination. In numerous large clinical trials, CTD-based regimens have significantly reduced rates of cardiovascular events such as stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality compared with placebo, usual care, or active comparators. In contrast, few outcome studies have compared HCTZ-based regimens with other treatments, and they have generally found HCTZ to be less effective than non-thiazide comparators in preventing cardiovascular events. The two drugs have never been compared directly in a large trial. Despite the empirical evidence favoring CTD, HCTZ is much more widely used in clinical practice. The proposed R34 is a pilot study conducted in two large integrated health systems to test methods and feasibility for an eventual pragmatic randomized trial comparing the effectiveness of HCTZ and CTD for preventing cardiovascular events and mortality. Using a cluster-randomized design, investigators will allocate 40 primary care physicians and their adult hypertensive patients who currently use HCTZ (N=2,000) to either convert HCTZ users to CTD (intervention group) or to continue HCTZ (usual care group). The pilot study and planned full-scale trial will use existing health care infrastructure and electronic health records to identify eligible study subjects, distribute study medication, and collect operational and outcomes data. For this pilot study, Aim 1 will document that the intervention is delivered as intended. Aim 2 will compare safety in intervention and usual care patients. Aim 3 will refine the pilot study design and identify critical factors for intervention success using a mixed-methods approach. Aim 4 will refine estimates of sample size. Finally, Aim 5 will determine the costs of ascertaining outcomes and estimate per-participant costs for the full-scale trial. The pilot study will produce data that are necessary and sufficient to inform the planning of a full-scale trial comparing CTD and CTZ and will advance the development of methods for pragmatic trials.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
2,027
The intervention is simply a prescription conversion and the main outcome is whether or not patients accept the conversion and treatment with chlorthalidone.
HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research
Bloomington, Minnesota, United States
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research
Portland, Oregon, United States
Conversion to chlorthalidone, number of patients with primary fills
We will observe pharmacy claims to assess whether intervention patients filled their first prescription for chlorthalidone (primary adherence)
Time frame: 3 months
Conversion to chlorthalidone, number of participants with secondary fills
We will observe pharmacy claims to assess whether intervention patients who filled their first chlorthalidone prescription also filled their subsequent prescription (secondary adherence)
Time frame: 9 months
Blood pressure
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure measures, as documented in electronic health record
Time frame: 9 months
Hypertension drugs
Use of anti-hypertensive drugs in addition to hydrochlorothiazide or chlorthalidone, as documented in pharmaceutical claims
Time frame: 9 months
Electrolyte levels
Sodium and potassium levels, as documented in electronic health record
Time frame: 9 months
Renal function
Kidney function lab values (including epidermal growth factor receptor (eGFR) and creatinine), as documented in electronic health record
Time frame: 9 months
Safety outcomes
Hypotension with fainting (over-treatment), hypertensive crisis (under-treatment) and other clinical outcomes related to safety of hypertension treatment
Time frame: 9 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.