Evaluate efficacy, safety and tolerability of tofacitinib in pediatric JIA patients.
This is a randomized withdrawal, double blind, placebo controlled study of pediatric subjects (2 to \<18 years of age) with JIA. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of tofacitinib versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of JIA at Week 26 of the double blind phase as measured by the percentage of subjects with disease flare (according to PRCSG/PRINTO Disease Flare criteria) after Week 18 of the open label run in phase.All eligible subjects enrolled in the study will initially receive open label tofacitinib for 18 weeks (run in phase). At the end of the 18 week run in phase, only subjects who achieve at least a JIA ACR 30 response will be randomized to the 26 week double blind, placebo controlled phase. Subjects who do not achieve a JIA ACR 30 response at this time point will be discontinued from the study. In addition, subjects who experience a single episode of disease flare at any time during the study (including the open label run in and double blind phase) will also be discontinued from the study. All subjects participating in this study, including those discontinued from the study, will have the option, if eligible (based on inclusion and exclusion criteria), of enrolling in the tofacitinib JIA long term extension study (A3921145). Subjects who are eligible for the 26 week double blind phase will be randomized (1:1 ratio) to either active tofacitinib or placebo. For subjects with polyarticular course JIA (ie, extended oligoarthritis, polyarthritis RF+, polyarthritis RF , systemic JIA with active arthritis but without active systemic features), randomization will be stratified by JIA category and baseline CRP (normal, above normal). For subjects with psoriatic and enthesitis related arthritis, randomization will be stratified by JIA category. Approximately 210 subjects will be enrolled in the open label run in phase. Among subjects with polyarticular course JIA, stratification will target at least 50% with a baseline CRP above the upper limit of normal. The first cohort (ie, polyarticular course JIA) will have at least 170 subjects enrolled in the run in phase with the minimum number of JIA categories as follows: 24 with extended oligoarthritis, 20 with polyarthritis RF+, 62 with polyarthritis RF-, and no minimum for subjects with systemic JIA with active arthritis but without active systemic features. Additional cohorts (ie, psoriatic and enthesitis related arthritis) will include a minimum of 20 subjects with psoriatic arthritis, and 20 subjects with enthesitis related arthritis. The overall target minimum number of subjects to be enrolled in the study by age is as follows: 20 subjects 2 to \<6 years, 20 subjects 6 to \<12 years, and 20 subjects 12 to \<18 years. The duration of subject participation among those who complete the study (without discontinuation) is expected to be approximately 44 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
225
During the open label run in phase, all subjects will receive active tofacitinib oral tablets or oral solution twice daily (BID) orally, at a dosage based on the subject's body weight as specified below. During the double blind, placebo controlled phase, subjects will receive either active tofacitinib oral tablets/oral solution or matching placebo oral tablets/oral solution, twice daily (BID), at a dosage specified below. Body Weight (Dosage in tablet \[BID\] or solution \[BID\]): 5\<7kg (2mg or 2mL); 7\<10kg(2.5mg or 2. mL); 10 \<15kg (3mg or 3mL); 15\<25kg (3.5mg or 3.5mL); 25\<40kg (4mg or 4mL); 40kg (5 mg or 5 ml). Oral solution (1 mg/mL) is used for subjects \<40 kg. Oral tablets (5 mg) are used for subjects \>=40 kg.
matching placebo tablet or solution for tofacitinib
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Disease Flare According to Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group/Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRCSG/PRINTO) Disease Flare Criteria at Week 44
According to PRCSG/PRINTO, disease flare defined as worsening of \>=30 percent(%) in \>=3 of 6 variables of JIA core set, with no more than 1 variable improving by \>=30%. Six core variables: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (joint with swelling/in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by pain/tenderness), 2)Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a Visual Analog Scale\[VAS\] of 0\[no activity\] to 10\[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on VAS of 0\[very well\] to 10\[very poor\], 5) Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (CHAQ-DI): 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score,which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction);6) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate(ESR).
Time frame: Week 44
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 44
JIA ACR50 response defined as: \>=50% improvement in 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 out of 6 JIA core set variables worsened by \>=30%. Six core variables: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction); 6) ESR.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Arkansas Children's Hospital - Attention: Jill Hernandez
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Loma Linda University Children's Hospital
Loma Linda, California, United States
Loma Linda University Clinical Trial Center
Loma Linda, California, United States
Loma Linda University Eye Institute
Loma Linda, California, United States
Loma Linda University General Pediatric Clinic - Meridian
Loma Linda, California, United States
Pediatric Specialty Team Centers of LLU Children's Hospital
Loma Linda, California, United States
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
Pediatric Specialty Team Centers of LU Children's Hospital
San Bernardino, California, United States
Rady Children's Hospital - San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
...and 93 more locations
Time frame: Week 44
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 30 Response at Week 44
JIA ACR30 response defined as: \>=30% improvement in 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 out of 6 JIA core set variables worsened by \>=30%. Six core variables: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction); 6) ESR.
Time frame: Week 44
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 Response at Week 44
JIA ACR70 response defined as: \>=70% improvement in 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 out of 6 JIA core set variables worsened by \>=30%. Six core variables: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction); 6) ESR.
Time frame: Week 44
Double Blind Phase: JIA ACR Core Variable- Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 44
CHAQ is a valid assessment of functional disability, discomfort in participants with rheumatic diseases. It comprises of three indices: Disability and Discomfort, and global assessment of arthritis (overall well-being). CHAQ-DI: as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities-distributed, among a total of 30 items. Each question was rated on a 4-point scale of difficulty in performance ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). To calculate the overall score, the participant must have a domain score in at least 6 of the 8 domains. Scores of 8 domains were averaged to calculate the CHAQ-DI total score which ranges from 0 (no or minimal physical dysfunction) to 3 (very severe physical dysfunction), higher score indicates more disability. Change from double-blind baseline at Week 44 in DI total score is reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 44
Open-Label Phase: Percentage of Participants With Disease Flare According to Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group/Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRCSG/PRINTO) Disease Flare Criteria at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
According to PRCSG/PRINTO, disease flare defined as worsening of \>=30% in \>=3 of 6 variables of JIA core set, with no more than 1 variable improving by \>=30%. Six core variables were: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (joint with swelling or in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by pain/ tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction);6) ESR.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Disease Flare According to PRCSG/PRINTO Disease Flare Criteria at Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40
According to PRCSG/PRINTO, disease flare defined as worsening of \>=30% in \>=3 of 6 variables of JIA core set, with no more than 1 variable improving by \>=30%. Six core variables were: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (joint with swelling or in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by pain/ tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction); 6) ESR.
Time frame: Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40
Open-Label Phase: Time to Disease Flare
Time to disease flare:time (in days) from first dose of study drug until the day of disease flare in open-label phase. According to PRCSG/PRINTO, disease flare: worsening of \>=30% in \>=3 of 6 variables of JIA core set, with no more than 1 variable improving by \>=30%. 6 core variables were: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (joint with swelling or in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by pain/ tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction);6) ESR.
Time frame: Day 1 up to week 18
Double Blind Phase: Time to Disease Flare
Time to disease flare: time (in days) from first dose of study drug until the day of disease flare in double blind phase. According to PRCSG/PRINTO, disease flare: worsening of \>=30% in \>=3 of 6 variables of JIA core set, with no more than 1 variable improving by \>=30%. 6 core variables were: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (joint with swelling or in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by pain/ tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction);6) ESR.
Time frame: Day 1 of Week 19 up to week 44
Open-Label Phase: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 30 Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
JIA ACR30 response defined as: \>=30% improvement in 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 out of 6 JIA core set variables worsened by \>=30%. Six core variables: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction); 6) ESR.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 30 Response at Double Blind Baseline, Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40
JIA ACR30 response defined as: \>=30% improvement in 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 out of 6 JIA core set variables worsened by \>=30%. Six core variables: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction); 6) ESR.
Time frame: Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40
Open-Label Phase: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
JIA ACR50 response defined as: \>=50% improvement in 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 out of 6 JIA core set variables worsened by \>=30%. Six core variables: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction);6) ESR.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Double Blind Baseline, Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40
JIA ACR50 response defined as: \>=50% improvement in 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 out of 6 JIA core set variables worsened by \>=30%. Six core variables: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction); 6) ESR.
Time frame: Double blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40
Open-Label Phase: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
JIA ACR70 response defined as: \>=70% improvement in 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 out of 6 JIA core set variables worsened by \>=30%. Six core variables: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction);6) ESR.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 Response at Double Blind Baseline (Week 18),Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40
JIA ACR70 response defined as: \>=70% improvement in 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 out of 6 JIA core set variables worsened by \>=30%. Six core variables: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction); 6) ESR.
Time frame: Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40
Open-Label Phase: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 90 Response at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
JIA ACR90 response defined as: \>=90% improvement in 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 out of 6 JIA core set variables worsened by \>=30%. Six core variables: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction); 6) ESR.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 90 Response at Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
JIA ACR90 response defined as: \>=90% improvement in 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 out of 6 JIA core set variables worsened by \>=30%. Six core variables: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction);6) ESR.
Time frame: Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open-Label Phase: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 100 Response at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
JIA ACR100 response defined as: \>=100% improvement in 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 out of 6 JIA core set variables worsened by \>=30%. Six core variables: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction);6) ESR.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 100 Response at Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
JIA ACR100 response defined as: \>=100% improvement in 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 out of 6 JIA core set variables worsened by \>=30%. Six core variables: 1) Number of joints with active arthritis (defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 2) Number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) Physician global evaluation of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 4) Parent/legal guardian/participant global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\], 5) CHAQ-DI: 30 questions in 8 domains, each question answered on scale of 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; scores of each domain were averaged to derive total CHAQ-DI score, which ranges from 0 (minimum dysfunction) to 3 (most severe dysfunction);6) ESR.
Time frame: Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open Label Phase: Change From Baseline in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 27 (JADAS-27) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 CRP score was derived from four components; 1) Physician global assessment of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 2) Parent/legal guardian/subject global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\]), 3) Number of joints with active disease(defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 4) CRP (measured in milligram per liter \[mg/L\] and value normalized to 0 to 10 scale). The overall JADAS-27 score ranges from 0-57. A higher score indicates more disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS) 27 C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Score at Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 CRP score was derived from four components; 1) Physician global assessment of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 2) Parent/legal guardian/subject global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\]), 3) Number of joints with active disease(defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 4) CRP (measured in mg/L and value normalized to 0 to 10 scale). The overall JADAS-27 score ranges from 0-57. A higher score indicates more disease activity.
Time frame: Double blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open Label Phase: Change From Baseline in JADAS-27 Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 ESR score was derived from four components; 1) Physician global assessment of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 2) Parent/legal guardian/subject global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\]), 3) Number of joints with active disease (maximum of 27 and defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 4) ESR. The overall JADAS-27 score ranges from 0-57. A higher score indicates more disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Change From Double-Blind Baseline in JADAS-27 Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) Score at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 ESR score was derived from four components; 1) Physician global assessment of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 2) Parent/legal guardian/subject global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\]), 3) Number of joints with active disease (maximum of 27 and defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 4) ESR. The overall JADAS-27 score ranges from 0-57. A higher score indicates more disease activity.
Time frame: Double blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open-Label Phase: Percentage of Participants With JADAS-27 CRP Minimum Disease Activity at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Minimum Disease Activity is defined by a JADAS-27 CRP score less than or equal to 3.8 for participants with polyarthritis, and less than or equal to 2 for participants with oligoarthritis. JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 CRP score was derived from four components; 1) Physician global assessment of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 2) Parent/legal guardian/subject global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\]), 3) Number of joints with active disease(maximum of 27 defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 4) CRP (measured in milligram per liter \[mg/L\] and value normalized to 0 to 10 scale). The overall JADAS-27 score ranges from 0-57. A higher score indicates more disease activity.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With JADAS-27 CRP Minimum Disease Activity at Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Minimum Disease Activity is defined by a JADAS-27 CRP score less than or equal to 3.8 for participants with polyarthritis, and less than or equal to 2 for participants with oligoarthritis. JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 CRP score was derived from four components; 1) Physician global assessment of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 2) Parent/legal guardian/subject global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\]), 3) Number of joints with active disease (maximum of 27 and defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 4) CRP (measured in milligram per liter \[mg/L\] and value normalized to 0 to 10 scale). The overall JADAS-27 score ranges from 0-57. A higher score indicates more disease activity.
Time frame: Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open-Label Phase: Percentage of Participants With JADAS-27 CRP Inactive Disease Activity at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
JADAS-27 inactive disease is defined by a JADAS score less than or equal to 1. JADAS-27 Inactive Disease cutoff values are defined as: 1) Polyarthritis: Inactive Disease: \<=1 and 2) Oligoarthritis (\<4 active joints): Inactive Disease: \<=1. JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 CRP score was derived from four components; 1) Physician global assessment of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 2) Parent/legal guardian/subject global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\]), 3) Number of joints with active disease (maximum of 27 and defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 4) CRP (measured in milligram per liter \[mg/L\] and value normalized to 0 to 10 scale). The overall JADAS-27 score ranges from 0-57. A higher score indicates more disease activity.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With JADAS-27 CRP Inactive Disease Activity at Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
JADAS-27 inactive disease is defined by a JADAS score less than or equal to 1. JADAS-27 Inactive Disease cutoff values are defined as: 1) Polyarthritis: Inactive Disease: \<=1 and 2) Oligoarthritis (\<4 active joints): Inactive Disease: \<=1. JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 CRP score was derived from four components; 1) Physician global assessment of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]), 2) Parent/legal guardian/subject global assessment of overall well-being (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[very well\] to 10 \[very poor\]), 3) Number of joints with active disease (maximum of 27 and defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness), 4) CRP (measured in milligram per liter \[mg/L\] and value normalized to 0 to 10 scale). The overall JADAS-27 score ranges from 0-57. A higher score indicates more disease activity.
Time frame: Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR Inactive Disease at Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
JIA ACR Inactive Disease criteria included: No joints with active arthritis, No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to sJIA, No active uveitis (as defined by the Standardized Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group), Normal ESR (within normal limits of the method used where tested) or, if elevated, not attributable to JIA, Physician global assessment of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]) score of 'best possible' (score of "0") on the scale used, morning stiffness of \<=15 minutes.
Time frame: Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Presence of JIA ACR Clinical Remission
JIA ACR Clinical Remission Criteria included: Clinical inactive disease for 6 months continuously while on medications for JIA. Clinical Inactive Disease criteria included: No joints with active arthritis, No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to sJIA, No active uveitis (as defined by the SUN Working Group), Normal ESR (within normal limits of the method used where tested) or, if elevated, not attributable to JIA, Physician global assessment of disease activity (assessed on a VAS of 0 \[no activity\] to 10 \[maximum activity\]) score of 'best possible' (score of "0") on the scale used, morning stiffness of less than or equal to (\<=) 15 minutes.
Time frame: From Week 18 in double blind phase up to Week 44
Open Label Phase: JIA ACR Core Variable- Change From Baseline in Number of Joints With Active Arthritis at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Number of joints with active arthritis defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness. The score range of the number of joints is from 0-71.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: JIA ACR Core Variable- Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Number of Joints With Active Arthritis at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Number of joints with active arthritis defined as joint with swelling or, in absence of swelling, limited range of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness. Number of joints ranged from 0 to 71.
Time frame: Double blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open Label Phase: JIA ACR Core Variable- Change From Baseline in Number of Joints With Limited Range of Motion at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
The maximum number of joints with limitation of movement was 67 and these were defined as those in the joint assessment with 'limitation of motion'.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: JIA ACR Core Variable- Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Number of Joints With Limited Range of Motion at Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
The maximum number of joints with limitation of movement was 67 and these were defined as those in the joint assessment with 'limitation of motion'.
Time frame: Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open Label Phase: JIA ACR Core Variable- Change From Baseline in Physician Global Evaluation of Disease Activity at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Physician global evaluation of disease activity was measured on a 21-numbered circle VAS ranges from 0 to 10 (in 0.5 increments), with '0' as 'No Activity' and '10' as 'Maximum Activity', higher score indicated more disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: JIA ACR Core Variable- Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Physician Global Evaluation of Disease Activity at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Physician global evaluation of disease activity was measured on a 21-numbered circle VAS ranges from 0 to 10 (in 0.5 increments), with '0' as 'No Activity' and '10' as 'Maximum Activity', higher score indicated more disease activity.
Time frame: Double blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open Label Phase: JIA ACR Core Variable- Change From Baseline in Parent/Legal Guardian/Participant Global Evaluation of Overall Well-Being at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
The parent/or legal guardian/participant rated the overall well-being on a 21-numbered circle VAS ranges from 0 to 10 (in 0.5 increments), with '0' as 'Very Well' and '10' as 'Very Poorly', higher scores=more disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: JIA ACR Core Variable- Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Parent/Legal Guardian/Participant Global Evaluation of Overall Well-Being at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
The parent/or legal guardian/participant rated the overall well-being on a 21-numbered circle VAS ranges from 0 to 10 (in 0.5 increments), with '0' as 'Very Well' and '10' as 'Very Poorly', higher scores=more disease activity.
Time frame: Double blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open Label Phase: JIA ACR Core Variable- Change From Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) Total Scores at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
CHAQ is a valid assessment of functional disability, discomfort in participants with rheumatic diseases. It comprises of three indices: Disability and Discomfort, and global assessment of arthritis (overall well-being). CHAQ-DI: as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities-distributed, among a total of 30 items. Each question was rated on a 4-point scale of difficulty in performance ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). To calculate the overall score, the participant must have a domain score in at least 6 of the 8 domains. Scores of 8 domains were averaged to calculate the CHAQ-DI total score which ranges from 0 (no or minimal physical dysfunction) to 3 (very severe physical dysfunction), higher score indicates more disability. Change from baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18 in DI total score is reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: JIA ACR Core Variable- Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) Total Scores at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40
CHAQ: valid assessment of functional disability, discomfort in participants with rheumatic diseases. It comprises of three indices: Disability and Discomfort, and global assessment of arthritis (overall well-being). CHAQ-DI: as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities-distributed, among a total of 30 items. Each question was rated on a 4-point scale of difficulty in performance ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). To calculate overall score, participant must have a domain score in at least 6 of the 8 domains. Scores of 8 domains were averaged to calculate the CHAQ-DI total score which ranges from 0 (no or minimal physical dysfunction) to 3 (very severe physical dysfunction), higher score indicates more disability. Change from double-blind baseline at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40 in DI total score is reported.
Time frame: Double blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40
Open-Label Phase: Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) Responses at Week 4 and Week 18
CHQ: 50-item, 14 subscale (Global health, physical functioning, social limitations: emotional, social limitations: physical, bodily pain, behavior, global behavior, mental health, self-esteem, general health, Change in health, emotional impact on parent, time impact on parent, family activities, family cohesion) parent or legal guardian assessed instrument of child's physical, emotional, social well-being, and relative burden of disease on the parents. Each subscale rated on Likert-type scale: range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate a more positive health status. Two summary scores: Physical Health and Psychosocial Health were weighted composites derived from subscale items using scoring algorithms (transformed scores); range 0 to 100: higher scores indicate more positive health status.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 18
Double Blind Phase: Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) Responses at Week 44
CHQ: 50-item, 14 subscale (Global health, physical functioning, social limitations: emotional, social limitations: physical, bodily pain, behavior, global behavior, mental health, self-esteem, general health, Change in health, emotional impact on parent, time impact on parent, family activities, family cohesion) parent or legal guardian assessed instrument of child's physical, emotional, social well-being, and relative burden of disease on the parents. Each subscale rated on Likert-type scale: range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate a more positive health status. Two summary scores: Physical Health and Psychosocial Health were weighted composites derived from subscale items using scoring algorithms (transformed scores); range 0 to 100: higher scores indicate more positive health status.
Time frame: Double-Blind Baseline (Week 18), Week 44
Open Label Phase: Change From Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ)- Discomfort Index at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
CHAQ is a validated instrument and comprises of two indices, Disability and Discomfort, and global assessment of arthritis (overall well-being). Discomfort Index included: assessment of discomfort, the parent/legal guardian/participant were asked to provide a response to the question: How much pain do you think your child had because of his or her illness in the past week?, The parent/legal guardian/ participant rated the overall pain on a 0 to 10 VAS, where '0' indicates 'No Pain' and '10' indicates 'Very Severe Pain', higher scores indicates more severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase:Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ)- Discomfort Index at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
CHAQ is a validated instrument and comprises of two indices, Disability and Discomfort, and global assessment of arthritis (overall well-being). Discomfort Index included: assessment of discomfort, the parent/legal guardian/participant were asked to provide a response to the question: How much pain do you think your child had because of his or her illness in the past week?, The parent/legal guardian/ participant rated the overall pain on a 0 to 10 VAS, where '0' indicates 'No Pain' and '10' indicates 'Very Severe Pain', higher scores indicates more severity.
Time frame: Double blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36,40 and 44
Open-Label Phase: Percentage of Participants With Active Uveitis at Baseline
Uveitis is the inflammation of the uvea. Participants were assessed for presence of uveitis (according to Standard Uveitis Nomenclature \[SUN\]). If Uveitis was present in participant at Baseline, it was considered as "active uveitis"; If Uveitis was not present in participant at Baseline, it was considered as "Inactive uveitis". As per SUN, Uveitis is defined as: anterior (in which anterior chamber is primary site of inflammation); intermediate (primary site of inflammation: vitreous); posterior (primary site of inflammation: retina or choroid). Percentage of participants with active uveitis (of any type) are reported.
Time frame: Baseline
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Active Uveitis at Week 24 and Week 44
Uveitis is the inflammation of the uvea. Participants were assessed for presence of uveitis (according to Standard Uveitis Nomenclature \[SUN\]). If Uveitis was present in participant at Baseline, it was considered as "active uveitis"; If Uveitis was not present in participant at Baseline, it was considered as "Inactive uveitis". As per SUN, Uveitis is defined as: anterior (in which anterior chamber is primary site of inflammation); intermediate (primary site of inflammation: vitreous); posterior (primary site of inflammation: retina or choroid). Percentage of participants with active uveitis (of any type) are reported.
Time frame: Week 24 and Week 44
Open-Label Phase: Change From Baseline in the Tender Entheseal Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Participants with enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) undergo Tender entheseal assessment. Tender entheseal assessment: Entheses were assessed and coded as: 1= any tenderness, 0= no tenderness, NE= not evaluable. Total number of tender entheses: 66\*(total number of tender entheses with counts \> 0)/number of non-missing tender entheses. If \> 33 tender entheseal counts were missing, total number of tender entheses was defined as missing.
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Change From Double-Blind Baseline in the Tender Entheseal Assessment at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Participants with ERA undergo Tender entheseal assessment. Tender entheseal assessment: Entheses were assessed and coded as: 1= any tenderness, 0= no tenderness, NE= not evaluable. Total number of tender entheses: 66\*(total number of tender entheses with counts \> 0)/number of non-missing tender entheses. If \> 33 tender entheseal counts were missing, total number of tender entheses was defined as missing.
Time frame: Double blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open-Label Phase: Change From Baseline in the Modified Schober's Test at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Participants with ERA undergo Modified Schober's Test. In the Modified Schober's Test, a mark was placed 5 cm below the midpoint of a line that joined the posterior superior iliac spines. Another mark was placed 10 cm above the first. The participant then bent maximally forward with the knees fully extended. The distance between the two marks was then re-measured. The full measurement between the two lines was recorded to the nearest tenth of a centimeter and is reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Change From Double Blind Baseline in the Modified Schober's Test at Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Participants with ERA undergo Modified Schober's Test. In the Modified Schober's Test, a mark was placed 5 cm below the midpoint of a line that joined the posterior superior iliac spines. Another mark was placed 10 cm above the first. The participant then bent maximally forward with the knees fully extended. The distance between the two marks was then re-measured. The full measurement between the two lines was recorded to the nearest tenth of a centimeter and is reported.
Time frame: Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open-Label Phase: Change From Baseline in the Overall Back Pain and Nocturnal Back Pain Responses at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Participants with ERA undergo Overall Back Pain and Nocturnal Back Pain assessment. For Overall Back Pain, parent/legal guardian/participant were asked to provide a response to the question: What is the amount of back pain at any time that your child experienced in the past week? And For Nocturnal Back Pain: What is the amount of back pain at night that your child experienced in the past week?. Response to these questions was provided by parent/legal guardian/participant using a VAS of 0-10, where 0= No Pain and 10= Most Severe Pain, higher score indicated more severe pain.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Change From Double-Blind Baseline in the Overall Back Pain and Nocturnal Back Pain Responses at Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Participants with ERA undergo Overall Back Pain and Nocturnal Back Pain assessment. For Overall Back Pain, parent/legal guardian/participant were asked to provide a response to the question: What is the amount of back pain at any time that your child experienced in the past week? And For Nocturnal Back Pain: What is the amount of back pain at night that your child experienced in the past week?. Response to these questions was provided by parent/legal guardian/participant using a VAS of 0-10, where 0= No Pain and 10= Most Severe Pain, higher score indicated more severe pain.
Time frame: Double blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open-Label Phase: Changes From Baseline in Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected With Psoriasis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Percentage of body surface area affected by psoriasis was estimated using the palm method. One of the participant's palm to proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and thumb =\\together represented 1% of total BSA. Regions of the body were assigned specific number of palms with percentage (Head and Neck = 10% \[10 palms\], Upper extremities = 20% \[20 palms\], Trunk \[axillae and groin\] = 30% \[30 palms\], Lower extremities \[buttocks\] = 40% \[40 palms\]). The number of palms of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis. The total BSA affected was the summation of individual regions affected.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Changes From Double Blind Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected With Psoriasis at Week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Percentage of body surface area affected by psoriasis was estimated using the palm method. One of the participant's palm to PIP and thumb together represented 1% of total BSA. Regions of the body were assigned specific number of palms with percentage (Head and Neck = 10% \[10 palms\], Upper extremities = 20% \[20 palms\], Trunk \[axillae and groin\] = 30% \[30 palms\], Lower extremities \[buttocks\] = 40% \[40 palms\]). The number of palms of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis. The total BSA affected was the summation of individual regions affected.
Time frame: Double Blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open-Label Phase: Changes From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Assessments at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
The PGA of psoriasis was scored on a 6-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling were scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 5 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and ranged as 0= no symptom to 5=severe, higher score indicates more severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase:Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Assessments at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
The PGA of psoriasis was scored on a 6-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling were scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 5 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and ranged as 0= no symptom to 5=severe, higher score indicates more severity.
Time frame: Double blind Baseline (Week 18), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open-Label Phase: Taste Assessment of Tofacitinib Oral Solution on Day 14
Oral solution was given only to participants weighing \<40 kg and to the participants who were unable to swallow tablets. Taste assessment was evaluated using a 5 categories questionnaire. Participants were asked to answer in one of the following categories to describe the taste of oral solution of tofacitinib: dislike very much, dislike a little, not sure, like a little and like very much. Number of participants within each category are reported.
Time frame: Day 14
Open-Label Phase: Number of Participants With Serious Infections, Cytopenia, Malignancies and Cardiovascular Diseases
Serious infection defined as any infection that requires hospitalization for treatment or requires parenteral antimicrobial therapy or meets other criteria that require it to be classified as a serious adverse event. Cytopenia was categorized as: lymphocyte counts: \<500 lymphocytes/ millimeter\^3 (mm), neutrophil counts \<1000 neutrophils/mm\^3, platelet counts \<100,000 platelets/mm\^3, any single hemoglobin value \<8 grams/decilitre (g/dL) and any single hemoglobin value drops \>=2 g/dL below baseline. Number of Participants With serious infections, cytopenia, malignancies and Cardiovascular Diseases are reported.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to Week 18
Double Blind Phase: Number of Participants With Serious Infections, Cytopenia, Malignancies and Cardiovascular Diseases
Serious infection defined as any infection that requires hospitalization for treatment or requires parenteral antimicrobial therapy or meets other criteria that require it to be classified as a serious adverse event. Cytopenia was categorized as: lymphocyte counts \<500 lymphocytes/mm\^3, neutrophil counts \<1000 neutrophils/mm\^3, platelet counts \<100000 platelets/mm\^3, any single hemoglobin (hg) value \<8 g/dL and any single hemoglobin value drops \>=2 g/dL below baseline. Number of Participants With serious infections, cytopenia, malignancies and Cardiovascular Diseases are reported.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug in double blind up to week 44
Open-Label Phase: Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation (Pubic Hair)
Tanner stage is a scale used to document the stage of development of puberty by assessing the secondary sexual characteristics: Pubic hair (both male and female), breast size (for females); and size of the genitalia (for males).were assessed in this study and with values in the scale ranging from: Stage 1: no hair, Stage 2: downy hair, Stage 3: Scant terminal hair, Stage 4: Terminal hair that fills the entire triangle overlying the pubic region and Stage 5: Terminal hair that extends beyond the inguinal crease onto the thigh. Tanner Stage for pubic hair at Day 1 was summarized and reported using number of participants in each stage.
Time frame: Day 1
Double Blind Phase: Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation (Pubic Hair)
Tanner stage is a scale used to document the stage of development of puberty by assessing the secondary sexual characteristics: Pubic hair (both male and female), breast size (for females); and size of the genitalia (for males) were assessed in this study and with values in the scale ranging from: Stage 1: no hair, Stage 2: downy hair, Stage 3: Scant terminal hair, Stage 4: Terminal hair that fills the entire triangle overlying the pubic region and Stage 5: Terminal hair that extends beyond the inguinal crease onto the thigh. Tanner Stage for pubic hair at Week 44 was summarized and reported using number of participants in each stage.
Time frame: Week 44
Open-Label Phase: Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation (Breast Exam)
Tanner stage is a scale used to document the stage of development of puberty by assessing the secondary sexual characteristics: Pubic hair (both male and female), breast size (for females); and size of the genitalia (for males).were assessed in this study and with values in the scale ranging from: Stage 1: No glandular breast tissue palpable, Stage 2: Breast bud palpable under areola (1st pubertal sign in females), Stage 3: Breast tissue palpable outside areola; no areolar development, Stage 4: Areola elevated above contour of the breast, forming "double scoop" appearance, Stage 5: Areolar mound recedes back into single breast contour with areolar hyperpigmentation, papillae development and nipple protrusion. Tanner Stage for Breast at Day 1 was summarized and reported using number of participants in each stage.
Time frame: Day 1
Double Blind Phase: Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation (Breast Exam)
Tanner stage is a scale used to document the stage of development of puberty by assessing the secondary sexual characteristics: Pubic hair (both male and female), breast size (for females); and size of the genitalia (for males).were assessed in this study and with values in the scale ranging from: Stage 1: No glandular breast tissue palpable, Stage 2: Breast bud palpable under areola (1st pubertal sign in females), Stage 3: Breast tissue palpable outside areola; no areolar development, Stage 4: Areola elevated above contour of the breast, forming "double scoop" appearance, Stage 5: Areolar mound recedes back into single breast contour with areolar hyperpigmentation, papillae development and nipple protrusion. Tanner Stage for Breast at Week 44 was summarized and reported using number of participants in each stage.
Time frame: Week 44
Open-Label Phase: Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation (Genitalia)
Tanner stage is a scale used to document the stage of development of puberty by assessing the secondary sexual characteristics: Pubic hair (both male and female), breast size (for females); and size of the genitalia (for males).were assessed in this study and with values in the scale ranging from: Stage 1: Testicular volume \< 4 ml or long axis \< 2.5 cm, Stage 2: 4 ml-8 ml (or 2.5-3.3 cm long), 1st pubertal sign in males, Stage 3: 9 ml-12 ml (or 3.4-4.0 cm long), Stage 4: 15-20 ml (or 4.1-4.5 cm long), Stage 5: \> 20 ml (or \> 4.5 cm long). Tanner Stage for genitalia at Day 1 was summarized and reported using number of participants in each stage.
Time frame: Day 1
Double Blind Phase: Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation (Genitalia)
Tanner stage is a scale used to document the stage of development of puberty by assessing the secondary sexual characteristics: Pubic hair (both male and female), breast size (for females); and size of the genitalia (for males).were assessed in this study and with values in the scale ranging from: Stage 1: Testicular volume \< 4 ml or long axis \< 2.5 cm, Stage 2: 4 ml-8 ml (or 2.5-3.3 cm long), 1st pubertal sign in males, Stage 3: 9 ml-12 ml (or 3.4-4.0 cm long), Stage 4: 15-20 ml (or 4.1-4.5 cm long), Stage 5: \> 20 ml (or \> 4.5 cm long). Tanner Stage for genitalia at Week 44 was summarized and reported using number of participants in each stage.
Time frame: Week 44
Open-Label Phase: Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
Criteria: Hemoglobin(Hg),hematocrit erythrocytes(Ery); \<0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN), Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume; \<0.9\*LLN, \>1.1\*upper limit of normal (ULN), Platelets; \<0.5\*LLN, \>1.75\*ULN, Leukocytes (leu); \<0.6\*LLN, \>1.5\*ULN, Lymphocytes (Ly), Ly/leu, Neutrophils, Neutrophils/leu \<0.8\*LLN, Basophils/leu, Eosinophils, Eosinophils/leu, Monocytes, Monocytes/leu \>1.2\*ULN, Ery Sedimentation Rate \>1.5\*ULN. Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, AST, ALT, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, Albumin \>1.2\*ULN, Creatinine \>1.3\*ULN, HDL Cholesterol (Chol)\<0.8\*LLN, LDL Chol, LDL Chol Friedewald Est PEG \>1.2\*ULN, Triglycerides \>1.3\*ULN, Calcium \<0.9\*LLN, Bicarbonate \<0.9\*LLN, Glucose \>1.5\*ULN, Creatine Kinase \>2.0\*ULN, C Reactive Protein \>1.1\*ULN, Chol \>1.3\*ULN. Urinalysis: Specific Gravity \>1.030, Glucose, Ketones, Protein, Hg, Nitrite, Leu Esterase \>=1, Ery, Leu \>=20, Hyaline Casts \>1.Only those category in which at least 1 participant had data is reported.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to Week 18
Double Blind Phase: Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
Criteria: Hg, hematocrit Ery; \<0.8\* LLN, Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume; \<0.9\*LLN, \>1.1\* ULN, Platelets; \<0.5\*LLN, \>1.75\*ULN, leu; \<0.6\*LLN, \>1.5\*ULN, Ly, Ly/leu, Neutrophils, Neutrophils/leu \<0.8\*LLN, Basophils/leu, Eosinophils, Eosinophils/leu, Monocytes, Monocytes/leu \>1.2\*ULN, Prothrombin Time \>1.1\*ULN, Ery Sedimentation Rate \>1.5\*ULN. Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, AST, ALT, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Alkaline Phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, Albumin \>1.2\*ULN, Creatinine \>1.3\*ULN, HDL Cholesterol (Chol)\<0.8\*LLN, LDL Chol, LDL Chol Friedewald Est PEG \>1.2\*ULN, Triglycerides \>1.3\*ULN, Calcium \<0.9\*LLN, Bicarbonate \<0.9\*LLN, Glucose \>1.5\*ULN, Creatine Kinase \>2.0\*ULN, C Reactive Protein \>1.1\*ULN, Chol \>1.3\*ULN. Urinalysis: Specific Gravity \>1.030, pH \>8, urine Glucose, Ketones, Protein, Hg, Nitrite, Leu Esterase \>=1, Ery, Leu \>=20, Hyaline Casts \>1.Only those category in which at least 1 participant had data is reported.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug in double blind up to Week 44
Open-Label Phase: Number of Participants With Physical Examination Abnormalities
Physical examination included: abdomen, ears, extremities, eyes, general appearance, head, heart, lungs, lymph nodes, neurological, nose, skin, and throat. Abnormality in physical examination was based on investigator's discretion.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18
Double Blind Phase: Number of Participants With Physical Examination Abnormalities
Physical examination included: abdomen, ears, extremities, eyes, general appearance, head, heart, lungs, lymph nodes, neurological, nose, skin, and throat. Abnormality in physical examination was based on investigator's discretion.
Time frame: Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Open-Label Phase: Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities
Vital Sign Abnormalities criteria included: sitting diastolic blood pressure millimeters of Mercury (mmHG) of \<50 mmHg, sitting pulse rate beats per minute (bpm) of \<40 or 120 bpm, sitting systolic blood pressure (mmHG) of \<90 mmHg, supine diastolic blood pressure (mmHG) of \<50 mmHg, supine pulse rate (BPM) of \<40 bpm or \>120 bpm, supine systolic blood pressure (mmHG) of 90 mmHg.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to Week 18
Double Blind Phase: Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities
Vital Sign Abnormalities criteria included: diastolic blood pressure (mmHG) of \<50 mmHg, Pulse rate (BPM) of \<40 bpm or \>120 bpm, sitting diastolic blood pressure (mmHG) of \<50 mmHg, sitting pulse rate beats per minute (bpm) of \<40 bpm or \>120 bpm, sitting systolic blood pressure (mmHG) of \<90 mmHg, supine diastolic blood pressure (mmHG) of \<50 mmHg, supine pulse rate (BPM) of \<40 bpm or \>120 bpm, supine systolic blood pressure (mmHG) of \<90 mmHg, systolic blood pressure (mmHG) of \<90 mmHg.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug in double blind up to week 44
Open-Label Phase: Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Measures
Change in vital Signs included: Sitting diastolic blood pressure \[mmHG\]: \>=20mmHg increase from baseline (IFB) and \>= 20mmHg decrease from baseline (DFB). Sitting systolic blood pressure mmHG: \>= 30mmHg IFB and \>= 30mmHg DFB. Supine diastolic blood pressure mmHG: \>= 20mmHg IFB and \>= 20mmHg DFB. Supine systolic blood pressure mmHG: \>= 30mmHg IFB and \>= 30mmHg DFB.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to Week 18
Double Blind Phase: Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Measures
Change in vital Signs included: Sitting diastolic blood pressure (mmHG): \>=20mmHg IFB and \>= 20mmHg DFB. Sitting systolic blood pressure mmHG: \>= 30mmHg IFB and \>= 30mmHg DFB. Supine diastolic blood pressure mmHG: \>= 20mmHg IFB and \>= 20mmHg DFB. Supine systolic blood pressure mmHG: \>= 30mmHg IFB and \>= 30mmHg DFB.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug in double blind up to week 44