NIV-NAVA vs NIV-PS/PC in Respiratory Insufficiency

Vejle Hospital30 enrolled

Overview

This study evaluates the difference between Non Invasive Ventilation with Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NIV-NAVA) and Conventional Non Invasive Ventilation with Pressure Support (PS) or Pressure Control (PC). All the patients are ventilated in each mode for 4 hours. Afterwards they will be subjected to a semi-structured interview where they will be asked to compare the two modes. The hypothesis is that NIV-NAVA will correct patients power of Hydrogen (pH), PaCO2 og PaO2 more quickly than NIV-PS and NIV-NAVA is more comfortable for the patients.

Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) is a ventilation mode where the diaphragm is controlling the amount of ventilatory assistance proportionally through a nasogastric tube containing electrodes which are sending the electrical activities of the diaphragm (Eadi) to the ventilator. Whereas Conventional ventilation modes like Pressure support or Pressure Control are dependent on the pressure drop or flow reversal to initiate assist delivered to the patient. This is last step of the signal chain leading to inhalation and is subject to disturbances such as intrinsic positive expiratory end pressure (PEEP), hyperinflation and leakage.

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

Conditions

Respiratory Insufficiency Acute Respiratory Insufficiency

Interventions

NIV-NAVAOTHER

Cross-over study where participants are randomized to start with either NIV-NAVA or NIV-PS/PC for 4 hours, followed by another 4 hours with the other arm.

NIV-PS/PCOTHER

Cross-over study where participants are randomized to start with either NIV-NAVA or NIV-PS/PC for 4 hours, followed by another 4 hours with the other arm.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients admitted at the ICU with acute respiratory insufficiency and therefore have hypoxia(PaO2 \< 7 kPa on atmospheric air) og pH \< 7.35 with non-compensated hypercapnia (PaCO2 \> 6.0 kPa). * Patients, which according to the departments guidelines are required to treatment with NIV Exclusion Criteria: * Patients under years of 18. * Patients without the possibility to give informed consent. * Patients with neuromuscular or neurological disease. * Patients with a verified or suspected head trauma. * Patients with a acknowledged hiatus hernia. * Patients with an active or suspected active upper GI bleeding. * Patients which have previously been in the study. * Patients with a suspected or verified acute coronary syndrome.

Locations (1)

Vejle Hospital

Vejle, Southern Jetland, Denmark

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time for normalizing of Power of Hydrogen (pH) in arterial blood gases. Normal pH frame 7.35-7.45.

Time frame: 8 hours

Time for normalizing of Partial pressure of Oxygen (pO2) in arterial blood gases. Normal frame for pO2 7-14,4 (or to the usual level for the patient).

Time frame: 8 hours

Time for normalizing Carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2) in arterial blood gases. Normal frames pCO2 4,7-6,4 (or to the usual level for the patient).

Time frame: 8 hours

Electrical activity of the diaphragm (Eadi). Reduction in respiratory work assessed by Eadi (in percentage).

Time frame: 8 hours

Secondary Outcomes

Patient comfort

There will be conducted a semi-interview on the subjects. They will be asked: If they felt any difference in breathing between the two modes. If yes, what was the difference? Which method did you prefer? And why? Do you have any comments?

Time frame: 24 hours

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.