This randomized phase II trial studies how well temozolomide and capecitabine work compared to standard treatment with cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide in treating patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract or pancreas that has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic) or cannot be removed by surgery. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, capecitabine, cisplatin, carboplatin and etoposide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Certain types of neuroendocrine carcinomas may respond better to treatments other than the current standard treatment of cisplatin and etoposide. It is not yet known whether temozolomide and capecitabine may work better than cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide in treating patients with this type of neuroendocrine carcinoma, called non-small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the progression free survival (PFS) of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide versus the PFS of temozolomide and capecitabine in patients with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the response rate (RR) of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide versus the RR of temozolomide and capecitabine in patients with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. II. To assess the overall survival (OS) of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide versus the OS of temozolomide and capecitabine in patients with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. III. To evaluate the toxicities associated with the combination of temozolomide and capecitabine and the combination of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide, respectively, in patients with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. TERTIARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the impact of each treatment regimen on PFS, RR and OS based on marker of proliferation Ki-67 index in patients with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. (Laboratory) II. To assess the prognostic significance of well differentiated versus poorly differentiated non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in relationship to survival and response to treatment. (Laboratory) III. To assess the agreement in Ki-67 status between that reported by institutional pathologist and that reported by central pathology review. (Laboratory) OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM A: Patients receive capecitabine orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days 1-14 and temozolomide PO once daily (QD) on days 10-14. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM B: Patients receive cisplatin intravenously (IV) on days 1-3 or carboplatin IV on day 1. Patients also receive etoposide IV on days 1-3. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 3 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
67
Given PO
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV
Correlative studies
Given PO
Kingman Regional Medical Center
Kingman, Arizona, United States
Cancer Center at Saint Joseph's
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Mercy Hospital Fort Smith
Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States
CHI Saint Vincent Cancer Center Hot Springs
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
Kaiser Permanente-Deer Valley Medical Center
Antioch, California, United States
PFS
Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used for time-to-event distribution. PFS by arm will be compared using one-sided stratified log-rank tests. Stratified Cox?s proportional hazards models will be used to estimate hazard ratios.
Time frame: Time from randomization to documented progression or death without progression, assessed up to 1 year
Incidence of toxicity, graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0
90% confidence intervals will be provided.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after last dose of protocol therapy
OS
Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used for time-to-event distribution. OS by arm will be compared using one-sided stratified log-rank tests. Stratified Cox?s proportional hazards models will be used to estimate hazard ratios.
Time frame: Time from randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Response rate (complete response or partial response) by RECIST 1.1
Analyzed using a Fisher?s exact test at a one-sided significance level of 0.10.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Mission Hope Medical Oncology - Arroyo Grande
Arroyo Grande, California, United States
PCR Oncology
Arroyo Grande, California, United States
Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital
Auburn, California, United States
Sutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Auburn
Auburn, California, United States
Alta Bates Summit Medical Center-Herrick Campus
Berkeley, California, United States
...and 663 more locations