The purpose of the PINPOINT study is to compare pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of ticagrelor in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients designated to invasive strategy. Data regarding comparison of PK and antiplatelet action of ticagrelor in STEMI and NSTEMI are sparse. Recommended dosing regimens of ticagrelor are identical for both STEMI and NSTEMI, although it is not known whether PK and PD features of ticagrelor are uniform in these patients.
The European Society of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines recommend use of ticagrelor or prasugrel as a treatment of choice in patients with both STEMI and NSTEMI (class of recommendation I, level of evidence B). Recommended dosing regimens of ticagrelor are identical in STEMI and NSTEMI patients, although epidemiology, clinical approach and early outcomes differ between these two types of myocardial infarction. It is not known whether PK and PD features of ticagrelor are uniform in STEMI and NSTEMI patients. However, the existing body of evidence suggest that PK and PD of ticagrelor may be attenuated in STEMI patients compared to healthy subjects and patients with stable coronary artery disease, which may expose STEMI patients at increased risk of developing thrombotic complications secondary to insufficient platelet inhibition. The PINPOINT study could provide a valuable insight into the knowledge regarding ticagrelor action in STEMI vs. NSTEMI patients. Since there is no reference study comparing pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor in STEMI and NSTEMI patients, we decided to perform an internal pilot study of approximately 30 patients (15 patients with each type of myocardial infarction) for estimating the final sample size.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
73
180 mg loading dose
Cardiology Department, Dr. A. Jurasz University Hospital
Bydgoszcz, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for ticagrelor (AUC 0-6h)
Time frame: prior to the initial dose and 30min, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 6h post dose
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for AR-C124910XX (AUC 0-6h)
Time frame: prior to the initial dose and 30min, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 6h post dose
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for ticagrelor (AUC 0-12h)
Time frame: prior to the initial dose and 30min, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 12h post dose
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for AR-C124910XX (AUC 0-12h)
Time frame: prior to the initial dose and 30min, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 12h post dose
Maximum concentration (Cmax) of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX
Time frame: 12 hours
Time to maximum concentration (Cmax) for ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX
Time frame: 12 hours
Platelet reactivity index (PRI) assessed by VASP assay
Time frame: prior to the initial dose and 30min, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 12h post dose
Platelet reactivity assessed by Multiple Electrode Aggregometry
It will be assessed in all predefined time points in all study participants except those treated with GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors.
Time frame: prior to the initial dose and 30min, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 12h post dose
Percentage of patients with high platelet reactivity (HPR) after the loading dose of ticagrelor assessed with VASP and Multiple Electrode Aggregometry
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 2 hours
Time to reach platelet reactivity below the cut-off value for HPR evaluated with VASP and Multiple Electrode Aggregometry
Time frame: 12 hours