In actual practice the patients with mild or moderate lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms receive an epidural infiltration and participate in kyphosis reeducation in first intention. Yet the kyphosis reeducation did not show a real profit in the time compared with the natural evolution of the pathology. The study assume that the spinal mobility reeducation will reduce the incidence of pain recurrences compared with the classic kyphosis reeducation.
The standard treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis is the lumbar canal recalibration surgery which presents co-morbidity factors and risks of post-operative complications. The non-invasive methods are a good alternative compared with the surgery : the patients medically treated present few damages and the results of the postponed surgery are equivalent to the immediate surgery. That is why a non-surgical treatment is proposed in first intention to the patients with mild or moderate symptoms : this treatment associates an epidural infiltration and a kyphosis reeducation. Yet the kyphosis reeducation did not show a real profit in the time compared with the natural evolution of the pathology. The benefits of the infiltration are lost three months after this one in 80 % of the cases. A return to physical activity and a restored spinal mobility would improve the duration of the infiltration effect. The objective is then to compare the efficiency of a spinal mobility reeducation program versus a kyphosis reeducation program in patients with acquired and central lumbar spinal stenosis. It is a prospective, monocentric, randomized, superiority and parallel-group study : * group C (control group) : kyphosis reeducation + patient education + auto-reeducation at home, * group M (test group) : spinal mobility reeducation + patient education + auto-reeducation at home.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
23
* kyphosis reeducation on Huber platform during 2 weeks, * patient education : on physiopathology of the lumbar spinal stenosis and treatments as well as healthy lifestyle and prevention (plans of anatomy, plastic column, slides of medical imaging), * flexibility exercises, stretching exercises and abdominal muscles exercises : to continue at home (the exercises will be reported on a book that will be given to the patient), * exercises on cycle ergometer or walking on treadmill : to continue at home.
* spinal mobility reeducation on Huber platform during 2 weeks, * patient education : on physiopathology of the lumbar spinal stenosis and treatments as well as healthy lifestyle and prevention (plans of anatomy, plastic column, slides of medical imaging), * flexibility exercises and mobilization exercises : to continue at home (the exercises will be reported on a book that will be given to the patient), * exercises on cycle ergometer or walking on treadmill : to continue at home.
University Hospital of Bordeaux - Hospital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, France
maximal walking distance
: ratio between the maximal walking distance at the 90 days visit and the maximal walking distance at the Day 4 in percent. Walking on a plane road, 70 m in length, without obstacle and with markings every 10 meters (total length : not more than 2 km).
Time frame: the 90 days visit
evaluation of the lumbar pain
evaluation of the lumbar pain: measured by a verbal analog scale 0-100 mm (0 : no pain, 100 : maximal pain),
Time frame: Day 0
evaluation of the lumbar pain
evaluation of the lumbar pain: measured by a verbal analog scale 0-100 mm (0 : no pain, 100 : maximal pain),
Time frame: Day 4
evaluation of the lumbar pain
evaluation of the lumbar pain: measured by a verbal analog scale 0-100 mm (0 : no pain, 100 : maximal pain),
Time frame: Day 30
evaluation of the lumbar pain
evaluation of the lumbar pain: measured by a verbal analog scale 0-100 mm (0 : no pain, 100 : maximal pain),
Time frame: Day 90
evaluation of the lumbar pain
evaluation of the lumbar pain: measured by a verbal analog scale 0-100 mm (0 : no pain, 100 : maximal pain),
Time frame: Day 365
evaluation of the radicular pain
measured by a verbal analog scale 0-100 mm (0 : no pain, 100 : maximal pain),
Time frame: Day 0
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
evaluation of the radicular pain
measured by a verbal analog scale 0-100 mm (0 : no pain, 100 : maximal pain),
Time frame: Day 4
evaluation of the radicular pain
measured by a verbal analog scale 0-100 mm (0 : no pain, 100 : maximal pain),
Time frame: Day 30
evaluation of the radicular pain
measured by a verbal analog scale 0-100 mm (0 : no pain, 100 : maximal pain),
Time frame: Day 90
evaluation of the radicular pain
measured by a verbal analog scale 0-100 mm (0 : no pain, 100 : maximal pain),
Time frame: Day 365
evaluation scales
evaluation scales : score of Quebec (functional impotence)
Time frame: Day 0
evaluation scales
evaluation scales : score of Quebec (functional impotence)
Time frame: Day 4
evaluation scales
evaluation scales : score of Quebec (functional impotence)
Time frame: Day 30
evaluation scales
evaluation scales : score of Quebec (functional impotence)
Time frame: Day 90
evaluation scales
evaluation scales : score of Quebec (functional impotence)
Time frame: Day 365
maximal walking distance
maximal walking distance : on a defined road
Time frame: Day 0
maximal walking distance
maximal walking distance : on a defined road
Time frame: Day 4
maximal walking distance
maximal walking distance : on a defined road
Time frame: Day 30
maximal walking distance
maximal walking distance : on a defined road
Time frame: Day 90
maximal walking distance
maximal walking distance : on a defined road
Time frame: Day 365
compliance with the auto-reeducation at home
compliance with the auto-reeducation at home : questionnaire.
Time frame: Day 30
compliance with the auto-reeducation at home
compliance with the auto-reeducation at home : questionnaire.
Time frame: Day 90
compliance with the auto-reeducation at home
compliance with the auto-reeducation at home : questionnaire.
Time frame: Day 365
Score of Japanese Orthopaedic Association (llumbar radiculopathy)
Time frame: Day 4
Score of Japanese Orthopaedic Association (llumbar radiculopathy)
Time frame: Day 30
Score of Japanese Orthopaedic Association (llumbar radiculopathy)
Time frame: Day 90
Score of Japanese Orthopaedic Association (llumbar radiculopathy)
Time frame: Day 365
score of "Douleur Neuropathique 4" (DN4 - neuropathy)
Time frame: Day 4
score of "Douleur Neuropathique 4" (DN4 - neuropathy)
Time frame: Day 30
score of "Douleur Neuropathique 4" (DN4 - neuropathy)
Time frame: Day 90
score of "Douleur Neuropathique 4" (DN4 - neuropathy)
Time frame: Day 365
score Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey 12 (health status)
Time frame: Day 4
score Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey 12 (health status)
Time frame: Day 30
score Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey 12 (health status)
Time frame: Day 90
score Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey 12 (health status)
Time frame: Day 365