The primary objective of the study is to assess the long-term safety of dupilumab in pediatric participants with AD. The secondary objectives of the study are: * To assess the long-term efficacy of dupilumab in pediatric participants with AD * To assess the trough concentrations of functional dupilumab in serum and the immunogenicity in pediatric participants with AD after re-treatment with dupilumab Optional Pre-filled Pen (PFP) Sub-Study in pediatric patients ≥2 to \<12 years of age with AD Co-Primary Objectives are: * To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) of dupilumab PFPs * To evaluate the safety of dupilumab PFPs Secondary Objective is: \- To evaluate the immunogenicity of dupilumab PFPs
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
880
Weight-tiered dosing administered subcutaneous (SC)
Regeneron Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Bakersfield, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
Rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) per participant year from baseline through the last study visit
Time frame: Baseline up to week 272
Number of participants with at least one TEAE per participant year from baseline through the last study visit
Time frame: Baseline up to week 272
OPTIONAL SUB-STUDY: Pharmacokinetic (PK) of dupilumab: Peak concentration (Cmax)
Peak serum concentration after multiple doses of dupilumab administered using the PFP (test) relative to the prefilled syringe (reference)
Time frame: Up to week 16
OPTIONAL SUB-STUDY: PK of dupilumab: Trough concentration (Ctrough)
Drug concentration in serum after multiple doses of dupilumab administered using the PFP (test) relative to the prefilled syringe (reference)
Time frame: Up to week 16
OPTIONAL SUB-STUDY: Incidence of TEAEs during the 12-week PFP treatment period and during entire sub-study
Time frame: Up to week 16
OPTIONAL SUB-STUDY: Incidence of SAEs during the 12-week PFP treatment period and during entire sub-study
Time frame: Up to week 16
Number of treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) from baseline through the last study visit
Time frame: Baseline up to week 272
Incidence of TEAEs of special interest from baseline through the last study visit
Time frame: Baseline up to week 272
Proportion of participants with an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) at all in-clinic visits post-baseline
Time frame: Baseline up to week 272
Proportion of participants with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)-75 (≥75% reduction in EASI from baseline of parent study) response at all in-clinic visits post-baseline
Time frame: Baseline up to week 272
Change from baseline in EASI score at all in-clinic visits post-baseline
Time frame: Baseline up to week 272
Percent change from baseline in EASI at all in-clinic visits post-baseline
Time frame: Baseline up to week 272
Change from baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) affected by AD (BSA) at all in-clinic visits post-baseline
Time frame: Baseline up to week 272
Percent change from baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at all in-clinic visits post-baseline
Time frame: Baseline up to week 272
Change from baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) for participants ≥4 years of age at all in-clinic visits post-baseline in which the assessments are planned to be performed
Time frame: Baseline up to week 272
Change from baseline in Infants' Dermatology Quality of Life Index (IDQOL) for participants <4 years of age at all in-clinic visits post-baseline in which the assessments are planned to be performed
Time frame: Baseline up to week 272
Proportion of responders (defined as participants with IGA 0 or 1) who maintain IGA 0 or 1 during at least 75% of the subsequent* visits during the treatment period
\*Subsequent refers to the visits following the first visit at which IGA 0 or 1 is achieved.
Time frame: Baseline to week 260
For responders (defined as participants with IGA 0 or 1), median percentage of subsequent* visits during the treatment period, at which IGA 0 or 1 is maintained
\*Subsequent refers to the visits following the first visit at which IGA 0 or 1 is achieved.
Time frame: Baseline to week 260
Number of AD flares during the study
AD flares are defined as worsening of the disease that requires escalation/intensification of AD treatment
Time frame: Baseline to week 272
Annualize event rate of AD flares during the study
AD flares are defined as worsening of the disease that requires escalation/intensification of AD treatment
Time frame: Baseline to week 272
Proportion of participants with at least one flare during the study
AD flares are defined as worsening of the disease that requires escalation/intensification of AD treatment
Time frame: Baseline to week 272
Proportion of well-controlled weeks
Well-controlled weeks are those for which participants or parents/caregivers answer "Yes" AND during which no rescue treatments were administered
Time frame: Baseline to week 272
OPTIONAL SUB-STUDY: Incidence and titer of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (ADA) (PFP Sub-Study)
Time frame: Up to 16 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Regeneron Investigational site
Mission Viejo, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Orange, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Palo Alto, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Rolling Hills Estates, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
San Diego, California, United States
...and 74 more locations