This study is recruiting two groups of women over the age of 18; those who are pregnant and who have pre-eclampsia; and those who are pregnant but do not have pre-eclampsia. The aim is to test a new method of diagnosing and monitoring pre-eclampsia and thus prevent the long-term damage it can cause to the baby's health. Untreated, pre-eclampsia can lead to seizures in pregnancy (eclampsia) and may prove fatal for mother and child. Currently the only effective treatment for pre-eclampsia is control of the mother's blood pressure until it is safe to deliver the baby. The timing of delivery is kept under constant review by the medical team, who must balance the risk to the mother of developing eclampsia against the risk to the baby of being born too early (premature). If pre-eclampsia can be diagnosed early, there is a greater chance of being able to treat it effectively. We know that women with pre-eclampsia often have exaggerated reflexes in their limbs (hyperreflexia) and that this may be linked to the risk of seizures. Measuring these reflexes might therefore be a useful way to diagnose and monitor pre-eclampsia, but doing this is not easy, so we want to assess whether measuring other reaction times might similarly help assess the risk of seizures. One possibility is by measuring the reaction time as we flick our eyes to follow a moving target, using an instrument called a saccadometer, which is worn on a head-band, a little like a head-torch. By comparing the results between these groups and the non-pregnant women, we will be able to see if reaction times from the saccadometer are altered in women with pre-eclampsia, and, if so, whether saccadometry might be useful in helping doctors decide the best time for safe delivery.
Prospective feasibility study with two arms; (i) case-control comparisons of saccadic reaction time distributions between patients with preterm pre-eclampsia, age- and gestation-matched pregnant controls and age-matched female non-pregnant controls \[cross-sectional analysis\]; (ii) intra-individual comparisons of antenatal and postnatal saccadic reaction time distributions of patients with preterm pre-eclampsia \[longitudinal analysis\].
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
9
Oxford University Hospitals
Oxford, United Kingdom
Saccadic reaction times in patients with preterm pre-eclampsia
Attainment of 3000 saccades from women with preterm pre-eclampsia
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0)
Comparison of median latency of saccadic reaction time
Intra-individual and case control comparisons of saccadic reaction time median latency
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), twice per week from Day 0 for the duration of hospital stay (which is anticipated to be a maximum 10 weeks from Day 0), and then at Day 1, 5 and 42 postpartum
Comparison of standard deviation of saccadic reaction time median latency
Intra-individual and case control comparisons of standard deviation of saccadic reaction time median latency
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), twice per week from Day 0 for the duration of hospital stay (which is anticipated to be a maximum 10 weeks from Day 0), and then at Day 1, 5 and 42 postpartum
Comparison of standard deviation of early saccadic reaction time median latency
Intra-individual and case control comparisons of standard deviation of early saccadic reaction time median latency
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), twice per week from Day 0 for the duration of hospital stay (which is anticipated to be a maximum 10 weeks from Day 0), and then at Day 1, 5 and 42 postpartum
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.