This study aims to determine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with speech-language therapy is more beneficial than speech-language therapy alone in acute and chronic post-stroke aphasia.
This study aims to determine whether behavioral word-retrieval therapy coupled with anodal tDCS will improve the fluency and name retrieval performance of participants with post-stroke aphasia more efficiently and for greater duration than language therapy alone (i.e. in the sham condition). tDCS neuronal targets will be selected in this order: 1. left posterior superior-middle temporal gyrus (an area critical for word retrieval and word comprehension), 2. left posterior frontal areas found to be responsible for lexical selection if the first area is infarcted, or 3. right cerebellum (important for learning, and consistently activated in naming task) if both of the other areas are infarcted. The same areas will be stimulated during the first tDCS and sham periods. If the participant returns for a second period of tDCS and sham with language therapy, the right cerebellum will be stimulated (if it was the only uninfarcted target area investigators will stimulate this area again). For cerebellar stimulation, either anodal or cathodal will be used as studies show that anodal or cathodal stimulation has an effect on cognitive functions.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Stimulation will be delivered by a battery-driven constant current stimulator. The electrical current will be administered to a pre-specified region of the brain not affected by the lesion(perilesional areas, right hemisphere or cerebellum). The stimulation will be delivered at an intensity of 2mA (estimated current density 0.04 mA/cm2; estimated total charge 0.048C/cm2) in a ramp-like fashion for a maximum of 20 minutes. Speech-language therapy will be oral and written naming.
Speech-Language therapy will be administered during sham stimulation. Current will be administered in a ramp-line fashion but after the ramping the intensity will drop to 0 mA. Speech-language therapy will be oral and written naming.
Johns Hopkins Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Change in picture naming scores in trained and untrained items
Time frame: Before and after 15 sessions of intervention (3 weeks) and at 2 weeks and 2 months follow-ups
Change in Philadelphia Naming Test: Picture naming of everyday objects, different from training set
Time frame: Before and after 15 sessions of intervention (3 weeks) and at 2 weeks and 2 months follow-ups
Change in Written naming of objects and actions
The investigators will evaluate the absolute number as well as the percent change of the list of objects and actions assigned for intervention as trained and untrained items.
Time frame: Before and after 15 sessions of intervention (3 weeks) and at 2 weeks and 2 months follow-ups
Change in working memory (digit span)
Time frame: Before and after 15 sessions of intervention (3 weeks) and at 2 weeks and 2 months follow-ups
Change in verbal fluency
The investigators will use letter (F, A, S) and semantic fluency measures (animals, fruits and vegetables) and the investigators will measure how many were added or omitted at follow-up intervals.
Time frame: Before and after 15 sessions of intervention (3 weeks) and at 2 weeks and 2 months follow-ups
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.