The Macular Edema Ranibizumab v. Intravitreal anti-inflammatory Therapy (MERIT) Trial will compare the relative efficacy and safety of intravitreal methotrexate, intravitreal ranibizumab, and the intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of uveitic macular edema persisting or reoccurring after an intravitreal corticosteroid injection. MERIT is a parallel design (1:1:1), randomized comparative trial with an anniversary close-out after 6 months of follow-up. The primary outcome is percent change in central subfield thickness from the baseline OCT measurement to the 12 week visit.
Macular edema (ME) is the most common structural complication and cause of visual impairment and legal blindness in uveitis patients. Traditional approaches to the treatment of uveitic ME have included the use of regional corticosteroid therapy, delivered periocularly, including posterior sub-Tenon's and orbital floor injections, or via the intravitreal route. While corticosteroid injections may reduce ME and improve vision, the effect is often variable with a limited duration. Persistent macular edema is a common occurrence and often requires repeated intravitreal injections of corticosteroids, which expose eyes to a significant risk of increased intraocular pressure ocular and cataract development. The often refractory nature of uveitic ME and its impact on visual function underscores the need to identify effective alternative medical therapeutic options. Recent pilot studies have shown intravitreal methotrexate (MTX) and intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis®, Genentech Inc., San Francisco, CA) to be promising treatments for uveitic ME, and intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®, Allergan, Irvine, CA) has recently been approved by the U.S. FDA for uveitic ME in patients with non-infectious uveitis. In addition to being effective, intravitreal MTX and ranibizumab potentially may have less ocular side effects than corticosteroids, particularly less IOP elevation. However, the relative efficacy of these treatments is unknown. The Macular Edema Ranibizumab v. Intravitreal anti-inflammatory Therapy (MERIT) Trial will compare the relative efficacy and safety of intravitreal methotrexate, ranibizumab, and dexamethasone implant. MERIT is a parallel design (1:1:1), randomized comparative effectiveness trial with an anniversary close-out after 6 months of follow-up. The primary outcome is percent change in central subfield thickness from the baseline OCT measurement to the 12 week visit.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
194
Standard preparation as described for intravitreal injections.
Intravitreal Methotrexate 400 µg injection procedures should be carried out under controlled aseptic conditions which include the use of sterile gloves and a sterile eyelid speculum (or equivalent). Adequate anesthesia and a broad-spectrum microbicide such as betadine, applied to the periocular skin, eyelid and ocular surface are required prior to the injection.
Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg injection procedures should be carried out under controlled aseptic conditions which include the use of sterile gloves and a sterile eyelid speculum (or equivalent). Adequate anesthesia and a broad-spectrum microbicide such as betadine, applied to the periocular skin, eyelid and ocular surface are required prior to the injection.
Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Anne Bates Leach Eye Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Proportion of Baseline Central Subfield Thickness Observed at 12 Weeks
The primary outcome is the change in central subfield thickness from baseline to 12 weeks measured on a relative scale as the the proportion of the baseline central subfield thickness. The proportion of baseline subfield thickness is estimated by a mixed effect model that includes time points for baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 and the treatment group. The treatment effect is the interaction (product) of time point and treatment. Contrasts of the model parameter estimates were used to calculate the change from baseline to week 12 and the comparison between treatment groups. Values less than 1 indicate a decrease in retinal thickness with lower values indicating greater decreases (improvement).The OCT outcomes were measured by masked readers. The 12-week visit was chosen as the time to assess the primary outcome because of the ranibizumab treatment schedule and the peak effect time for dexamethasone
Time frame: At 12-week visit
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
...and 23 more locations