This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of lenalidomide when given together with rituximab-ifosfamide-carboplatin-etoposide (R-ICE) and to see how well they work in treating patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that has returned after a period of improvement (relapsed) and that has not responded to previous treatment (refractory). Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide, and lenalidomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving lenalidomide with R-ICE may be a better treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the addition of lenalidomide to the R-ICE chemoimmunotherapy regimen (lenalidomide-rituximab-ifosfamide-carboplatin-etoposide \[R2ICE\]) for the treatment of primary-refractory/first-relapse B-cell lymphoma. (Phase I) II. To determine if the addition of lenalidomide (based on dose determination from phase I) to the R-ICE chemoimmunotherapy regimen (R2-ICE) would lead to clinically meaningful improvement in the overall response rates (ORR) for patients with first-relapse/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). (Phase II) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the effect of the addition of lenalidomide to RICE on the number (percentage) of patients proceeding to stem cell transplant (SCT). II. To evaluate the effect of the addition of lenalidomide to RICE on other surrogate outcome measures including complete metabolic response (CMR) rate and overall survival. III. To describe the toxicities associated with the addition of lenalidomide to the R-ICE chemoimmunotherapy regimen (R2ICE). CORRELATIVE RESEARCH OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate ORR based on germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) versus non-GCB subtypes. II. To evaluate ORR based on percent standardized uptake value (SUV) reduction and percent anatomic size reduction on interim positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scans. III. To evaluate ORR based on minimal residual disease (MRD) detection (positive versus \[vs.\] negative) and quantification after 2 cycles of treatment. IV. Future tissue and blood based studies. OUTLINE: This is a phase I, dose-escalation study of lenalidomide followed by a phase II study. Patients receive lenalidomide orally (PO) daily on days 1-14, rituximab intravenously (IV) on day 1, ifosfamide IV over 24 hours on day 2, carboplatin IV over 1-2 hours on day 2, and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 2 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients achieving CMR, partial metabolic response (PMR), or no metabolic response (NMR) may receive 2 more cycles per physician discretion. After completion of 2 cycles of R2ICE treatment, patients achieving objective status of CMR, PMR or NMR may proceed to SCT during the event monitoring phase. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 3 years and then every 6 months for 2 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV
Correlative studies
Given PO
Given IV
Mayo Clinic in Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Carle Cancer Center NCI Community Oncology Research Program
Urbana, Illinois, United States
University of Iowa/Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Siouxland Regional Cancer Center
Sioux City, Iowa, United States
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Coborn Cancer Center at Saint Cloud Hospital
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States
Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center/Dartmouth Cancer Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
State University of New York Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, United States
...and 2 more locations
Overall Response Rate (Phase II)
Will be defined as a complete metabolic response or partial metabolic response. The proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated according to the approach of Duffy and Santner.
Time frame: At 42 days (after 2 courses) of treatment
Proportion of Patients Proceeding to Stem Cell Transplant
Estimated by the number of patients who proceed to transplant divided by \> the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated.
Time frame: At 42 days of treatment
Complete Metabolic Response Rate
Estimated by the number of patients with an objective status of complete metabolic response divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true complete metabolic response rate will be calculated.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Overall Survival
The percentage of participants alive will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time frame: From registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.