This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of ertugliflozin to metformin monotherapy in Asian participants with Type 2 diabetes mellitis (T2DM) who have inadequate glycemic control on metformin monotherapy. The primary hypothesis is that the mean reduction from baseline in HbA1C for 15 mg and 5 mg ertugliflozin (tested sequentially) is greater than for placebo.
This study includes a 1-week screening period, an 8-week (or greater) antihyperglycemic agent (AHA) wash-off and/or metformin dose stable period (as necessary), a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period, a 26-week double-blind treatment period, and a post-treatment telephone contact 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
506
Ertugliflozin 5 mg oral tablet taken once daily
Ertugliflozin 15 mg (5-mg and 10-mg tablets) oral taken once daily
Placebo matching ertugliflozin (5-mg and/or 10-mg tablet) oral taken once daily
Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach)
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.
Time frame: Up to 28 weeks
Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Participants are to remain on their stable doses of metformin (oral, \>=1500 mg/day) while receiving blinded investigational product during the double-blind treatment period. Participants on metformin \<1500 at screening are up-titrated to \>= 1500 daily.
Glycemic rescue therapy with open-label glimepiride will be initiated in participants with glucose values exceeding protocol-specified values. Dosing and titration of open-label glimepiride rescue therapy will be at the Investigator's discretion.
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.
Time frame: Up to 28 weeks
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach)
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.
Time frame: Up to 26 weeks
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.
Time frame: Up to 26 weeks
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)
Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 26 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 26 minus FPG at Week 0) which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 26 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 26 minus FPG at Week 0) which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)
The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 26 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 26 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach)
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Week 26
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Week 26
Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)
This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) minus the Week 0 sitting SBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) minus the Week 0 sitting SBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)
This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) minus the Week 0 sitting DBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) minus the Week 0 sitting DBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach)
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Week 26
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Week 26
Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26.
Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.
Time frame: Week 26
Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26 (China Subpopulation)
Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.
Time frame: Week 26
Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy
Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.
Time frame: Up to 183 days
Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy (China Subpopulation)
Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.
Time frame: Up to 149 days
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 6: Pre-Dose
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 12: Pre-Dose
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 12: 60 min. Post-Dose
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 18: Pre-Dose
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 18: 60 min. Post-Dose
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 26: Pre-Dose
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 6: Pre-Dose
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 12: Pre-Dose
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 12: 60 min. Post-Dose
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 18: Pre-Dose
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 18: 60 min. Post-Dose
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 26: Pre-Dose