This is a study that aims to evaluate the feasibility of undertaking a United Kingdom (UK) multi-centre randomised controlled trial of BET for the treatment of moderate (grade 2 or 3) retraction pockets (RPs). This future study will aim to address the question: Does BET improve symptoms scores, audiometry and otoscopic appearance of Grade 2-3 pars tensa RPs in adult patients? Currently conservative treatments for this condition has been shown to be ineffective; there is a significant risk of progression to hearing loss or more serious complications in untreated retraction pockets; and the surgical treatments available to us in the UK not only have a number of risks and drawbacks, but also do not aim to treat the underlying cause (Eustachian Tube dysfunction (ETD)).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty = dilatation of the cartilaginous Eustachian tube with a balloon catheter device performed with endoscopic control under general anaesthetic
Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust
Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom
Acceptability
Acceptability of the procedure, which will be assessed with pre- and post-procedure using the the seven-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7).
Time frame: 6 months
Patient Focus Group
Thematic analysis of Patient Focus Group discussions. Standardised questions and focus group discussion with patients with (i) un-operated asymptomatic Retraction Pockets (RPs), (ii) un-operated symptomatic RPs, (iii) RPs treated with cartilage tympanoplasty, and (iv) RPs treated with BET. These will qualitatively assess (as appropriate) positive and negative aspects of patient experience, such as living with the RP, the procedure itself, their recovery, any after effects, and participating in the study. Focus groups will consist of 6 patients in each group.
Time frame: 6 months
Complications
An assessment of the number of complications in the 20 participants undergoing BET will also be performed as a marker of safety of the procedure.
Time frame: 6 months
Demand
Demand assessed by recruitment rate
Time frame: 1 year
Cost analysis of treatment
Cost analysis of BET vs. cartilage tympanoplasty
Time frame: 1 year
Comparison of otoendoscopy images
Comparison of otoendoscopy images by two experienced observers and computer software (ImageJ). Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6 months.
Time frame: Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6 months.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Ability to perform Valsalva
Ability to perform Valsalva measured as always, sometimes or never. Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6.
Time frame: Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6 months.
Tympanometry
Tympanometry (peak middle ear pressure and compliance, and Jerger grade (Improved, unchanged, worse)). Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6 months.
Time frame: Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6 months.
pure-tone average (PTA) hearing loss
PTA (air conduction at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8kHz; bone conduction at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 kHz) with calculation of air bone gap at 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4kHz. Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6 months
Time frame: Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6 months.