This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of pre-operative artesunate given orally once a day for 14 days prior to surgery in patients with Stage II/III colorectal cancer. Artesunate is an established antimalarial drug with an excellent safety profile, is well tolerated and affordable. A number of laboratory studies and one small pilot clinical study in patients with colorectal cancer have shown that artesunate can reduce the proliferation and growth of cancer cells. Two hundred patients diagnosed with Stage II/III operable colorectal cancer will be randomly allocated to receive oral artesunate 200mg daily or a matching placebo for 14 days prior to surgery. Patients will be followed up closely for 5 years to see if giving artesunate preoperatively reduces the risk of cancer recurring after surgery.
Artesunate is an established antimalarial drug belonging to the artemisinin class of drugs, has an excellent safety profile, is well tolerated and affordable. In last two decades, artemisinins have shown potent and broad anticancer properties in a range of cell lines and animal models, supporting the hypothesis that artemisinins have the potential to be an effective anti-cancer therapy. Multiple potential mechanisms of action include anti-proliferative effects through cell-cycle disruption, reactive oxygen species (ROS) -induced DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, anti-angiogenesis, immunomodulation and induced radiosensitivity. Despite a multi-modality treatment approach to colorectal cancer, 5 year overall survival does not currently exceed 60%. Neoadjuvant pre-operative therapy may be more effective at eradicating micrometastases compared to adjuvant therapy delivered following the delay and immunological stress of surgery. However current neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens are often associated with significant side effects and may result in a delay in surgery whilst patients recover. A well tolerated, affordable, novel anticancer agent that could be given to patients whilst they wait for surgery, without causing a surgical delay due to treatment related toxicity, would have a significant clinical impact on patient care. The NeoART trial is a phase II multicentre randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial (RCT) for patients undergoing primary surgery for Stage II/III colorectal cancers. Patients are randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive either a two week course of neoadjuvant artesunate 200mg once daily or matching placebo. Both patients and health care professionals are blinded to treatment allocation arm to minimise outcome-reporting bias. The primary endpoint of the trial is recurrence free survival two years after surgery. Secondary endpoints include 2 and 5 year overall survival, treatment related toxicity, tolerability and patient quality of life. A translational sub-study looking at predictive and prognostic biomarkers is also planned.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
200
Artesunate 200mg PO OD for 14 days prior to colorectal resection surgery
Matched placebo PO OD for 14 days prior to colorectal resection surgery
Medway Maritime Hospital
Gillingham, Kent, United Kingdom
COMPLETEDKent Oncology Centre, Maidstone Hospital
Maidstone, Kent, United Kingdom
COMPLETEDBarking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
Barking, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGAshford & St Peters Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Chertsey, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Derby, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGSt George's University Hospitals NHS Fundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGNorfolk & Norwich University Hospitlas NHS FT
Norwich, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGShrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust
Shrewsbury, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGRecurrence free survival at 2 years
Time frame: 2 years following study randomisation.
Recurrence free survival at 5 years
Time frame: 5 years from study randomisation
Overall survival at 2 and 5 years
Time frame: 2 and 5 years from study randomisation
Colon cancer specific death at 2 and 5 years
Time frame: 2 and 5 years from study randomisation
Number of patients experiencing artesunate drug related toxicity as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment at Day 7 following start of study intervention (artesunate/matching placebo)
Number of patients experiencing artesunate drug related toxicity as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment at Day 14 following start of study intervention (artesunate/matching placebo)
Number of patients experiencing artesunate drug related toxicity as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment at Day 42 following start of study intervention (artesunate/matching placebo)
Adverse events affecting patients as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment at Day 7 following study intervention
Adverse events affecting patients as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment at Day 14 following study intervention
Adverse events affecting patients as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment at Day 42 following study intervention
Adverse events affecting patients as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment 6 months following study intervention
Adverse events affecting patients as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment 12 months following study intervention
Adverse events affecting patients as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment 18 months following study intervention
Adverse events affecting patients as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment 24 months following study intervention
Adverse events affecting patients as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment 30 months following study intervention
Adverse events affecting patients as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment 36 months following study intervention
Adverse events affecting patients as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment 42 months following study intervention
Adverse events affecting patients as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment 48 months following study intervention
Adverse events affecting patients as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment 54 months following study intervention
Adverse events affecting patients as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Time frame: Assessment 60 months following study intervention
Pathological assessment of tumour regression (involvement of lymph nodes; serosa; resection margin)
Time frame: Post surgical pathology review (following Day 14 of study intervention)
Patient quality of life
Using validated quality of life self-administered questionnaires
Time frame: Assessment at Day 1 of study intervention
Patient quality of life
Using validated quality of life self-administered questionnaires
Time frame: Assessment at Day 7 of study intervention
Patient quality of life
Using validated quality of life self-administered questionnaires
Time frame: Assessment at Day 14 of study intervention
Patient quality of life
Using validated quality of life self-administered questionnaires
Time frame: Assessment at Day 42 of study intervention
Surgical complications
Number of patients with surgery related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time frame: From time of surgery up to 3 months post surgery
Predictive value of tumour marker Carcinoma Embryonic Antigen (CEA) kinetics in terms of predicting response to artesunate therapy
Time frame: Assessment at Day 1 of study intervention
Predictive value of tumour marker Carcinoma Embryonic Antigen (CEA) kinetics in terms of predicting response to artesunate therapy
Time frame: Assessment at Day 7 of study intervention
Predictive value of tumour marker Carcinoma Embryonic Antigen (CEA) kinetics in terms of predicting response to artesunate therapy
Time frame: Assessment at Day 14 of study intervention
Predictive value of tumour marker Carcinoma Embryonic Antigen (CEA) kinetics in terms of predicting response to artesunate therapy
Time frame: Assessment at Day 42 of study intervention
Immunohistochemical analyses of paraffin-embedded tumour sections to assess Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (Kras) mutation status
Number of patients with Kras mutant tumours
Time frame: Pre and post intervention tumour samples from patients (Day 0 and Day 15)
Immunohistochemical analyses of paraffin-embedded tumour sections to assess Mismatch Repair (MMR) status
Number of patients with Mismatch Repair (MMR) mutant tumours
Time frame: Pre and post intervention tumour samples from patients (Day 0 and Day 15)
Immunohistochemical analyses of paraffin-embedded tumour for v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) mutation status
Number of patients with BRAF mutant tumours
Time frame: Pre and post intervention tumour samples from patients (Day 0 and Day 15)
Immunohistochemical analyses of paraffin-embedded tumour for Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) expression
Number of patients whose tumours show PDGF upregulation/downregulation following treatment intervention
Time frame: Pre and post intervention tumour samples from patients (Day 0 and Day 15)
Immunohistochemical analyses of paraffin-embedded tumour for Platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) expression
Number of patients whose tumours show PDGFR upregulation/downregulation following study intervention
Time frame: Pre and post intervention tumour samples from patients (Day 0 and Day 15)
Immunohistochemical analyses of paraffin-embedded tumour for Vascular endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) expression
Number of patients whose tumours show VEGF upregulation/downregulation following study intervention
Time frame: Pre and post intervention tumour samples from patients (Day 0 and Day 15)
Immunohistochemical analyses of paraffin-embedded tumour on Vascular endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR) expression
Number of patients whose tumours show VEGFR upregulation/downregulation following study intervention
Time frame: Pre and post intervention tumour samples from patients (Day 0 and Day 15)
Determination of proliferative activity (Ki-67 staining, Cluster of Differentiation 31 protein (CD31) staining)
Number of patients whose tumours show an increase or reduction in proliferation markers Ki67 and CD31 following study intervention
Time frame: Pre and post intervention tumour samples from patients (Day 0 and Day 15)
Determination of activation of the Deoxyribonucleic acid damage response (DDR) pathway
Number of patients whose tumour samples show activation of the DDR pathway following study intervention
Time frame: Pre and post intervention tumour samples from patients (Day 0 and Day 15)
Wnt/β-catenin proliferation pathway protein expression (e.g. c-myc and cyclinD1 proteins)
Number of patients who show an increase or a decrease in expression of proteins involved in the Wnt/β-catenin proliferation pathway (e.g. c-myc and cyclinD1 proteins) following study intervention
Time frame: Pre and post intervention tumour samples from patients (Day 0 and Day 15)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.