This randomized pilot clinical trial studies hypnotherapy in treating chronic pain in cancer survivors. Hypnotherapy is a state of concentration and focused attention which can provide more control over the experience of acute and chronic pain and its impact and may provide comfort, maximize function, and improve quality of life in cancer survivors.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To test the feasibility (recruitment, attrition, adherence, logistical issues) of delivering the hypnosis (hypnotherapy) intervention to cancer survivors with chronic pain. II. To evaluate the acceptability of the hypnosis intervention among cancer survivors with chronic pain. III. To explore preliminary efficacy (estimate effect size) of hypnosis in relieving pain and improving associated anxiety and functional performance at 4 weeks and 8 weeks compared to a wait-list control. OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 groups. IMMEDIATE INTERVENTION GROUP: Participants undergo hypnotherapy session over 20-30 minutes using a standardized script for pain reduction that contains post-hypnotic suggestions for permanence of hypnotherapy benefits. The hypnotherapy session is recorded and the participant listens to the recording daily for 4 weeks. WAIT-LIST CONTROL GROUP: At week 5, participants undergo hypnotherapy session over 20-30 minutes using a standardized script for pain reduction that contains post-hypnotic suggestions for permanence of hypnotherapy benefits. The hypnotherapy session is recorded and the participant listens to the recording daily for 4 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
39
Undergo hypnotherapy
Ancillary studies
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, United States
Acceptability of hypnotherapy determined by structured phone interviews with participants
Transcribed interview data and open-ended responses from the pre- post-Intervention Questionnaire will be organized in ATLAS.ti. Content analysis will be used to understand the hypnosis experience. Consensus on key ideas and concepts will be obtained by the Lead Sub-Investigator and research assistant after reading and coding each transcript separately.
Time frame: At week 8
Change in beliefs on how well the treatment might work, as measured by the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire
To evaluate the effects of the intervention on efficacy endpoints, general linear modeling will be used. Participants will be a random effect. There will be 2 fixed effects (time, group) and 1 interaction effect (time X group). The interaction between group x time will show if the groups change differentially (whether intervention moderates change in outcome). Within the wait-list, O2 and O3 will be compared (paired t-test) to see if the wait-list replicates the immediate group's results. Within the immediate group, sustained effects of post-intervention results will be assessed by testing for
Time frame: Baseline to up to 8 weeks
Change in imaginative involvement as measured by the Tellegen Absorption Scale
To evaluate the effects of the intervention on efficacy endpoints, general linear modeling will be used. Participants will be a random effect. There will be 2 fixed effects (time, group) and 1 interaction effect (time X group). The interaction between group x time will show if the groups change differentially (whether intervention moderates change in outcome). Within the wait-list, O2 and O3 will be compared (paired t-test) to see if the wait-list replicates the immediate group's results. Within the immediate group, sustained effects of post-intervention results will be assessed by testing for
Time frame: Baseline to up to 8 weeks
Change in pain and anxiety, as measured using the patient diary
To evaluate the effects of the intervention on efficacy endpoints, general linear modeling will be used. Participants will be a random effect. There will be 2 fixed effects (time, group) and 1 interaction effect (time X group). The interaction between group x time will show if the groups change differentially (whether intervention moderates change in outcome). Within the wait-list, O2 and O3 will be compared (paired t-test) to see if the wait-list replicates the immediate group's results. Within the immediate group, sustained effects of post-intervention results will be assessed by testing for
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline to up to 8 weeks
Change in pain and anxiety, as measured using the Pre- Post-Intervention Questionnaire
To evaluate the effects of the intervention on efficacy endpoints, general linear modeling will be used. Participants will be a random effect. There will be 2 fixed effects (time, group) and 1 interaction effect (time X group). The interaction between group x time will show if the groups change differentially (whether intervention moderates change in outcome). Within the wait-list, O2 and O3 will be compared (paired t-test) to see if the wait-list replicates the immediate group's results. Within the immediate group, sustained effects of post-intervention results will be assessed by testing for
Time frame: Baseline to up to 8 weeks
Change in pain-associated anxiety, measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale
To evaluate effects of intervention on efficacy endpoints, general linear modeling will be used. Participants will be a random effect. There will be 2 fixed effects (time and group) \& 1 interaction effect (time X group). Interaction between group x time will tell if groups change differentially (whether intervention moderates change in outcome). Within wait-list, O2 \& O3 will be compared (paired t-test) to see if wait-list replicates immediate group's results. Within immediate group, sustained effects of post-intervention results will be assessed by testing for change across time to O3. During
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 scores (measures function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep, and pain interference and intensity)
To evaluate the effects of the intervention on efficacy endpoints, general linear modeling will be used. Participants will be a random effect. There will be 2 fixed effects (time, group) and 1 interaction effect (time X group). The interaction between group x time will show if the groups change differentially (whether intervention moderates change in outcome). Within the wait-list, O2 and O3 will be compared (paired t-test) to see if the wait-list replicates the immediate group's results. Within the immediate group, sustained effects of post-intervention results will be assessed by testing for
Time frame: Baseline to up to 8 weeks
Feasibility of delivering hypnotherapy in terms of recruitment, attrition, adherence, and logistical issues
A Consort flow diagram will be maintained to record the number of patients who were invited to participate in the study, number of patients who declined to participate and reasons why, number of patients who did not complete the study and reasons why, and adherence to using the intervention. Descriptive statistics (frequency counts, percentages) will be used to analyze the study recruitment, enrollment, and attrition data.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Patient demographics, as measured by the Demographic Questionnaire
Demographic variables will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. In order to examine variability and estimate effect sizes, the analysis needed in a larger trial will be modeled. Baseline demographic and dependent variables for the immediate and wait-list condition groups will be compared with Chi-square or independent t-tests.
Time frame: Baseline