Rapid volume expansion using repeated intravenous fluid boluses is a very common intervention performed in the intensive care unit (ICU) in the early days of resuscitation of patients with shock. Once passed the initial phase of resuscitation, the fluid boluses administered fail to effectively increase the patients' cardiac output in about 50% of cases. Pulse pressure changes or stroke volume changes induced by a Passive Leg Raising (PLR) test have acceptable/good ability to predict fluid responsiveness (in terms of cardiac output change) and may be systematically used in patients with persistent shock with the aim of limiting the total amount of fluid administered to patients by avoiding undue fluid boluses. One may suppose that such a volume expansion management policy could impact morbidity and mortality of shocked patients. Among the predictive indices available in clinical practice, the PLR test has the advantages of being usable regardless of the patients' respiratory status and cardiac rhythm. Changes in left ventricular stroke volume during the PLR test perform better that changes in pulse pressure to predict fluid responsiveness. However, in counterpart, pulse pressure changes during PLR can be assessed without the need of other hemodynamic exploration such central venous pressure measurement or cardiac output monitoring. The investigators hypothesized that strategies using either stroke volume changes or pulse pressure changes induced by the PLR test to decide wether a fluid bolus clinically deemed indicated should or should not be administered, may limit the amount of fluid received by the patients during the first 5 days of shock, improve their oxygenation index, and shorten the time passed under mechanical ventilation, as compared to a "liberal" strategy (usual care) that does not use predictive indices of fluid responsiveness.
A pilot, single-center, randomized, open-label, 3 parallel groups clinical trial with 1:1:1 assignment of interventions, comparing outcomes between patients with persistent shock assigned to either 1) the "Volume expansion guided by PLR-induced changes in Stroke Volume" strategy, or 2) the "Volume expansion guided by PLR-induced changes in Pulse Pressure" strategy, or 3) to usual care (i.e., without the use of any predictive index of fluid responsiveness). Patients in shock (either of septic, cardiac or other origin) will be included once passed the first hours of resuscitation. The time window for inclusion will be from 6 to 24 hours after the beginning of resuscitation, a delay necessary to ensure that initial hypovolemia has been fully compensated. The randomization will be stratified according to the presumed origin of shock (cardiac, septic, or other) and according to the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (\<200 or ≥ 200 mmHg). The randomly assigned intervention will be used during the first 5 days of shock (120 hours).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
98
Administration of the fluid bolus if deemed clinically necessary, OR if deemed clinically necessary AND PLR-induced SV or PP changes ≥10%, depending of the Arm the patient is assigned to
During the intervention period (from inclusion to the 120th hour), every time a fluid bolus is deemed necessary, fluid responsiveness will be assessed by Stroke Volume changes obtained at 1 min of a Passive Leg Raising (PLR) test (fluid will be given if PLR-induced stroke volume change is over 10%; in case stroke volume change is below 10%, fluid will not be given and need for fluid reassessed after a short period of time, as in usual care)
During the intervention period (from inclusion to the 120th hour), every time a fluid bolus is deemed necessary, fluid responsiveness will be assessed by Pulse Pressure changes obtained at 1 min of a Passive Leg Raising (PLR) test (fluid will be given if PLR-induced Pulse Pressure change is over 10%; in case Pulse Pressure change is below 10%, fluid will not be given and need for fluid reassessed after a short period of time, as in usual care)
Passive elevation of the legs of the patient, and lying down of the trunk (if patient is in the semi-recumbent position), preferably using electric bed. If not available, elevation of the legs by an assistant to a 45 degrees angle. Effects of Passive Leg Raising on Pulse Pressure or on Stroke Volume are used to assess fluid responsiveness in patients suffering from shock states.
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, France
Orléans, France
PaO2/FiO2 ratio changes
Time frame: from inclusion to the 24th hour after inclusion
ventilator free days
Every complication related to intravenous or arterial catheters inserted during the intensive care unit stay will be recorded
Time frame: ventilator free days between inclusion and the 28th day
Catheter-related complications
Every complication related to intravenous or arterial catheters inserted during the intensive care unit stay will be recorded
Time frame: from inclusion to the date of intensive care unit discharge, an average of 10 days
Fluid balance
Time frame: from inclusion to the 7th day
Immediate respiratory tolerance of fluid bolus (Yes or No)
Definition of immediate respiratory tolerance: SpO2 drops by less than 3% AND respiratory rate increase by less than 20% between before and after fluid bolus AND no occurrence of clinical pulmonary edema.
Time frame: at each fluid bolus administered during the intervention period (from inclusion to 120 hours later)
mortality rate
Time frame: at 28 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.