Antimalarial drug resistance has reached critical levels on the Thai-Cambodian border. Many have begun advocating for concerted malaria elimination efforts in Cambodia. However, there is currently no consensus on how malaria elimination is to be achieved with the tools available. In this study, the investigators will conduct operational research with the Royal Cambodian Armed Forces (RCAF) and National Malaria Center (CNM) to quantify the relative effectiveness of the two major interventional approaches - monthly malaria prophylaxis (MMP) or focused screening and treatment (FSAT) - in a head to-head comparison. In addition, the investigators will quantify the relative contribution of a recently advocated vector intervention for military personnel - the insecticide treated uniform (ITU) - in addition to other vector control measures currently employed by the RCAF. The investigators will employ the same permethrin insecticide self-application kits currently used by the US military. The investigators will estimate the cost effectiveness of each approach and attempt to define the best way forward for malaria elimination efforts in a critically important malaria reservoir in military population (and their dependents) who reside on the Thai-Cambodian border. The aim of the study is not only to conduct research to better define the best way forward in malaria elimination efforts in the high risk military populations, but to also build capacity within the RCAF to support and lead future elimination efforts in the most difficult-to-reach mobile populations.
This is a cluster-randomized, open label interventional study to determine the feasibility of achieving significant reduction in malaria cases in military encampments on the Thai-Cambodian border. The study will compare the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of monthly malaria prophylaxis (MMP) to monthly focused screening and treatment (FSAT). This study will thus investigate the effectiveness of two potential interventions for malaria elimination. Subjects in the monthly malaria prophylaxis (MMP) arm will receive a standard 3-day treatment course of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine on months 1, 2 and 3 and weekly low-dose primaquine (22.5mg for 12 weeks). Volunteers in the focused screening and treatment (FSAT) arm will be screened monthly and then treated for malaria following national treatment guidelines. For G6PD-deficient volunteers in the FSAT arm, primaquine will be administered weekly (45mg for 8 weeks) as radical curative and/or presumptive anti-relapse therapy. For G6PD normal volunteers with vivax infection, primaquine will be administered daily (15mg for 14 days). All FSAT volunteers with confirmed P. falciparum infection will receive a single, low dose (15mg) Primaquine as a P. falciparum transmission-blocking agent. The incremental benefit of an insecticide treated uniform (ITU) will also be assessed as a single-blind sham-controlled intervention in addition to personal protective measures currently employed by the RCAF. Volunteers will be followed monthly for a total of 6 months, to determine the proportion remaining malaria-free on day 180 following enrollment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,050
Administered monthly (weight-based) on days 1-3, during months 1, 2, and 3 in the MMP arm and also as a first line agent for P.v malaria recurrence in both MMP and FSAT treatment arms
22.5 mg weekly for 12 weeks in the MMP arm; low dose primaquine (15mg) for transmission blocking of P. falciparum or 14 days of primaquine (15mg) in G6PD normal volunteers or 8 weeks of low dose primaquine (45mg) in G6PD-deficient volunteers for radical cure of P. vivax
Weight based; first line agent for P.f malaria infection diagnosed at monthly follow ups, administered on days 1-3 in subjects with malaria recurrence
40% Permethrin IDA kit, applied once to the uniforms for volunteers assigned to ITU arm
RCAF treatment facilities
Anlong Veaeng, Oddar Meancheay, Cambodia
The absolute risk reduction based on the proportion of subjects remaining malaria-free at the end of 6 months between the study arms as diagnosed by PCR-corrected malaria microscopy
Time frame: 6 months
Overall rate of sexual stage infections at Months 1 through 6 in each arm based on a combined endpoint of light microscopy and PCR analysis for detection of gametocyte maturity.
Time frame: 6 months
Number of participants with abnormal lab values and/or Adverse Events that are related to the treatments in each arm
Time frame: 6 months
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of asexual and sexual blood stage at 28-day intervals after treatment or prophylaxis up to 180 days
Time frame: 6 months
Comparison of all-species and species-specific malaria incidence density in each arm over 180-day period
Time frame: 6 months
Comparative incidence of malaria detected by RDT versus RT-PCR versus microscopy
Time frame: 6 months
Comparative incidence of G6PD deficiency in the study population as determined by RDT, quantitative, and qualitative tests
Time frame: At the time of enrollment
Estimate of apparent rates of preexisting immunity to malaria based on medical history, days of fever prior to presentation, and preexisting parasitological parameters (gametocytemia, low asexual stage parasitemias)
Time frame: 6 months
Sensitivity and specificity assessment of the currently recommended rapid diagnostic test in Cambodia to detect moderate to severe G6PD deficiency using quantitative G6PD testing as the reference standard
Time frame: At the time of enrollment
Odds ratio for P.v recurrence for each CYP2D6 phenotype
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of cytochrome P450 2D6 genotypes/phenotypes in the population at risk
Time frame: 6 months
Percent reduction in hemoglobin and HTC for each 2D6 haplotype in subjects with available CBC following PQ dosing
Time frame: Day 3 (and day 7 in those volunteers with Hgb or HCT drop of at least 10% from baseline on Day 3)
Percentage of subjects with malaria recurrence for each CYP2D6 phenotype
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.