Until now it has not been investigated whether placement of implants in SS patients is less successful than compared to non-SS patients. The risk factors and the efficacy of dental implants in dry mouth patients are not known because of the lack of scientific evidence. The aim of this study is to investigate changes in marginal peri-implant bone loss and the clinical performance of dental implants in SS patients compared to implants in healthy patients.
Rationale: Until now it has not been investigated whether placement of implants in SS patients is less successful than compared to non-SS patients. The risk factors and the efficacy of dental implants in dry mouth patients are not known because of the lack of scientific evidence. Objective: to investigate changes in marginal peri-implant bone loss and the clinical performance of dental implants in SS patients compared to implants in healthy patients. Study design: A prospective multicenter clinical trial. Study population: N = 120 Intervention: All patients receive Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel implants to replace the missing (pre)molars or to support a full denture in the upper and lower jaw . This study is comprised of four study groups: * 30 human adults affected by SS with the need of replacement of missing premolars or molars in the upper or lower jaw. * 30 healthy human adults with the need of replacement of missing premolars or molars in the upper or lower jaw. * 30 human edentulous adults affected by SS with the need of stabilization of the dentures. * 30 healthy human edentulous adults with the need of stabilization of the dentures. Main study parameters/endpoints: changes in marginal peri-implant bone loss of dental implants between the healthy and SS groups and differences in clinical performance 1.5 years after finalization.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
120
Insertion of Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants to replace missing (pre)molars or to stabilize a denture
VU Medical Center department of Maxillofacial surgery
Amsterdam, Netherlands
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, Netherlands
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, Netherlands
Tandartspraktijk Bocht Oosterdiep
Veendam, Netherlands
Change in marginal peri-implant bone loss of dental implants
changes in marginal peri-implant bone loss of dental implants between the healthy and SS groups and differences in clinical performance 1.5 years after finalization.
Time frame: 1.5 years
Implant survival
The survival rate of the fixture is assessed 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 1.5 years after placement of the definitive restoration. Implant survival is defined as presence of the implant at time of the follow-up examinations.
Time frame: 1.5 years
Overdenture/crown survival
The survival (i.e. fully intact) rate of the denture or crown is assessed 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 1.5 years after placement of the definitive restoration.
Time frame: 1.5 years
Modified Plaque-index and Modified Bleeding-Index
These parameters are evaluated pre-operative, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 1.5 years after placement of the definitive restoration. The adjacent teeth are counted as well in the assessments (dentate groups only).
Time frame: 1.5 years
Probing depth
Probing of the implant and the adjacent teeth (dentate groups only) is performed at three sites, buccodistal, buccomedial, buccomesial. The probing depth is measured 1 month, 6 months, one year and 1.5 years after placement of the definitive restoration.
Time frame: 1.5 years
Width of keratinized epithelium
The width in millimetres of keratinized epithelium is measured pre-operative, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 1.5 years after the definitive restoration has been placed. For this a periodontal probe is used.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Vogellanden Center for Special Care Dentistry/Isala
Zwolle, Netherlands
Time frame: 1.5 years
Patient satisfaction and impact of oral health on the quality of life
\- All patients: OHIP-NL14. Oral Health Impact Profile. An instrument for measuring the impact of oral health on the quality of life. A validated Dutch-language version of the OHIP-14, a questionnaire by means of which the impact of oral health on the quality of life of patients can be determined is completed by every participant at every examination
Time frame: 1.5 years
Denture function and satisfaction
* Edentulous groups: the following validated questionnaires are used for the edentulous groups only (see attachment; Vervoorn et al., 1988): * A. General experience with the denture, including a grade from 1 tot 10 * B. Complaints form with regard to aesthetics and function of the denture * C. Chewing list (which food can be chewed well and which food is difficult to chew). The participant at every time point completes these questionnaires
Time frame: 1.5 years
Disease symptoms (SS groups only)
patients in the SS groups are asked to complete the EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index and the EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSPRI \& ESSDAI; see attachment) questionnaire with regard to disease symptoms
Time frame: 1.5 years