The investigators aim to evaluate the biological and mechanical short- and long-term outcome of IL in partially or completely edentulous patients. Moreover, the investigators aim to detect potential influencing risk factors predicting undesirable prosthetic outcome.
Since its introduction in the late 1990s, immediate implant loading concepts (IL) have become a frequent alternative for delayed implant procedures. IL concepts reduce chair time, the number of surgical interventions and pain, and offer instant comfort to the patient. Its reduced treatment time results in obvious socioeconomic advantages. Although there is at present abundant evidence that supports IL, evaluation of long-term biological and mechanical stability outcomes of large patient populations could allow quality improvement and more accurate patient selection. The Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and the Department of Dentistry of the General Hospital Saint-John Bruges act as one of the pioneers of IL in Belgium, routinely performing the concept since 2001. The investigators aim to evaluate the biological and mechanical short- and long-term outcome of IL in partially or completely edentulous patients. Moreover, the investigators aim to detect potential influencing risk factors predicting undesirable prosthetic outcome.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
150
General Hospital Saint-John Bruges
Bruges, Belgium
implant survival rate
Percentage of people in the study for which implant is still present of the fixture in the oral cavity
Time frame: within 6 months post placement of implants
implant survival rate
Percentage of people in the study for which implant is still present of the fixture in the oral cavity
Time frame: until a maximum of 15 years of follow-up
Infection rate
Percentage of people in the study that develop an infection at the site of the implant in the oral cavity
Time frame: within 6 months post placement of implants
Infection rate
Percentage of people in the study that develop an infection at the site of the implant in the oral cavity
Time frame: until a maximum of 15 years of follow-up
correlation between patient-mediated factors and occurrence of implant instability
correlation between patient-mediated factors (age, gender, comorbidities, etc) and occurrence of implant instability, as clinically evaluated by the treating surgeon
Time frame: within 6 months post placement of implants
correlation between patient-mediated factors and occurrence of implant instability
correlation between patient-mediated factors (age, gender, comorbidities, etc) and occurrence of implant instability, as clinically evaluated by the treating surgeon
Time frame: until a maximum of 15 years of follow-up
correlation between clinical factors and the occurrence of implant instability
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
correlation between clinical factors (surgeon, surgical procedure, etc) as and the occurrence of implant instability, as clinically evaluated by the treating surgeon
Time frame: within 6 months post placement of implants
correlation between clinical factors and the occurrence of implant instability
correlation between clinical factors (surgeon, surgical procedure, etc) as and the occurrence of implant instability, as clinically evaluated by the treating surgeon
Time frame: until a maximum of 15 years of follow-up
correlation between implant characteristics and occurrence of implant instability
correlation between implant characteristics (design/finish/material) and occurrence of implant instability, as clinically evaluated by the treating surgeon
Time frame: within 6 months post placement of implants
correlation between implant characteristics and occurrence of implant instability
correlation between implant characteristics (design/finish/material) and occurrence of implant instability, as clinically evaluated by the treating surgeon
Time frame: until a maximum of 15 years of follow-up