The aim of the prospective randomized study is to investigate whether a intensified diabetic control program leads to better final visual acuity and less frequent diabetic ocular complications in patients with diabetic retinopathy when compared with a normal diabetic treatment.
Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) will be treated with intravitreal ranibizumab injections and the effect of optimal control of internal factors (eg. glycemia, blood pressure etc) on final functional (best corrected visual acuity-CBVA) and morphological (central retinal thickness-CRT) will be investigated. Patients will be randomized into two groups: Group with intensified diabetic control will be follow and investigated monthly at department of diabetology, endocrinology and nutritional medicine (Campus Benjamin Franklin) in Berlin with aim to reach the optimal glycemic control defined as HbA1c \< 6,5%. Further, triglycerides values \< 140 mg/dl and blood pressure \< 140/90 mmHg will be pursued. Second group of patients will be followed by their general practitioner and in the study center only blood samples will be taken quarterly without active medical intervention. BCVA, CRT and the number of required ranibizumab injections will we evaluated and compared between both study groups.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
4
Ranibizumab injections will be given for diabetic macular edema. In the experimental arm insulin injections and antihypertensiva will be applied.
Department of Ophthalmology, Charite, Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 12 Baseline Visit
Measured by the difference in ETDRS letters score between month 12 and baseline according to internal guideline of Charité department of ophthalmology.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Number of Treatments With Ranibizumab up to 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months of Treatment
For the number of treatments at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, an ANOVA without any covariates was planned to be applied at each endpoint 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. As the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus statistical analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12. Results are only shown descriptively. Ranibizumab injections were summed up per study arm as well as cumulative at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline Visit
As the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. Time point 24 months was reached by none of the patients due to trial discontinuation. Results are only shown descriptively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) score is shown as change in ETDRS letters score at the distinct time point compared to baseline. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Macular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to Baseline
As the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12 due to trial discontinuation. Results are only shown descriptively. Macular thickness (study eye) is shown as change in thickness \[µm\] compared to individual baseline value. A reduction in thickness means improvement.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Time to Reach Target HbA1c
Time frame: 24 months
Number of Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation (PRP) Treatments Necessary for Neovascular Complications
Need for PRP is up to the investigator's decision. Assessment was done on every visit. Intended time frame was baseline to 24 months. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12 due to study discontinuation. Unit of measure is any separate investigator's decision to perform panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) for neovascular complications. Each PRP is counted separately.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Number of Participants With Retinal Detachment, Central Retinal Artery Occlusion, or Endophthalmitis and/or Ocular Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment
All ocular adverse events presented from baseline to 24 months will be documented.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment
All adverse events were documented. Causal relationship to study treatment was assessed by the investigators. Intended time frame was baseline to 24 months. None of the patients reached time points beyond 12 months due to study discontinuation.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months