Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Gynaecological Surgery

Overview

The laparoscopic technique is commonly employed for abdominal gynaecological surgery in women. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) may occur in 30% of women undergoing gynaecological surgery. In patients with multiple risk factors for nausea and vomiting, the incidence is up to 80%. PONV has a significant negative effect on patient satisfaction after anesthesia and is one of the most common causes for unexpected hospital admissions in day-surgery. Sugammadex and Neostigmine are both drugs that are used to reverse the effect of muscle relaxation producing drugs that are commonly used during surgery. Neostigmine has been the drug of common use for this purpose, but PONV is reported with its usage. With this research we intend to determine whether the trial drug Sugammadex would reduce the incidence of PONV in high-risk women after undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery when compared to Neostigmine.

More than 1500 laparoscopic abdominal gynaecological surgeries are performed at our Hospital every year and hence there is a need to provide excellent analgesia and minimize side effects from medications to improve patient satisfaction and outcomes. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) may occur in 30% of women undergoing gynaecological surgery. In a patient population with multiple risk factors (e.g. female gender, duration of surgery \> 2 hours, non-smoker, history of PONV or a history of motion sickness), the incidence is up to 80%. PONV has a significant negative effect on patient satisfaction after anesthesia and is one of the most common causes for unexpected hospital admissions in day-surgery. The primary aim of our study is to determine whether Sugammadex would reduce the incidence of self-reported postoperative nausea after surgery in high-risk women 24-hours after undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery, when compared to Neostigmine. The secondary aims are to investigate the effects of Sugammadex on the severity of self-reported PONV at 6-hour; the quality of recovery score at 24-hours; total number of patients with PONV, pain intensity and overall satisfaction score with anaesthesia following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery in high-risk women. This study is intended as a double-blinded, randomised, single-center trial at KK Women's and Children's Hospital. Sugammadex is a selective relaxant-binding agent that provides rapid reversal from neuromuscular blockade induced during general anaesthesia to facilitate surgical procedures. The main advantage of sugammadex is that its action is not dependent on inhibition of acetylcholinesterase when compared to traditional reversal agents such as Neostigmine. Therefore, sugammadex is not associated with the cholinergic side effects like nausea, vomiting and bradycardia. This present study intends to provide a new, effective anaesthetic regimen producing a reduction in side effects from surgery and anaesthesia, with higher patient satisfaction. Sugammadex was identified as the first selective relaxant-binding agent providing rapid reversal from neuromuscular blockade induced during general anaesthesia when used to facilitate surgical procedures (Welliver 2006). The mechanism of Sugammadex differs from that of other commonly used reversal agents, such as neostigmine and edrophonium, which are reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Neostigmine relies on inhibition of acetylcholinesterase, causing autonomic instability and side effect like headache, blurred vision, slowing of the heart rate (bradycardia), and gastrointestial symptoms including anorexia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps and diarrhea. Hence, an anticholinergic drug such as atropine has to be administered concurrently to prevent excessive muscarinic effects such as bradycardia (Gilman 1980). A previous study (Lovstad et al 2001) showed that neostigmine increases the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynaecological surgery compared to a placebo. However, in the current practice of providing neuromuscular blockade for laparoscopic surgery, maintenance of neuromuscular blockade is required to facilitate surgery, thereby making reversal agents necessary to prevent postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade. Knowledge Gap: Without preventative treatment, about 30% of patients undergoing general anaesthesia are likely to suffer postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (Cohen et al, 1994; Apfel et al, 1999). In a patient population with multiple risk factors (e.g. female gender, duration of surgery \> 2 hours, non-smoker, history of PONV or history of motion sickness), the incidence is up to 80%. PONV has a significant negative effect on patient satisfaction after anaesthesia and is one of the most common causes for unexpected hospital admissions after day-surgery. Since at our Hospital more than 1500 laparoscopic gynaecological surgeries are performed every year, this a significant clinical problem. Unplanned hospital admissions due to postoperative nausea and vomiting after a low-risk, day-surgical, gynaecological procedure at our hospital accounted for 29 cases out of a total of 163 cases last year (18%). In fact, the Ministry of Health tracks unplanned hospital admission as a performance indicator. Sugammadex is more expensive when compared to neostigmine, and therefore its use should be limited to the high-risk PONV group, in order to maximize its cost-benefit potential. Sugammadex was first approved for use in the European Union in 2008 and is also approved in Australia, Iceland, New Zealand and Norway. A recently published Cochrane systematic review on Sugammadex (Abrishami et al 2012) examined the efficacy and safety of Sugammadex and the authors concluded that Sugammadex was shown to be more effective than placebo (no medication) or neostigmine in reversing muscle relaxation caused by neuromuscular blockade during surgery and is relatively safe. Inadequate reversal of neuromuscular blockade may lead to breathing problems or hypoxia due to an inability to breathe adequately, potentially leading to prolonged hospitalisation, thereby causing increased healthcare costs. Train-of-four (TOF) monitoring enables the anaesthetist to assess if neuromuscular blockade could be safely reversed. The expert recommendation is to reverse neuromuscular blockade when TOF is at least 2 (0 to 4, 0= dense neuromuscular blockade, 4= minimal neuromuscular blockade). Sugammadex may potentially lead to greater patient safety in anaesthesia and at the same time offer greater patient satisfaction in terms of reducing the side effects of neostigmine like nausea and vomiting. However, there is little evidence about the clinical outcomes after administration of Sugammadex, such as the incidence and severity of PONV after surgery and the quality of recovery and pain intensity in high-risk women following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Our current proposal will compare Sugammadex with neostigmine in women at high-risk of PONV after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. As this study is the first clinical trial targeting the population at high-risk of developing PONV and may change routine clinical practice. If our hypothesis is true, Sugammadex will provide a new anaesthetic regime with better patient safety and efficacy such as reduction in unplanned hospital admissions; reduction in anaesthetic complications such as nausea, vomiting and inadequate reversal of neuromuscular blockade routinely produced during anaesthesia.