The treatment of advanced ovarian cancer is based on the combination of chemotherapy based on platinum salt and surgery whose quality is the major prognostic factor. A meta-analysis of retrospective series had shown that for every 10% increase in the complete cytoreduction rates were increased by 5.5% overall survival time (Markman et al, 2001). Currently, it is recognized that the best chance of survival conferred to patients whose initial surgical residue is zero (Harter et al, 2009). However, even if macroscopically complete surgery and whatever the type of systemic chemotherapy, peritoneal recurrence remains high for more than 75%. To reducing it of recurrence, a therapeutic approach is to administer chemotherapy intraperitoneally. The intraperitoneal chemotherapy consists to administer the drug directly into the peritoneal cavity. Alberts et al, 1996 and Armstrong et al, 2006 compared the efficacy in terms of survival of an intraperitoneal chemotherapy according to this method with a conventional systemic chemotherapy. Alberts reported a significant improvement in the median overall survival. Armstrong shows in addition a decreased risk of recurrence. It must be remembered that: * The establishment of an intra-abdominal catheter does not always ensure complete flow of drugs into the peritoneal cavity (major postoperative adhesions). * There may be problems of catheters becoming blocked and requiring local treatment; these problems can cause abdominal pain whose care is difficult. Thus almost half of patients fail to get all six courses of intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Thus, the investigators propose to estimate the flow of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with IP peritoneal scintigraphy, using a radiotracer (nanocis®). The investigators hypothesize that the movement of colloids in peritoneal cavity is similar to the circulation of chemotherapy within the peritoneal cavity (From Forni et al, 1993, Varia et al, 2003, Young et al, 2003, Dawson et al, 2011). The accumulation of radiotracer will be more correlated with abdominal pain sites described by the patient as well as peritoneal recurrence sites found during monitoring.
Epithelial ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of female cancer and the leading cause of death among gynecological cancers (Alberts et al, 2002). The treatment of advanced ovarian cancer is based on the combination of chemotherapy based on platinum salt and surgery whose quality is the major prognostic factor. A meta-analysis of retrospective series had shown that for every 10% increase in the complete cytoreduction rates were increased by 5.5% overall survival time (Markman et al, 2001). Currently, it is recognized that the best chance of survival conferred to patients whose initial surgical residue is zero (Harter et al, 2009). However, even if macroscopically complete surgery and whatever the type of systemic chemotherapy, peritoneal recurrence remains high for more than 75%. To reducing it of recurrence, a therapeutic approach is to administer chemotherapy intraperitoneally. The intraperitoneal chemotherapy consists to administer the drug directly into the peritoneal cavity at a frequency that is related to systemic chemotherapy (every 3 weeks). Alberts et al, 1996 and Armstrong et al, 2006 compared the efficacy in terms of survival of an intraperitoneal chemotherapy according to this method with a conventional systemic chemotherapy. Alberts reported a significant improvement in the median overall survival (49 vs 41 months). Armstrong shows in addition a decreased risk of recurrence. It must be remembered that: * The establishment of an intra-abdominal catheter does not always ensure complete flow of drugs into the peritoneal cavity (major postoperative adhesions). * There may be problems of catheters becoming blocked and requiring local treatment; these problems can cause abdominal pain whose care is difficult. Thus almost half of patients fail to get all six courses of intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Thus, the investigators propose to estimate the flow of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with IP peritoneal scintigraphy, using a radiotracer (nanocis®). The investigators hypothesize that the movement of colloids in peritoneal cavity is similar to the circulation of chemotherapy within the peritoneal cavity (From Forni et al, 1993, Varia et al, 2003, Young et al, 2003, Dawson et al, 2011). The accumulation of radiotracer will be more correlated with abdominal pain sites described by the patient as well as peritoneal recurrence sites found during monitoring.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Patients will receive an intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined to a radiotracer in order to assess the intraperitoneal distribution of the chemotherapy
Centre Jean Perrin
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Quantification by visual analysis the intensity of fixation of the solvent characterized in the intraperitoneal cavity
The intensity of fixation will be defined as followed: 0: no fixation 1. fixation of low intensity 2. fixation of high intensity
Time frame: During the 6 cycles of chemotherapy, that is during 18 weeks
Note adverse events assessed with CTCAE v4.0
The treatment-related adverse events will be assessed with CTCAE v4.0
Time frame: During the 6 cycles of chemotherapy, that is during 18 weeks
Correlate pain intensity to fixation intensity in the peritoneal cavity
Pain intensity will be measured with EVA scale
Time frame: During the 6 cycles of chemotherapy, that is during 18 weeks
dosimetric study with peritoneal scintigraphy
This study will be realised only for the first three patients included in the trial
Time frame: During the 6 cycles of chemotherapy, that is during 18 weeks
Correlate site of relapse to localisation of labeled intraperitoneal solvent by nanocis in peritoneal cavity
Time frame: During 5 years after chemotherapy
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.