Treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenge. This study will assess the efficacy of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (BVS) (Abbott Vascular) in the treatment of patients suffering from ISR.
Treatment of patients with ISR remains a challenge. Currently both drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) are considered as the strategies of choice in this setting. However, data on the value of BVS in patients with ISR is scarce. BVS are very effective to inhibit neointimal proliferation and they avoid the need of implanting a new permanent metal layer. Accordingly, currently, there is a major interest to elucidate the potential value of BVS in patients with ISR. This prospective Spanish multicenter study will assess the clinical and angiographic outcome of patients with ISR treated with BVS. BVS will be implanted in selected patients (fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria) presenting with either BMS-ISR or DES-ISR. Care will be paid to ensure device optimization. Angiographic follow-up will be obtained at 6-9 months. A centralized angiographic corelab will be used to provide QCA measurements. Clinical follow-up will be also obtained at 1 year and then yearly. Clinical events will be adjudicated by an independent Clinical Event Committee.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
130
Complexo Universitario Hospitalario de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina
Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain
Minimal lumen diameter as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography at late angiographic follow-up
This is a single arm study and results will be analyzed per arm. However, the angiographic and clinical results will be also compared with those obtained in other arms of previous RIBS trials
Time frame: angiographic follow-up at 6-9 months
Combined clinical end-point (cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization)
This is a well-accepted outcome measure of individual clinical end-points. Definition of myocardial infarction is similar to that used in previous RIBS studies.
Time frame: 1 year of clinical follow-up
Acute gain
Change in the minimal lumen diameter from baseline to the final procedural angiogram. Acute angiographic parameter.
Time frame: procedure
Minimal lumen diameter
Acute angiographic parameter
Time frame: procedure
Percent diameter stenosis
Acute angiographic parameter
Time frame: procedure
Restenosis rate
Late angiographic parameter
Time frame: 6-9 months
Percent diameter stenosis
Late angiographic parameter
Time frame: 6-9 months
Late loss
Change in minimal lumen diameter from the final procedure to the follow-up angiogram at 6-9 months. Late angiographic parameter.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander, Cantabria, Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
Granada, Granada, Spain
Complejo Asistencial de León
León, León, Spain
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
...and 9 more locations
Time frame: 6-9 months
Net gain
Is the difference between acute gain and late loss. Late angiographic parameter.
Time frame: 6-9 months
Loss index
Late angiographic parameter
Time frame: 6-9 months
Combined clinical outcome measure (Cardiac death, Myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization)
This is a well-accepted outcome measure of individual clinical end-points. Definition of myocardial infarction is similar to that used in previous RIBS studies.
Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Cardiac death
Individual clinical outcome
Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Total mortality
Individual clinical outcome
Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Myocardial infarction
Individual clinical outcome
Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Target vessel revascularization
Individual clinical outcome
Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Target lesion revascularization
Individual clinical outcome
Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Stent thrombosis
Individual clinical outcome
Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Major bleeding
Individual clinical outcome
Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years