The study is aimed at comparing debridement either with CO2 laser or traditional surgery in patients with infected diabetic foot ulcers. The principal endpoint is bacterial load immediately after treatment.
The present study is designed to assess the antimicrobial effect of a single CO2 laser beam (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy) in the treatment of diabetic infected foot ulcers. CO2 laser debridement will be compared with standard surgical care. The primary efficacy endpoint will be the reduction of bacterial load between pre- and immediately after debridement. Secondary endpoints will be adverse events and pain during treatment. Two bacterial sample with a flocked nylon swab will be collected before and after debridement.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
Single session of CO2 laser debridement
Single session of traditional debridement
Bacterial Load
Percent change in bacterial colonies from baseline.
Time frame: Percent change in bacterial colonies from baseline. Variation from baseline and immediately after the end of procedure.
Pain: Scores of Brief Pain Inventory
Scores of Brief Pain Inventory. Scale ranges: from 0 to 10. 0 = No pain; 10= Pain as bad as you can imagine.
Time frame: During procedure.
Fibrin: Percent of Ulcer Area Covered by Fibrin
Percent change of ulcer area covered by fibrin from baseline to immediately after the end of procedure
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the end of procedure
Granulation: Percent of Ulcer Area Covered by Granulation.
Percent change of ulcer area covered by granulation from baseline to immediately after the end of procedure.
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after procedure
Bleeding: Proportion of Patients With Bleeding Necessitating Haemostasis
proportion of patients with bleeding necessitating haemostasis
Time frame: during procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.