Prospective observational study to IDEntify patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC and ALK and ROS1 translocation and to establish their therapeutic management (IDEALK\&ROS)
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
692
Treatment with crizotinib following routine clinical practice
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Quality of Life Score: ALK Treatment and ROS1 Sub-study Only
ECOG quality of life score is a rating of a participant's disease status, daily living activities and quality of life, where 0: fully active, 1: restricted in physically strenuous activity, 2: ambulatory and capable of self-care but unable to work, 3: capable only of limited self-care , 4: completely disabled; cannot carry on any self-care; totally confined to bed or chair, 5: dead. Higher scores indicated more severe disease, difficulty in performing daily activity and poor quality of life. Number of participants classified according to ECOG quality of life scores were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: At baseline (for ALK treatment sub-study: at the beginning of diagnosis of ALK; for ROS1 treatment sub-study: at the beginning of diagnosis of ROS1 metastatic disease)
Number of Participants Classified According to the Origin of Tumor Sample
Number of participants classified according to the origin of tumor sample (primary tumor or metastasis) were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: At baseline (for ALK incidence sub-study: at the beginning of initial diagnosis of lung cancer; for ROS1 and ALK treatment sub-study: at the beginning of ALK and ROS1 initial diagnosis)
Number of Participants Classified According to Type of Sample Collected for Tumor Analysis
Number of participants classified according to the type of sample collected (biopsy, cell block or cytology) were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: At baseline (for ALK incidence sub-study: at the beginning of initial diagnosis of lung cancer; for ROS1 and ALK treatment sub-study: at the beginning of ALK and ROS1 initial diagnosis)
Number of Participants Classified According to Histological Subtype of Tumor
Number of participants classified according to the histological subtype (adenocarcinoma, squamous, large cell, not otherwise specified \[NOS\], other) were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: At baseline (for ALK incidence sub-study: at the beginning of initial diagnosis of lung cancer; for ROS1 and ALK treatment sub-study: at the beginning of diagnosis of ALK and ROS1 metastatic disease)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hospital Clínico Univ. de Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
Hospital Virgen de los Lirios
Alcoy, Alicante, Spain
Complejo Hospitalario de Jerez
Jerez de la Frontera, Cadiz, Spain
Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander, Cantabria, Spain
Hospital General Mancha Centro
Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad REAL, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, LAS Palmas, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
Hospital Universitario Cruces
Barakaldo, Vizcaia, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Albacete
Albacete, Spain
Hospital Universitario Clinic i Provincial
Barcelona, Spain
...and 22 more locations
Number of Participants Classified According to Stage of Tumor: ALK Treatment Sub-study and ROS1 Treatment Sub-study
Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM): based on tumor size, metastasis to nearby lymph nodes (LN), or distant metastasis. Stages were: stage IIIA (T0N2M0, T1N2M0,T2N3M0, T3N1 or N2M0), stage IIIB (T4 any NM0, any TN3M0), stage IV (any T any NM1), where T0 = early form of tumor, T1 = less than (\<) 2 centimeter (cm), T2 = 2-5 cm, T3 = greater than (\>) 5 cm, T4 = large sized, N0 = not spread to lymph nodes (LN), N1 = spread to 1 to 3 LN, N2 = spread to 4 to 9 LN, N3 = spread \>10 axillary LN, M0 = no metastasis, M1 = metastasis. The number of participants classified according to stages of tumor (Stage IIIA, IIIB and IV) were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: At baseline (for ALK incidence sub-study: at the beginning of initial diagnosis of lung cancer; for ROS1 and ALK treatment sub-study: at the beginning of ALK and ROS1 initial diagnosis of metastatic disease)
Number of Participants Classified According to Molecular Alterations in Tumor: ALK Treatment Sub-Study and ROS1 Treatment Sub-Study
Number of participants classified according to molecular alterations (PD-L1+: programmed death-ligand 1 positive, MET+: mesenchymal epithelial transition factor receptor positive, TP53+: tumor protein 53 positive, AKT: serine/threonine-protein kinase) in tumors were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: At baseline (for ALK treatment sub-study: at the beginning of diagnosis of ALK; for ROS1 treatment sub-study: at the beginning of diagnosis of ROS1 metastatic disease)
Number of Participants Classified According to Location of Metastases: ALK Treatment Sub-Study and ROS1 Treatment Sub-Study
Number of participants classified according to the location of metastases were reported in this outcome measure. One participant may have more than one site of metastases.
Time frame: At baseline (for ALK treatment sub-study: at the beginning of diagnosis of ALK; for ROS1 treatment sub-study: at the beginning of diagnosis of ROS1 metastatic disease)
Number of Participants Categorized According to Number of Treatments Prior to Crizotinib: ALK Treatment Sub-Study and ROS1 Treatment Sub-Study
Number of participants classified according to number of treatments (1 or 2) prior to crizotinib were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: At baseline (for ALK treatment sub-study: after initial diagnosis of ALK metastatic disease; for ROS1 treatment sub-study: after initial diagnosis of ROS1 metastatic disease)
Number of Participants According to Treatment Response: ALK Treatment Sub-Study and ROS1 Treatment Sub-Study
Number of participants with treatment response as complete response (CR): disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 millimeter \[mm\] short axis), partial response (PR): at least 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits, stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), progressive disease (PD): at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From date of inclusion until last date of follow-up (ALK treatment sub-study: maximum of 96.5 months and ROS1 treatment sub-study: maximum of 46.6 months)
Number of Participants Classified According to Survival Data: ALK Treatment Sub-Study and ROS1 Treatment Sub-Study
The number of participants classified as dead or alive were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From date of inclusion until last date of follow-up (ALK treatment sub-study: maximum of 96.5 months and ROS1 treatment sub-study: maximum of 46.6 months)
Percentage of Participants With European Organization For Research And Treatment Of Cancer Quality Of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores: ALK Treatment Sub-study
QLQ-C30: 30 item questionnaire consisted of a global health (GH) score, 5 functional domains, 8 symptom scales and single item about financial difficulties. All items were graded by severity experienced during previous week and used a 4-point-scale (1: not at all, 2: a little, 3: quite a bit, 4: very much). The scores were converted to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scale ranging from 0 - 100. Higher GH and functional domain scores indicated better function and lower scores in symptom scales and single item indicated more severity. Positive changes from baseline indicated improvement and negative changes from baseline indicated worsening for GH and functional domains. Negative changes from baseline indicated improvement and higher levels of functioning and positive changes from baseline indicated worsening for symptom scale and single item. Stable indicated that the symptoms were neither improving nor worsening.
Time frame: Baseline, End (day 28) of Cycles 1 and 3, and end of treatment (up to approximately 15.2 months)
Percentage of Participants With European Organization For Research And Treatment Of Cancer Quality Of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13) Scores: ALK Treatment Sub-study
QLQ-LC13 consisted of 13 questions relating to disease symptoms specific to lung cancer \& treatment side effects typical of treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. It comprised of multi-item scale and single-item scale for symptoms and side effects (coughing, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, chest pain, arm pain, other pain, \& medicine for pain). Response range - 1: Not at all to 4: Very much. The scores were converted to a HRQoL scale ranging from 0 - 100 where, higher scores = greater level of symptoms. Negative changes from baseline indicated improvement and positive changes from baseline indicated worsening. Stable indicated that the symptoms were neither improving nor deteriorating.
Time frame: Baseline, End (day 28) of Cycles 1 and 3, and end of treatment (up to approximately 15.2 months)
Percentage of Participants With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Positive Translocations: ALK Incidence Sub-Study
The percentage of participants with ALK positive translocations were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: At baseline (after initial diagnosis of lung cancer and until end of recruitment of ALK incidence sub study)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS): ALK Treatment Sub-study and ROS1 Treatment Sub-Study
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the period between the first day of treatment and the first day that progressive disease (PD) (at least a 20% increase \[including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm\] in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions) was observed according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria, or death. Participants who have not had an event at the time of the analysis of the study data were censored at the date of the last available follow-up.
Time frame: From first day of treatment until date of progressive disease, death or censored, whichever was the earliest (ALK treatment sub-study: maximum of 96.5 months and ROS1 treatment sub-study: maximum of 46.6 months)
Objective Response Rate (ORR): ALK Treatment Sub-study and ROS1 Treatment Sub-Study
ORR: percentage of participants who achieved CR : disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size(\<10 mm short axis), or PR : at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. Additionally, the participants with SD : neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. The participants were evaluated in accordance with RECIST criteria.
Time frame: From first day of treatment until date of CR, PR or SD (ALK treatment sub-study: maximum of 96.5 months and ROS1 treatment sub-study: maximum of 46.6 months)
Duration of Response (DOR): ALK Treatment Sub-study and ROS1 Sub-Study
Duration of response (DOR) in participants with PR or CR was defined as the interval from the date the best response was documented to the first date that progressive disease (at least a 20% increase \[including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm\] in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions) was observed.
Time frame: From the date the best response was documented until the date of progressive disease (ALK treatment sub-study: maximum of 96.5 months and ROS1 treatment sub-study: maximum of 46.6 months)
Overall Survival (OS): ALK Treatment Sub-study and ROS1 Treatment Sub-Study
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the period from the first day of treatment until death or censored up to the last date on which it was known that the participant was alive.
Time frame: From first day of treatment until date of death or censored, whichever was earliest (ALK treatment sub-study: maximum of 96.5 months and ROS1 treatment sub-study: maximum of 46.6 months)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events According to Seriousness: ALK Treatment Sub-study and ROS1 Treatment Sub-Study
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life-threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; constituted a congenital anomaly/birth defect; was important medical event; required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. The number of participants with non-SAEs and SAEs were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From start of study treatment until end of follow-up (ALK treatment sub-study: maximum of 96.5 months and ROS1 treatment sub-study: maximum of 46.6 months)