Fully Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (BVS) have been introduced with the objective to preserve native vessel geometry, allow for adaptive vessel remodeling with late lumen gain, restore physiological vasomotion, and avoid late adverse events including restenosis and scaffold thrombosis. Although randomized clinical trials in low risk patients to date suggest non-inferiority in terms of safety and efficacy compared with metallic DES, several reports have raised concerns regarding the scaffold thrombosis highlighting the importance of technical considerations regarding lesion preparation and scaffold expansion. OCT offers the opportunity to plan the procedure and optimize the implantation of BVS. The hypothesis of the present study is that a strategy of OCT-guided PCI using BVS is superior to angiography-guided PCI (e.g. by selecting scaffold dimension on the basis of a pre-procedural OCT and applying corrective measures in case of suboptimal treatment result as indicated by OCT).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
38
Patients assigned to the OCT-guided PCI strategy will undergo OCT prior to PCI to determine vessel and lesion dimensions and treatment strategy. OCT will be repeated at the end of the procedure and corrective PCI will aim to optimize the PCI result according to pre-specified criteria in terms of minimal lumen area, scaffold expansion, apposition, residual dissections or intra-scaffold thrombus formation
Patients assigned to the OCT-guided PCI strategy will only undergo OCT after PCI to determine vessel and lesion dimensions and treatment strategy.
Inselspital Bern
Bern, Switzerland
Minimal in-scaffold lumen area (mm2) as assessed by OCT
The lumen area is assessed by OCT
Time frame: 6 months
Number of adverse events
Adverse events are defined as scaffold underexpansions, significant strut malappositions or uncovered struts, expansion asymmetries, any intrascaffold tissue, edge dissections, or restenoses (as assessed by OCT)
Time frame: 6 months
OCT imaging endpoints
Scaffold underexpansion, significant strut malapposition or uncovered struts, expansion asymmetry, any intrascaffold tissue, edge dissection, or restenosis. (as assessed by OCT)
Time frame: 6 months
Additional OCT imaging endpoints
* Significant malapposed scaffold struts, % * Malapposed scaffold struts, % * Uncovered scaffold struts, % * Incomplete scaffold apposition area, mm2 * Incomplete scaffold apposition distance, mm * Neointimal thickness, µm * Neointimal area, mm2 * Volume obstruction, %
Time frame: 6 months
OCT imaging endpoints
* Minimal in-scaffold lumen area, mm * Scaffold expansion, % * No of patients with scaffold expansion \<80% * % lesions with significant malapposition * % malapposed struts
Time frame: end of procedure
angiographic endpoints
* acute lumen gain * in-scaffold minimal lumen diameter * in-segment minimal lumen diameter * in-scaffold % diameter stenosis * in-segment % diameter stenosis
Time frame: end of procedure
angiographic endpoints
* In-scaffold late lumen loss, mm * In-segment late lumen loss, mm * In-scaffold % diameter stenosis * In-segment % diameter stenosis * Binary restenosis, % * Percent diameter stenosis, %
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.