The purpose of this study is to increase use and availability, as well as assess the feasibility of the ReliefLink (RL) application for use in conjunction with standard care to promote psychological health and prevent suicidal behavior.
The aims of this study of ReliefLink application are to determine the utility of ReliefLink self-reports of suicidal ideation, negative emotions, loneliness, subjective well-being, flourishing, mental toughness, positive emotions, learned optimism, resilience, and post-traumatic growth. Additional aims are to evaluate the impact of ReliefLink on perceived access to/usage of care and resources and to explore participant acceptance of ReliefLink as a technological support for standard treatment through human systems engineering of treatment plan adherence and user interview.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
13
Participants will complete daily mood tracking and completion of a minimum of one stress management activity per day. Relaxation exercises to choose from on the current version of RL are audio files (i.e., no visuals), and consist of: Guided Meditation, Energizing Breath, Guided Visualization for Relaxation, Progressive Relaxation, Mindfulness Meditation Body Scan, and Mindfulness of Breathing.
Grady Health System
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Change in scores on 6 item Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener (C-SSRS)
A comprehensive, semi-structured interview measure that uniquely measures the full spectrum of suicidality including passive and active suicidal ideation, suicidal intent as well as suicidal behaviors. It rates an individual's degree of suicidal ideation on a scale, ranging from "wish to be dead" to "active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent." A higher number of "yes" responses indicated an increased degree of suicidal ideation.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months
Change in scores on 20-item Positive-Negative Affect Scale (PANAS)
Consists of 10 positively and 10 negatively valanced word items. Items are rated by the participant for the extent they are feeling this "right now" on a scale of 1- slightly or not at all through 5- extremely. Total scores can range from 10-50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive effect and lower scores having negative effect.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months
Change in scores on 20-item R-UCLA Loneliness Scale
A 20-item scale designed to measure one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. Participants rate each item on a scale from 1 (Never) to 4 (Often). A higher score indicates an increased degree of loneliness.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months
Change in scores on 14-item Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF)
Consists of 14 items and measures the degree of emotional well-being as defined in terms of positive affect/satisfaction with life; social well-being, social acceptance, social actualization, social contribution, social coherence social integration, psychological well-being, personal growth, positive relations with others, purpose in life and self-acceptance. Choices for these items vary between 1 to 7. Individuals who exhibit low levels (i.e., 'never' or 'once or twice' during the past month) on at least one measure of hedonic well-being and low levels on at least six measures of positive functioning are diagnosed with languishing mental health.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Change in scores on 12-item Flourishing Scale (FS)
A measure of the participant's self-perceived success in relationships, self-esteem, purpose, and optimism. Items are rated on a seven point rating scale from 1 Strongly disagree to 7 Strongly agree. The scale provides a single psychological well-being score. A lower score indicates a decreased degree of well-being.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months
Change in scores on 8-item Grit-S scale
Measures the individual's tendency to sustain interest in and effort toward very long-term goals. Eight items are assessed using a Likert-like scale (1 = Not like me at all, 5 = Very much like me). There are two sub-scales: Perseverance of Effort and Consistency of Interests. A lower score indicates a decreased decreased levels of perseverance and passion for long-term goals.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months
Change in scores on 10-item Life Orientation Test - Revised
Measures positive and negative expectancies about future events. It consists of 20 statements referring to negative expectancies and 10 statements referring to positive expectancies. Participants answer on a 5-point scale (5 = I agree a lot, 1 = I DISagree a lot). A lower score indicates a decreased degree of life orientation.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months
Change in scores on 25-item Connor Davidson Resilience Inventory
Measures resilience. Range of scores (0-100). A score of 0 is suggestive of no resilience, a score of 100 is suggestive of high level of resilience.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months
Change in scores on 21-item Posttraumatic Growth Inventory
Self-reported measure of post-traumatic growth on a scale of 0 (Did not experience change as a result of their crisis) to 5 (experienced to a very great degree as a result of their crisis). A lower score indicates a decreased degree of posttraumatic growth.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months
11-item Effectiveness of Obtaining Resources scale (EOR)
Calculates the mean of the effectiveness scores for obtaining resources from 11 different types of community resources including mental health treatment, church or clergy, health care, legal services, police, or social services.
Time frame: 6 Months
Number of participants experiencing hospitalizations
Number of hospitalizations self-reported by participants during semi-structured interview. No or infrequent hospitalizations would indicate successful support for the participant via the RL app.
Time frame: 6 Months
Number of participants experiencing self-injury events
Number of self-injury events reported during semi-structured interview. No or infrequent self-injury events would indicate successful support for the participant via the RL app.
Time frame: 6 Months
Number of participant reported barriers to care and resources
The number of participant reported barriers to care and resources will be gathered through mobile phone internal usage data coded and a semi-structured interview. Acceptance of ReliefLink as a treatment resource would be suggested if there aren't significant reported barriers.
Time frame: 16 Weeks
Participant adherence to assigned coping skills activities
The frequency of Participant adherence to assigned coping skills activities will be gathered through mobile phone internal usage data coded and a semi-structured interview. Acceptance of ReliefLink as a treatment resource would be suggested if there was significant participant adherence.
Time frame: 16 Weeks
Participant adherence to daily mood tracking
The degree of Participant adherence to daily mood tracking will be gathered through mobile phone internal usage data coded and a semi-structured interview. Acceptance of ReliefLink as a treatment resource would be suggested if there is significant adherence to mood tracking.
Time frame: 16 Weeks
Participant usage of resource location functions
The frequency of Participant usage of resource location functions will be gathered through mobile phone internal usage data coded and a semi-structured interview. Acceptance of ReliefLink as a treatment resource would be suggested if is significant participant usage.
Time frame: 16 Weeks
Participant positive feedback
Participant positive feedback will be gathered through a semi-structured interview. Acceptance of ReliefLink as a treatment resource would be suggested if there is positive participant feedback received.
Time frame: 16 Weeks