This study will compare a newborn heart rate sensor (HeartLight) that is integrated into a hat with other common forms of heart rate monitoring such as electrocardiography (ECG), stethoscope and pulse oximetry (PO) in newborn babies. This will help to evaluate the new heart rate sensor's reliability and accuracy.
Up to 10% of newborns require some form of resuscitation at birth. Heart rate (HR) is the most sensitive indicator of resuscitation efficacy. HR is most commonly estimated using a stethoscope. However, in simulation studies it has been shown that newborn healthcare providers estimate HR incorrectly in up to 1/3 of cases. Common techniques for monitoring heart rate such as electrocardiography (ECG) and pulse oximetry (PO) were not developed for resuscitation at birth. ECG, an established and accurate method of monitoring HR, is rarely used in the delivery room for a number of reasons including difficulty ensuring adhesion to the skin (the baby is wet/covered in vernix) and skin damage in premature babies caused by stripping of the electrodes. Current ECG systems also require 3 electrodes to be positioned which can delay resuscitation further. The usual site for transmission PO is the foot or hand. However, in newborn babies, and particularly those requiring resuscitation when the HR is low, blood flow is reduced so physiological mechanisms preserve brain and heart blood flow at the expense of other less important organs and limbs. As a consequence of this and the choice of wavelengths, it can be more difficult to obtain a reliable HR from POs on the limbs, and they typically obtain an HR after 1-2 minutes. In the delivery room, ECG and PO systems have a requirement for cables to connect to the main monitors. These can get in the way and it is now recommended for many babies to delay cutting the umbilical cord (to ensure more blood enters the baby from the placenta) which often requires the baby to be resuscitated very close to the mother and even between their legs. The HeartLight system is a wireless optical sensor within a custom newborn hat to allow quick and accurate HR monitoring. It will be compared to ECG, PO and electronic stethoscope to determine the accuracy and reliability. The trial has 4 phases; Phase 1 evaluates the thermal properties of the hat, Phase 2 evaluates the accuracy and reliability of the HeartLight sensor on babies within the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit environment, Phase 3 evaluates the HeartLight sensor in newborn babies born by cesarean section and Phase 4 evaluates the performance of the HeartLight sensor in babies of all gestations requiring resuscitation and stabilisation at birth. The investigators anticipate the HeartLight sensor and hat will allow swift and effective deployment, reduce delays in resuscitation (due to using a stethoscope) and improve HR accuracy (as a result of avoiding errors in the usual manual mental calculations made in the stressful environment of the delivery room) when it is needed most. However, an additional benefit is that it will not require significant modification to the existing care pathway or resuscitation protocols, and therefore a potential barrier to clinical uptake is removed.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
184
HeartLight hat will be worn for up to 1 hour.
The HeartLight hat with in-built sensor will be worn.
Electronic stethoscope will be used to estimate heart rate with HeartLight sensor/hat
University of Nottingham NHS Trust
Nottingham, United Kingdom
Heart Rate acquisition time in the first minute of life
Time to acquire heart rate from new optical hat sensor from birth should be within 1 minute of birth.
Time frame: 1 hour
Reliability of heart rate generated by HeartLight device
Assess the reliability of the new heart rate device
Time frame: 1 hour
Accuracy of heart rate generated by HeartLight device
Assess the accuracy of the new heart rate device
Time frame: 1 hour
Feedback on acceptability of hat and device
Feedback will be recorded via a questionnaire from both healthcare professionals and mothers.
Time frame: 1 hour
Thermal imaging to determine heat loss whilst wearing hat
Participants will be thermal imaged whilst wearing the hat to determine heat loss.
Time frame: 1 hour
Thermal imaging to determine heat loss during stabilisation and/or resuscitation
Participants will be thermal imaged during stabilisation and/or resuscitation whilst wearing the hat to determine heat loss.
Time frame: 1 hour
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
HeartLight sensor/hat will be used with ECG/Pulse oximetry/electronic stethoscope
Questionnaire
Questionnaire