Giant cell arteritis (GCA or temporal arteritis or cranial arteritis) or Horton disease is a vasculitis that occurs in older adults, affecting vessels of medium and large caliber. The diagnosis of GCA is a challenge for general practitioners and specialists. Since 1970, it is based on a combination of clinical, biological and histological signs. Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) was the reference method until recently. However, TAB has many drawbacks. Therefore, researches of the past 20 years have been intended to develop alternative diagnostic methods. This was notably the case of the color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) since the description by Wolfgang Schmidt of the halo sign. Although European and British recommendations put CDU as second line method, many authors suggest the possibility to do without TAB in many cases. In addition, many practitioners believe that it is not "ethical" to use an invasive unprofitable procedure like TAB, and have already been using CDU in their routine practice. However, no diagnostic algorithm validating this approach in a prospective series has been published to date. Therefore, the present study aim at validating a diagnostic algorithm of giant cell arteritis using color Doppler imaging of temporal arteries and cervicocephalic axes as first screening method.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
165
Screening with color Doppler ultrasound followed by TAB in case of CDU negative
Centre Hospitalier d'Angoulême
Angoulême, France
Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis
La Rochelle, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes
Nantes, France
Centre Hospitalier de Niort
Niort, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers
Poitiers, France
Centre Hospitalier de Rochefort
Rochefort, France
Number of CDU False-positive Patients
patients with an alternative diagnosis within 2 years of follow-up among patients considered with giant cell arteritis (GCA) on a clinico-biological suspicion + Doppler "positive."
Time frame: after 2 years of follow-up
Rate of "Temporal Artery Biopsy Positive" Among "Negative or Doubtful CDU "
Number of temporal artery biopsy (TAB) positive patients among patients with negative or doubtful CDU
Time frame: within 1 month (during diagnostic algorithm)
Number of Patients With a Persistent Halo at Second CDU Examination
Describe S3/S4 Halo changes, and study correlation between persistence and poorer clinical response
Time frame: after 2 years of follow-up
Number of Correctly Interpreted TAB
Reproducibility of TAB interpretation
Time frame: 1 month (after second blind reading of histological specimen and doppler imaging)
Number of Correctly Interpreted CDU
Reproducibility of CDU interpretation
Time frame: 1 month (after second blind reading of histological specimen and doppler imaging)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.