The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of multiple doses of Gemcabene in patients with HoFH on stable, lipid-lowering therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
8
300 mg tablet orally once daily for four weeks followed by 600 mg tablet orally once daily for four weeks followed by 900 mg tablet orally once daily for four weeks.
Westside Medical Associates of Los Angeles
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Robarts Research Institute
London, Ontario, Canada
Ecogene-21
Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Day 28
Time frame: Baseline, day 28
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Day 56
Time frame: Baseline, day 56
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Day 84
Time frame: Baseline, day 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting LDL-C
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-HDL-C
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-HDL-C
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol (TC)
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol (TC)
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG)
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG)
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting HDL-C
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Wolfson Medical Center Internal Medicine Dept.
Holon, Israel
Center for Research, Prevention and Treatment of Atherosclerosis - Cardiology Department of Medicine Kiryat Hadassah
Jerusalem, Israel
Ziv Medical Center Internal Medicine Department
Safed, Israel
Change From Baseline in Fasting HDL-C
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting VLDL-C
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting VLDL-C
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting LDL-C as Per Receptor Mutation Status
Receptor mutation status was categorized as LDLr status and EAS clinical diagnosis of HoFH which was reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting LDL-C as Per Receptor Mutation Status
Receptor mutation status was categorized as LDLr status and EAS clinical diagnosis of HoFH which was reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-HDL-C as Per Receptor Mutation Status
Receptor mutation status was categorized as LDLr status and EAS clinical diagnosis of HoFH which was reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-HDL-C as Per Receptor Mutation Status
Receptor mutation status was categorized as LDLr status and EAS clinical diagnosis of HoFH which was reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting VLDL-C as Per Receptor Mutation Status
Receptor mutation status was categorized as LDLr status and EAS clinical diagnosis of HoFH which was reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting VLDL-C as Per Receptor Mutation Status
Receptor mutation status was categorized as LDLr status and EAS clinical diagnosis of HoFH which was reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting HDL-C as Per Receptor Mutation Status
Receptor mutation status was categorized as LDLr status and EAS clinical diagnosis of HoFH which was reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting HDL-C as Per Receptor Mutation Status
Receptor mutation status was categorized as LDLr status and EAS clinical diagnosis of HoFH which was reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting TC as Per Receptor Mutation Status
Receptor mutation status was categorized as LDLr status and EAS clinical diagnosis of HoFH which was reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting TC as Per Receptor Mutation Status
Receptor mutation status was categorized as LDLr status and EAS clinical diagnosis of HoFH which was reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG as Per Receptor Mutation Status
Receptor mutation status was categorized as LDLr status and EAS clinical diagnosis of HoFH which was reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting TG as Per Receptor Mutation Status
Receptor mutation status was categorized as LDLr status and EAS clinical diagnosis of HoFH which was reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Number of Participants Achieving LDL-C Reduction of ≥15%
Time frame: Days 28, 56 and 84
Number of Participants Achieving LDL-C Reduction of ≥20%
Time frame: Days 28, 56 and 84
Number of Participants Achieving LDL-C Reduction of ≥25%
Time frame: Days 28, 56 and 84
Number of Participants Achieving LDL-C Reduction of ≥30%
Time frame: Days 28, 56 and 84
Number of Participants Achieving an LDL-C Value <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L)
Time frame: Days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fibrinogen
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fibrinogen
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipoprotein(a)
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipoprotein(a)
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein B
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein B
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein A-I
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein A-I
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein A-II
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein A-II
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein C-II
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein C-II
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein C-III
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein C-III
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein E
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84
Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein E
Time frame: Baseline, days 28, 56 and 84