The purpose of this interventional study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the NLP PTSD protocol in the event of PPPTSD. The study's main hypothesis is that the implementation of the NLP protocol will be effective and result in reduction of the overall PTSD level.
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is considered to be a major Public Health disorder in the Western world with 8% prevalence. When including partial/Sub-clinic PTSD, prevalence rises dramatically. Studies examining the common intervention methods indicate certain clinical effectiveness although none presents sweeping efficiency. Therefore, this syndrome is still a significant clinical problem in Public Health. This study focuses on women population who have experienced trauma in childbirth. Such women experience full post traumatic symptoms (Full PTSD) or Partial/Subclinical PTSD. This syndrome is defined in professional literature as PPPTSD (Post-Partum Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). While childbirth is a healthy part of the cycle of life, birth itself is an event that may involve a risk to the mother and child life. PPPTSD prevalence ranges between 1%-6% and is expressed in at least two of the criteria listed in the DSM. 8.3%-28% of women suffer from partial PPPTSD. Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) is a "one-on-one" intervention method, connecting Neurological processes (N), Linguistic (L) and learned behaviors (P), in order to allow conceptual/perceptual, mental and behavioral changes. Even though NLP is used since the 1970's and field testimonies report its effectiveness, there are only few studies regarding its effectiveness in the field of PTSD. This study's main objective is to examine the effectiveness of the NLP PTSD protocol. The study population will include approx 30 women, up to 2 years after birth, with PPPTSD. The women will be treated in 5 individual sessions implementing the NLP PTSD protocol.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
NLP techniques, such as VKD, visual/auditory/kinesthetic swishes, modified especially for PTSD, will be implemented one-on-one with each woman in this arm.
Mental Health Clinic
Rishon Le'Zion, Israel
PTSD (PCL-C) - PTSD checklist - measures the change in the overall level of PTSD
A Self-report questionnaire diagnoses the severity of PTSD (PCL-C), conducted before and after the intervention, enables to examine the overall level of PTSD (PTSD volume). Developed by Weathers et al, 1993, based on criteria appearing in DSM- V, it includes 20 questions, with each item testing the presence and the severity of one of the symptoms of PTSD during the passing month. Answers are based on the Leickert scale with 5 degrees ranging from 0 ("never") to 4 ("very much"). Overall measurement ranges from 0 to 80 (PTS - Post Traumatic Symptoms). Cut mark for the estimation of PTSD \>= 44.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
PTSD (PCL-C) - PTSD checklist - measures also the change in the levels of PTSD symptoms: intrusion/re-experiencing, avoidance, arousal and negative alterations in cognitions and mood
A Self-report questionnaire diagnoses the severity of PTSD (PCL-C), conducted before and after the intervention, enables to examine also the levels of PTSD symptoms: intrusion/re-experiencing avoidance, arousal and negative alterations in cognitions and mood. Developed by Weathers et al, 1993, based on criteria appearing in DSM- V, it includes 20 questions, with each item testing the presence and the severity of one of the symptoms of PTSD during the passing month. Questions are presented in four groups, which express the four main symptom clusters in PTSD: intrusion/re-experiencing (items 1-5) (criteria B), avoidance (items 6-7) (criteria C), negative alterations in cognitions and mood (items 8-14) (criteria D), and hyper-arousal (items 15-20) (criteria E).
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Functioning Questionnaire - measures the change in overall subjects' Functioning Level
This questionnaire, developed by Gelkopf et al 2011, will be conducted before and after the intervention.The questionnaire evaluates 6 functioning aspects in the passing month: occupation, studies, parenting, relationship with the spouse, being part of the community, friendship and intimacy. The answers are based on the Leickert scale with 5 degrees ranging from 0 ("very bad") to 4 ("very good"). The internal consistency is α = 0.86 (range 0-4, SD=0.79, M=3.20).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year1
Post Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) - measures the change in the overall level of PTG
This questionnaire, developed by Tedeschi \& Calhoun, 1996, will be conducted before and after the intervention. It includes 22 items divided to 5 sub-scales: connection with others, new opportunites, personal strength, spiritual change and life appreciation. The subjects are asked to rate their answer concerning the amount of change they experienced in their life due to the traumatic event. The answers are based on the Leickert scale with 5 degrees ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"). The internal consistency is α = 0.96.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.