Primary objective: 1. To evaluate the safety of TWB-103 in split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds (DSW) for Phase I in terms of Incidence of treatment-related AEs and SAEs (including infections and bleeding) 2. To evaluate the efficacy for Phase I+II of TWB-103 in split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds (DSW) in terms of The healing time from DSW creation to 100% re-epithelialization Secondary objective: 1. To evaluate the efficacy of TWB-103 in split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds (DSW) in secondary efficacy endpoints 2. To evaluate the safety of TWB-103 in split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds (DSW) in secondary safety endpoints
The study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TWB-103 in adult subjects with split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds (DSW). In Phase I proportion, eligible subjects were recruited sequentially with one week staggering of treatment. Eligible subjects were randomized into TWB-103 or Placebo groups in a 1:1 ratio. Phase I was planned to recruit 3 evaluable subjects each in TWB-103 and Placebo groups. Evaluable subjects in Phase I were (1) he/she who received at least one dose and had follow-up evaluation at least 14 days after the first dose or (2) he/she who received at least one dose and had early withdrawn due to safety reasons before Day 28. When all of those 6 evaluable subjects completed the planned treatment period (14 days or till first 100% re-epithelialization, which came first), the recruitment was temporarily stopped for 14 days for safety observation. The safety data before and on Day 28 Visit were reviewed by the sponsor and the principal investigator. If no safety issue was decided, the study would enter Phase II portion and eligible subjects would be randomized into a 1:1 ratio into one of the TWB-103 and Placebo groups. The dosing regimen designed in Phase II portion was the same as it was designed in Phase I portion. Subjects were instructed to attend scheduled visits at Screening, Day 0 (treatment start the day), Day 3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day 14 (end of treatment). All subjects were scheduled to attend a follow-up visit on Day 28 to evaluate the status of the target wound and then enter a 360-day follow-up phase. During the 360-day follow-up, four follow-up visits were scheduled at 90±14 days, 180±14 days, 270±14 days, and 360±14 days following the subject's Day 28 visit (if no Day 42 visit) or Day 42 visit.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
48
Each subject received TWB-103+Tegaderm for up to 10 days or to the day of 100% re-epithelialization, whichever comes first, followed by Tegaderm alone application from Day 10 to 14 if failing to achieve 100% re-epithelialization by Day 10.
Each subject received Placebo+Tegaderm for up to 10 days or to the day of 100% re-epithelialization, whichever comes first, followed by Tegaderm alone application from Day 10 to 14 if failing to achieve 100% re-epithelialization by Day 10.
Nippon Medical School
Tokyo, Japan
Tokyo Medical University
Tokyo, Japan
Tri-Service General Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
Number of Participants With Treatment-related AEs and SAEs (Including Infections and Bleeding)
The number of participants with treatment-related AEs and SAEs (including infections and bleeding) will be observed for the 7 patients in Phase I
Time frame: Day 0~Day 28
The Healing Time From DSW Creation to the First 100% Re-epithelialization With Confirmation for at Least 10 Days Apart Assessed by the Investigator
The healing time from DSW creation to the first 100% re-epithelialization with confirmation for at least 10 days apart assessed by the investigator for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 42 or earlier
Number of Participants Reached Confirmed Healing Within 28 Days.
The number of participants in Phase I and II reached confirmed healing by the investigator within 28 days.
Time frame: Days 42 or earlier
The Healing Time From DSW Creation to the First 100% Re-epithelialization With Confirmation for at Least 10 Days Apart, Assessed by the First Additional Evaluator
The healing time from DSW creation to the first 100% re-epithelialization with confirmation for at least 10 days apart assessed by the investigator for all patients in Phase I and II. The first additional evaluator judged the healing status by looking at the photos of DSW.
Time frame: Days 42 or earlier
Number of Participants With Complete Wound Closure at Day 7, 10 and 14 After DSW Creation.
Complete wound closure is defined as skin 100% re-epithelialization without drainage or dressing requirements. This endpoint will be in all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Day 7, 10 and 14
The Healing Percentage of Wounds (Ratio of Healing Area and Original Area) at Days 7, 10 and 14 After DSW Creation
The healing percentage of wounds will be calculated based on the healing area measured on Day 7, 10 and 14, comparing to the original area measured on Day 0 for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Day 7, 10 and 14
The Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire Score
All patients in Phase I and II will evaluate the pain based on Short-form McGill pain questionnaire at each visit. The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal line, usually, 10 cm (= 100 mm) in length, scored from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme). On this scale, a higher score in VAS indicates the worse pain.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42, Day 90/180/270/360 from Day 28 or 42
Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs
The number of participants with AEs and SAEs will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Screening~ Day 360 from Day 28 or 42
Changes in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment physical examination will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment vital signs-pulse rate will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment vital signs-body temperature will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment vital signs-systolic blood pressure will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment vital signs-diastolic blood pressure will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-white blood cells will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-neutrophils will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-hemoglobin will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-hematocrit will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-platelets will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-red blood cells will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-aspartate aminotransferase will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-alanine aminotransferase will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-serum creatinine will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-blood urea nitrogen will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-albumin will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl transferase will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to Baseline
Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-alkaline phosphatase will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42
Number of Participants With Treatment-related AEs and SAEs (Including Infections and Bleeding)
The number of participants with treatment-related AEs and SAEs (including infections and bleeding) will be observed for all patients in Phase I and II
Time frame: Screening~ Day 360 from Day 28 or 42
The Number of Censored Subjects Assessed by the Investigator and the First Additional Evaluator
The number of censored subjects in Phase I and II assessed by the investigator and the first additional evaluator. The first additional evaluator judged the healing status by looking at the photos of DSW. If the 100% re-epithelialization was not observed by Day 28 visit, the healing time was censored on the day of the last visit up to Day 28 visit. If the 100% re-epithelialization was observed by Day 28 visit but no confirmation was made, the healing time was censored on day of the last visit up to Day 28 visit.
Time frame: Days 42 or earlier
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.