Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is the leading reason for ICU admission in immunocompromised patients. Usual oxygen therapy involves administering low-to-medium oxygen flows through a nasal cannula or mask \[with or without a bag and with or without the Venturi system\] to achieve SpO2≥95%. Oxygen therapy may be combined with non-invasive ventilation \[NIV\] providing both end-expiratory positive pressure and pressure support. However, in a recent trial by our group, non-invasive ventialtion \[NIV\] was not superior over oxygen without NIV. High-flow nasal oxygen \[HFNO\] therapy is a focus of growing attention as an alternative to standard oxygen therapy. By providing warmed and humidified gas, HFNO allows the delivery of higher flow rates \[of up to 60 L/min\] via nasal cannula devices, with Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) values of nearly 100%. Physiological benefits of HFNO consist of higher and constant FiO2 values, decreased work of breathing, nasopharyngeal washout leading to improved breathing-effort efficiency, and higher positive airway pressures associated with better lung recruitment. Clinical consequences of these physiological benefits include alleviation of dyspnoea and discomfort, decreases in tachypnoea and signs of respiratory distress, a diminished need for intubation in patients with severe hypoxemia, and decreased mortality in unselected patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure However, although preliminary data establish the feasibility and safety of this technique, HFNO has never been properly evaluated in immunocompromised patients. Thus, this project aims at demonstrating that HFNO is superior to low/medium-flow (standard) oxygen, minimising day-28 mortality
After discussion at the investigator meeting and based on comments from the Data and Safety Monitoring Board on May 12, 2016, the DSMB has highlighted the need of the interim analysis (already planned) as benefits from high flow oxygen may be observed after 400 inclusions. Update on June 16, 2017: The number of patients enrolled is 488 and the inclusion rate is increasing steadily. The interim analysis has been performed as scheduled and the DSMB decided that nothing should be changed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
776
Devices used to treat spontaneously ventilating patients in the ICU who require supplemental oxygen. They deliver either * low-flow oxygen \[including nasal cannula, Ventimask® without Venturi effect, and non-rebreather mask\] * or medium-flow oxygen \[Venturi masks and medium-flow facemasks\]
The intervention is the use of a device that allows to deliver high flow humidified and warmed oxygen. The device used is the Optiflow™ (Fisher\&Paykel, Courtaboeuf, France).
Medical ICU
Paris, France
All-cause day-28 mortality
Time frame: 28 days
Intubation or reintubation rate
proportion of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation
Time frame: days 3 and 28
patient comfort
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score
Time frame: 28 days
Intensity of dyspnoea
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score
Time frame: days 1-3
Perceived Exertion
Borg scale
Time frame: days 1-3
Respiratory rate
Time frame: days 1-3
Oxygenation
based on continuous saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2) monitoring, lowest SpO2 from D1 to D3 and PaO2/FiO2 on D1, D2, and D3
Time frame: days 1-3
ICU length of stay
Time frame: 28 days
Incidence of ICU-acquired infections
Time frame: 28 days
Time to clear pulmonary infiltrates
Murray score
Time frame: 28 days
Oxygen-free and ventilation-free survivals
Time frame: day 28
Re-intubation rate
Time frame: day 28
Lowest median SpO2 during intubation
for patients who were intubated during the study period
Time frame: days 1-3
Repartition of acute mild/moderate/severe respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) stages after intubation or reintubation as defined by the Berlin definition
Time frame: day 28
Hypoxemic cardiac arrests
After discussion at the investigator meeting and based on comments from the Data and Safety Monitoring Board on May 12, 2016, all hypoxemic cardiac arrests will be considered as suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction
Time frame: day 28
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.