The mail goal of this study is to establish superiority in efficacy of Acellbia® applied in a dose of 600 mg (Day 1 and Day 15) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active RA seropositive previously untreated with biological therapy, compared to standard therapy with methotrexate.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
159
Acellbia is rituximab biosimilar, monoclonal antibody which binds CD20.
Placebo solution will look identical to the Acellbia solution.
Percentage of patients who developed ACR20 response on 24 week of therapy
The proportion of patients achieving at least a 20% improvement in ACR criteria at 24 weeks of therapy.
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of patients who developed ACR50 and ACR70 response on 24 week of therapy
The proportion of patients achieving at least 50% and 70% improvement in ACR criteria at 24 weeks of therapy.
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of patients who developed ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response on 16 week of therapy
The proportion of patients achieving at least 20%, 50% and 70% improvement in ACR criteria after 16 weeks of therapy.
Time frame: Week 16
Change in average DAS28-4 (ESR) score after 24 weeks of therapy
Change in average DAS28-4 (ESR) score after 24 weeks of therapy
Time frame: Week 24
Change in average HAQ-DI score after 24 weeks of therapy
Time frame: Week 24
Change in average score according to modified Sharp method of assessment after 24 weeks of therapy
Time frame: Week 24
Change in average score of erosions according to modified Sharp method of assessment after 24 weeks of therapy
Time frame: Week 24
Change in average score of joint spase narrowing according to modified Sharp method of assessment after 24 weeks of therapy
Time frame: Week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Percentage of patients with progression of disease according to modified Steinbrocker method of assessment after 24 weeks of treatment
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of patients who developed ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response on 52 week of therapy
The proportion of patients achieving at least 20%, 50% and 70% improvement in ACR criteria after 52 weeks of therapy.
Time frame: Week 52
Change in average DAS28-4 (ESR) score after 52 weeks of therapy
Change in average DAS28-4 (ESR) score after 52 weeks of therapy
Time frame: Week 52
Change in average HAQ-DI score after 52 weeks of therapy
Time frame: Week 52
Change in average score according to modified Sharp method of assessment after 52 weeks of therapy
Time frame: Week 52
Change in average score of erosions according to modified Sharp method of assessment after 52 weeks of therapy
Time frame: Week 52
Change in average score of joint space narrowing according to modified Sharp method of assessment after 52 weeks of therapy
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of patients with progression of disease according to modified Steinbrocker method of assessment after 52 weeks of treatment
Time frame: Week 52
Frequency and severity of AE/SAE
Frequency and severity of AE/SAE in patients who received at least one injection of study drug/placebo
Time frame: 52 weeks
Frequency of AE 3-4 grade CTCAE 4.03
Frequency of AE 3-4 grade CTCAE 4.03 in patients who received at least one injection of study drug/placebo
Time frame: 52 weeks
Frequency of premature withdrawal due to AE/SAE
Time frame: 52 weeks
Percentage of patients who have developed binding and neutralizing antibodies to rituximab on week 24 and week 52
Time frame: Week 24, Week 52