The study objectives are to assess the safety and efficacy of the CoreValve Evolut 34R transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) system in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are considered at high or extreme risk for surgical aortic valve replacement.
This objective will be accomplished by a prospective, single arm, historical controlled, multi-site study involving up to 60 implanted subjects at up to 15 study sites in the United States. Procedural and 30 day safety and efficacy results from this study will be compared to appropriate historical control data for the Medtronic CoreValve System. Subjects will be followed up to 5 years following implantation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
72
The CoreValve Evolut 34R System is a transcatheter aortic valve implantation system comprised of the following three components: 1. Evolut 34R Transcatheter Aortic Valve (TAV) 2. EnVeo R Delivery Catheter System (DCS) with EnVeo R InLine Sheath 3. EnVeo R Loading System (LS)
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan Health Systems
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality
Percentage of participants with all-cause mortality at 30 days
Time frame: 30 Days
Percentage of Participants With Stroke (Disabling)
Percentage of participants with disabling stroke (VARC-II definitions) at 30 days
Time frame: 30 Days
Device Success Rate
Device Success defined as: * Absence of procedural mortality, AND * Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location, AND * Intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve, defined as the absence of patient prosthesis-mismatch and mean gradient \< 20 mmHg (or peak velocity \< 3 m/sec), AND * Absence of moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation
Time frame: 24 hours to 7 days post implantation
The Percentage of Subjects With no More Than Mild Prosthetic Regurgitation at Early Post Procedure Echocardiogram
The percentage of subjects with no more than mild prosthetic regurgitation at early post procedure echocardiogram as assessed by echo core laboratory
Time frame: 24 hours to 7 days post implantation
Percentage of Participants With VARC II Combined Safety Endpoint Event at 30 Days
VARC II composite safety endpoint includes the following components: * All-cause mortality * All stroke (disabling and non-disabling) * Life-threatening bleeding * Acute kidney injury: stage 2 or 3 (including renal replacement therapy). * Coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention. * Major vascular complication. * Valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure (BAV, TAVR, or SAVR)
Time frame: 30 days post-implantation
Percentage of Participants With Life Threatening or Disabling Bleeding
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Spectrum Health Hospitals
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
New York Langone Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
St. Francis Hospital
Roslyn, New York, United States
Riverside Methodist Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Pinnacle Health/Moffitt Heart and Vascular Institute
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital
Dallas, Texas, United States
Aurora Health Care/St Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Percentage of participants with life threatening or disabling bleeding - see VARC-2 definitions for classification details
Time frame: 30 days post-implantation
Percentage of Participants With Major Vascular Complication
Percentage of participants with Major vascular complication - see VARC-2 definitions for additional details
Time frame: 30 days
Percentage of Participants With Acute Kidney Injury: Stage 2 or 3
Percentage of participants with Acute Kidney Injury: Stage 2 or 3 - see VARC-2 definitions for additional details
Time frame: 30 days
Percentage of Participants With Coronary Artery Obstruction
Percentage of participants with coronary artery obstruction - see VARC-2 definitions for additional details
Time frame: 30 days
Percentage of Subjects With Valve-related Dysfunction Requiring Repeat Procedure
Percentage of subjects with valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure - see VARC-2 definitions for additional details
Time frame: 30 days
Percentage of Subjects With Permanent Pacemaker Implant at 30 Days
Percentage of subjects with new permanent pacemaker implant at 30 days.
Time frame: 30 days
Percentage of Resheath and Recapture Success
Successful resheathing is defined as Evolut R TAV (including frame) was resheathed into the capsule of the delivery cathether to the desired amount intended, as verified by fluoroscopy. Successful recapture is defined as the entire Evolut R TAV (including frame) is resheathed into the capsule of the delivery catheter until there is no gap between the capsule and the tip, as verified by fluoroscopy.
Time frame: Implant procedure
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics - Mean Gradient
Mean gradient (mmHg) as measured by transthoracic echocardiogram and assessed by echo core laboratory
Time frame: 30 days
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics- Aortic Valve Area
Aortic valve area as measured by transthoracic echocardiogram and assessed by echo core laboratory
Time frame: 30 Days
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics - Total Prosthetic Regurgitation Graded as None/Trace
Total prosthetic regurgitation (none/trace) as measured by transthoracic echocardiogram and assessed by echo core laboratory
Time frame: 30 days