The overall aim of this proposed research is to determine the safety, feasibility and efficacy (AP vs at home use of SAP) of the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) controller in day and night closed-loop control in young children 5-8 years old with type 1 diabetes over multiple 48 hours in an out-patient setting.
Young children with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) in the age range of 5-8 years old are a population with clear needs but unique challenges regarding the application of artificial pancreas (AP) technologies. Young children are likely to benefit from an AP system, with current deficits in glycemic control that include both significant hypoglycemia and sub-optimal HbA1c levels; however, they have undeveloped abilities to control and interact with the AP system, posing potential safety issues. During the hours that these children are away from their parents at school and elsewhere, they lack the sophistication to operate the currently-available tools in an AP system--and may induce harm if they are allowed to do so, causing parental resistance to AP use. Commercially-available insulin pumps have mechanisms to lock access to children to prevent inappropriate insulin-delivery. However, the AP is more complex than an insulin pump, both in requiring more detailed setting information (that a child could adversely alter) and in providing alerts for impending low- and high-blood glucose (BG) levels (that one wouldn't want to lock out to child use). These functions are all run via a platform on a smart phone-a device with which young children may already feel a high degree of familiarity and thus be more likely to attempt to explore and potentially change settings. It is likely that young children will benefit the most from a system that gives them access to some AP features but provides access to other features only for their parents. In this sense, young children require a device that is not user-centered as much as family-centered. A redesign of the system to provide appropriate access to AP tools-in which certain users can obtain access to certain functionalities-is direly needed before children in this age range can benefit from the improvements in blood glucose (BG) control that the AP has to offer.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
12
All subjects will use DiAs Medical Platform, a study insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in closed-loop mode during a Research House/Hotel admission that will last up to 72 hours.
University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Percent of Sensor Glucose Readings Between 70-180 mg/dL
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 68 hours
Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are <70 mg/dL
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 68 hours
Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are >150 mg/dL
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 72 hours
Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are >180 mg/dL
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 68 hours
Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are >250 mg/dL
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 68 hours
Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are >400 mg/dL
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 72 hours
Distribution of Sensor and Meter Glucose Values (Maximum, Minimum, Median, Interquartile Range, Mean, Standard Deviation)
All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 72 hours
Distribution of Sensor and Meter Glucose Values (Maximum)
All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 72 hours
Distribution of Sensor and Meter Glucose Values (Minimum)
All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 72 hours
Distribution of Sensor and Meter Glucose Values (Median/Interquartile Range)
All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 72 hours
Mean BG (as Measured by CGM)
All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 68 hours
Hypoglycemia Area Under the Curve <60
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 72 hours
Hypoglycemia Area Under the Curve <70 mg/dL
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 72 hours
Hyperglycemia Area Under the Curve >180
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 72 hours
Hyperglycemia Area Under the Curve >250 mg/dL
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 72 hours
Incidence of Hypoglycemia Per Subject, Defined by Handheld Meter Glucose <70 mg/dL
All subjects have hypoglycemia monitored by meter analysis and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 68 hours
End of Night Blood Glucose
All subjects have blood glucose evaluated upon rising (approximately 7 am) and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
Time frame: 72 hours