The overall purpose is to develop and maintain a multi-institutional database comprising of information regarding surgical, clinical and oncological features of patients that will be treated for gastric cancer with robotic, laparoscopic or open approaches and subsequent follow-up. The main objective is to compare the three surgical arms on surgical and clinical outcomes, as well as on the oncological follow-up.
A review of the scientific literature, which was recently published by the IMIGASTRIC study group, aimed to perform a more complete analysis of the current situation regarding performing minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer. Significant limitations were found in the analyzed studies, including: * Small samples of patients, mostly low-quality comparative studies * Selection bias in the comparison groups (e.g. stage, extent of lymphadenectomy) * Absence of subgroup analysis in significant research fields * Lack of information on the surgical techniques adopted A large prospective multicenter registry could thus be the optimal way to clarify the role of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer and permit the evaluation of its short and long-term effects. A working basis for analyzing outcomes of interest and obtaining directions for guidelines and future study developments can also be created. The following would be the main advantages of a large prospective multicenter registry: * Achieving a large sample of patients * Collecting multiple variables, allowing for the making of a comprehensive statistical report * Standardizing the methodology to be adopted, thus increasing accuracy * Bringing together the experiences of both East and West to discover shared points A prospective registry can become a powerful tool that can guide research in this field to new developments and pave the way for other investigational opportunities.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
5,000
Minimally invasive surgical approach, related to the availability of a robotic surgical system (eg Da Vinci surgical system), that allows a surgeon to perform surgery through a console and dedicated devices.
Minimally invasive surgical approach performed through traditional laparoscopy.
Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia
Terni, Italy
RECRUITINGRate of patients with intraoperative adverse events
events other than the normal course of the surgery
Time frame: During surgery
Mean of retrieved lymph nodes
Count of retrieved lymph nodes at the histopathological examination of the surgical specimen
Time frame: Within 30 days after surgery
Rate of patients alive
subjects alive at the planned endpoint
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Rate of patients alive
subjects alive at the planned endpoint
Time frame: 2 year after surgery
Rate of patients alive
subjects alive at the planned endpoint
Time frame: 3 year after surgery
Rate of patients alive
subjects alive at the planned endpoint
Time frame: 4 year after surgery
Rate of patients alive
subjects alive at the planned endpoint
Time frame: 5 year after surgery
Mean post-operative hospital stay
hospital stay of the patients after surgery
Time frame: from the day after surgery to patient discharge, assessed up to 90 days
Rate of complications after discharge
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
any surgical related event after patient's discharge
Time frame: 5 year after surgery