The aim of this study was to compare the successful spinal puncture among patients with pendant position in comparison with those who used traditional sitting position for caesarean section.
Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study. Subjects were divided into Group A for traditional sitting position (n=154) and Group B for pendant position (n=154). The outcome parameters recorded were the number of attempt for the successful spinal puncture, the number of spinal needle-bone contact and the duration to perform spinal puncture. Data were analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Scientist (SPSS) version 21.0. Numerical data was served in median with minimal and maximal value. Numerical data was analyzed by using Mann-Whitney test. Categorical data was served by using relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and was analyzed by using Chi-Square test.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
308
Subjects were set on traditional sitting position before spinal anesthesia begun.
Subjects were set on pendant position before spinal anesthesia begun.
Successful spinal puncture attempt number
The number of attempt for the successful spinal puncture for each positions
Time frame: 2 months
The number of spinal needle-bone contact
The number of spinal needle-bone contact for each positions
Time frame: 2 months
Spinal puncture duration
the duration to perform spinal puncture for each positions
Time frame: 2 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.